Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 108, Issue 2, pp 72–75 | Cite as

Cancellous bone and mechanical strength of the femoral neck

  • O. Delaere
  • A. Dhem
  • R. Bourgois
Original Articles

Summary

Twenty pairs of dried macerated femora were submitted to progressive, physiologically oriented loading. The aim of this work was to determine the role of trabecular bone, the importance of the bone mineral density of the femoral shaft, and the importance of the Singh index in the mechanical strength of the femoral neck. By means of an original technique, the influence of both the principal tensile and secondary compressive trabecular groups on the mechanical strength to bending stress has been demonstrated. The artificial destruction of these trabecular groups is responsible for a loss of strength of more than 50% in varus angulation while it has practically no effect in valgus angulation. On the other hand, the mechanical strength of the femoral neck is better correlated with the bone mineral density of the femoral shaft (r=0.74) than with the Singh index (r=0.50) or with age (r=0.15).

Keywords

Public Health Bone Mineral Density Bone Mineral Femoral Neck Mechanical Strength 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bohr H, Schaadt O (1983) Bone mineral content of femoral bone and the lumbar spine measured in women with fracture of the femoral neck by dual photon absorptiometry. Clin Orthop 179:240–245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown TD, Ferguson AB Jr (1978) The development of a computational stress analysis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 60:619–629Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown TD, Ferguson AB Jr (1980) Mechanical property distributions in the cancellous bone of the human proximal femur. Acta Orthop Scand 51:429–437PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dalén N, Hellström L-G, Jacobson B (1976) Bone mineral content and mechanical strength of the femoral neck. Acta Orthop Scand 47:503–508PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Delaere O, Bourgois R, Dhem A (1988) Considérations anatomo-physiologiques à propos de l'extrémité proximale du fémur humain. Arch Anat Histol Embryol (Strasb) (in press)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hall MC (1961) The trabecular patterns of the neck of the femur with particular reference to changes in osteoporosis. Can Med Assoc J 85:1141–1144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hardinge MG (1949) Determination of the strength of the cancellous bone in the head and neck of the femur. Surg Gynccol Obstet 89:439–441Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koch JC (1917) The laws of bone architecture. Am J Anat 21:177–298Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leichter I, Margulies JY, Weinreb A, Mizrahi J, Robin GC, Conforty B, Makin M, Bloch B (1982) The relationship between bone density, mineral content, and mechanical strength in the femoral neck. Clin Orthop 163:272–281PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maquet P, Vu Anh Tuan (1981) Des forces exercées sur la hanche durant la marche. Acta Orthop Belg 47:5–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martens M, Van Audekercke R, Delport P, De Meester P, Mulier JC (1983) The mechanical characteristics of cancellous bone at the upper femoral region. J Biomech 16:971–983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pauwels F (1980) Biomechanics of the locomotor apparatus. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pogrund H, Rigal WM, Makin M, Robin G, Menczel J, Steinberg R (1981) Determination of osteoporosis in patients with fractured femoral neck using the Singh index: a Jerusalem study. Clin Orthop 156:189–195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sartoris DJ, Sommer FG, Kosek J, Gies A, Carter D (1985) Dual-energy projection radiography in the evaluation of the femoral neck strength, density and mineralization. Invest Radiol 20:476–485PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Singh M, Nagrath AR, Maini PS (1970) Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 52:457–467Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Townsend PR, Rose RM, Radin EL (1975) Buckling studies of single human trabeculae. J Biomech 8:199–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Urist MR (1960) Observations bearing on the problem of osteoporosis. In: Kaare-Rodahl, Nicholson JT, Brown EM Jr (eds) Bone as a tissue. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 18–45Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Von Meyer H (1867) Die Architektur der Spongiosa. Reichert und Dubois-Reymond's Archiv 34:615–628Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Delaere
    • 1
  • A. Dhem
    • 1
  • R. Bourgois
    • 2
  1. 1.Unité d'Anatomie HumaineUniversité Catholique de LouvainBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Chaire de ConstructionEcole Royale MilitaireBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations