Parasitology Research

, Volume 81, Issue 8, pp 651–656 | Cite as

Mating behaviour in mixed infections ofSchistosoma haematobium andS. mattheei

  • V. R. Southgate
  • L. A. Tchuem Tchuenté
  • J. Vercruysse
  • J. Jourdane
Original Paper


In mixed infections ofSchistosoma haematobium andS. mattheei, homospecific and heterospecific pairs are formed, with a preponderance of homospecific pairs indicating the existence of a mate preference system.S. haematobium apparently exhibits a greater specific mate recognition system than doesS. mattheei. In sequential infections when mice are exposed toS. mattheei 4 weeks after infection withS. haematobium, S. haematobium males are better at pairing withS. mattheei females than areS. mattheei males. Hence, genetic exchanges betweenS. haematobium andS. mattheei giving rise to viable hybrids poses the problem of the genetic identity of these species of schistosomes. The most important reproductive isolating mechanisms are definitive host specificity,S. haematobium being primarily a parasite of man, whereasS. mattheei is a parasite of domestic stock and wild ungulates, and the preference for homo-specific pairings in simultaneous infections. In contrast, whenS. haematobium is the older infection,S. haematobium males are better thanS. mattheei males at pairing with females of either species. Hybridisation is the likely outcome of such interactions. The lack of viability ofS. mattheei male XS. haematobium female indicates genetic differences between the two species. Occurrences of natural hybridisation betweenS. haematobium andS. mattheei may lead to a change in the response of the parasite to chemotherapeutic treatment.


Mating Behaviour Exchange betweenS Definitive Host Mate Preference Genetic Exchange 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alves W (1947) Observations onS. mattheei andS. haematobium. Adults and eggs from experimental animals and man. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 41:430–431Google Scholar
  2. Jourdane J, Southgate VR (1992) Genetic exchanges and sexual interactions between species of the genusSchistosoma. Res Rev Parasitol 52:21–26Google Scholar
  3. Kruger FJ (1990) Frequency and possible consequences of hybridization betweenSchistosoma haematobium andS. mattheei in the Eastern Transvaal Lowveld. J Helminthol 64:333–336Google Scholar
  4. Kruger FJ, Evans AC (1990) Do all human urinary infections withSchistosoma mattheei represent hybridization betweenS. haematobium andS. mattheei? J Helminthol 64:330–332Google Scholar
  5. Kruger FJ, Hamilton-Atwell (1988) Scanning electron microscope studies of miracidia suggest introgressive hybridization betweenSchistosoma haematobium andS. haematobium XS. mattheei in the Eastern Transvaal. J Helminthol 62:141–147Google Scholar
  6. Kruger FJ, Schutte CHJ, Visser PS, Evans AC (1986a) Phenotypic differences inSchistosoma mattheei ova from populations sympatric and allopatric toS. haematobium. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 53:103–107Google Scholar
  7. Kruger FJ, Hamilton-Attwell VL, Schutte CHJ (1986b) Scanning electron microscopy of the teguments of males from five populations ofSchistosoma mattheei. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 53: 108–110Google Scholar
  8. Le Roux PL (1954)Schistosoma spp. recovered experimentally through snails, mice and hamsters from a human subject of urinary schistosomiasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 48:281Google Scholar
  9. Pitchford RJ (1959) Cattle schistosomiasis in man in the eastern Transvaal. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 53:285–290Google Scholar
  10. Pitchford RJ (1961) Observations on a possible hybrid between the two schistosomesS. haematobium andS. mattheei. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 55:44–51Google Scholar
  11. Pitchford RJ, Lewis M (1978) Oxamniquine in the treatment of various schistosome infections in South Africa. S Afr Med J 53:677–680Google Scholar
  12. Rollinson D, Southgate VR (1987) The genusSchistosoma: a taxonomic appraisal. In: Rollinson D, Simpson AJG (eds) The biology of schistosomes: from genes to latrines. Academic Press London, pp 1–49Google Scholar
  13. Schutte CHJ (1983) Die Epidemiologie van Bilharzia in die Republiek van Suid-Afrika. S Afr J Contin Med Ed 1:45–49Google Scholar
  14. Southgate VR, Rollinson D, Ross GC, Knowles RJ (1982) Mating behaviour in mixed infections ofSchistosoma haematobium andS. intercalatum. J Nat Hist 16:491–496Google Scholar
  15. Taylor MG (1970) Hybridisation experiments on five species of African schistosomes. J Helminthol 44:253–314Google Scholar
  16. Tchuem Tchuenté LA, Imbert-Establet D, Delay B, Jourdane J (1993) Choice of mate, a reproductive isolating mechanism betweenSchistosoma intercalatum andS. mansoni in mixed infections. Int J Parasitol 23:179–185Google Scholar
  17. Tchuem Tchuenté LA, Southgate VR, Imbert-Establet D, Jourdane J (1995) Change of mate and mating competition between males ofSchistosoma intercalatum andS. mansoni. Parasitology 110:45–52Google Scholar
  18. Van Wyk JA (1977) Transmission ofSchistosoma mattheei from animals to man. In: Gear JHS (ed) Medicine in a tropical environment: proceedings of international symposium held in South Africa, 1976. A.A. Balkema, Cape Town, pp 705–717Google Scholar
  19. Wright CA, Ross GC (1980) Hybrids betweenSchistosoma haematobium andS. mattheei and their identification by isoelectric focusing of enzymes. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 74: 326–332Google Scholar
  20. Wright CA, Southgate VR (1976) Hybridization of schistosomes and some of its implications. In: Taylor AER, Muller R (eds) Genetic aspects of host-parasite relationships. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 55–86Google Scholar
  21. Wright CA, Southgate VR, Ross GC, Knowles RJ (1977) Strain characterization inSchistosoma. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 71:287Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. R. Southgate
    • 1
  • L. A. Tchuem Tchuenté
    • 1
  • J. Vercruysse
    • 2
  • J. Jourdane
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyThe Natural History MuseumLondonUK
  2. 2.Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of ParasitologyUniversity of GentMerelbekeBelgium
  3. 3.Centre de Biologie et d'Ecologie Tropicale et Mediterranéenne, Laboratoire de Biologie AnimaleUniversité de PerpignanPerpignan, CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations