Skip to main content
Log in

Cellular reactions in the small intestine of rats after infection withFasciola hepatica

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groups of five rats each were infected with metacercariae ofFasciola hepatica according to two experimental procedures. In the first experiment, they received 20 metacercariae 0, 1, 2 or 3 times at intervals of 4 weeks. In the second, both the inoculation dose and the interval between doses were varied. After the animals had been killed, the small intestine was prepared for histology and tissue sections were stained for the detection and quantification of mucosal mast cells (MMCs), eosinophils and goblet cells. The density of eosinophils and MMCs increased significantly with each reinfection in the first experiment, in the second, the MMC reaction reached a peak at 4 weeks post-infection (p.i.), whereas the eosinophils peaked at 4 and 17 weeks p.i. In addition, the reaction of these cells depended on the infectious dose. In both experiments, goblet cells reacted only weakly. These findings thus clearly reflect a considerable intestinal response against migrating juvenileF. hepatica. The pattern of these defence reactions in the small intestine suggests some similarities with the mechanisms of antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity that have been shown to take place duringSchistosoma mansoni reinfection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alizadeh H, Wakelin D (1982) Comparison of rapid expulson ofTrichinella spiralis in mice and rats. Int J Parasitol 12:65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Bexter A (1982) “Roulade”-Technik/“Swiss roll”-Technik. Histo 1:12–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Burden DJ, Hughes DL, Hammet NC (1982)Fasciola hepatica: antibody coating of juvenile flukes in the intestinal lumen of resistant rats. Res Vet Sci 32:44–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Capron A, Dessaint JP, Haque A, Capron M (1982) Antibodydependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity against parasites. Prog Allergy 31:234–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies C, Goose J (1981) Killing of newly excysted juveniles ofFasciola hepatica in sensitized rats. Parasite Immunol 3:81–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Doy TG, Hughes DL, Harness E (1978) Resistance of the rat to reinfection withFasciola hepatica and the possible involvement of intestinal eosinophil leucocytes. Res Vet Sci 25:41–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Doy TG, Hughes DL, Harness E (1981) Hypersensitivity in rats infected withFasciola hepatica: possible role in protection against a challenge infection. Res Vet Sci 30:360–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ (1971) Acquired immunity to experimental infection withFasciola hepatica in cattle. Res Vet Sci 12:527–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ (1973) Homocytotropic antibodies induced in calves by infection withFasciola hepatica. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 45:744–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffus WPH, Franks D (1980) In vitro effect of immune serum and bovine granulocytes on juvenileFasciola hepatica. Clin Exp Immunol 41:430–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Enerbäck L (1981) The gut mucosal mast cell. Monogr Allergy 17:222–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Haig DM, McKee TA, Jarrett EEE, Woodbury RG, Miller HRP (1982) Generation of mucosal mast cells is stimulated in vitro by factors derived from T cells of helminth-infected rats. Nature 300:188–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Harness E, Hughes DL, Doy TG (1976) The demonstration of pre-hepatic immune responses toFasciola hepatica in the mouse. Int J parasitol 6:15–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Haroun EM, Hammond JA, Sewell MMH (1980) Resistance toFasciola hepatica in rats and rabbits following sensitising infection and treatment. Res Vet Sci 28:377–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes TJ, Bailer J, Mitrovic M (1972) Immunity in rats to superinfection withFasciola hepatica. J Parasitol 58:1103–1105

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett EEE, Haig DM (1984) Mucosal mast cells in vivo and in vitro. Immunol Today 5:115–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett EEE, Miller HRP (1982) Production and activities of IgE in helminth infections. Prog Allergy 31:178–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Lendrum AC (1944) The staining of eosinophil polymorphs and enterochromaffin cells in histological sections (abstract). J Pathol Bacteriol 56:441

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna LG (1968) Methods for cytoplasmic granules. In: Luna LG (ed) Manual of histologic staining methods of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP). AFIP, Washington, DC, pp 111–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud AAF (1980) Eosinophilopoiesis. In: Mahmoud AAF, Austen KF (eds) The eosinophil in health and disease. Grune & Stratton, New York, pp 61–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Meierhofer B (1987) Zelluläre Reaktionen im Dünndarm von Ratten nach Erst- bzw. Reinfektion mitFasciola hepatica. Thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Berm, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbourne EA, Howell MJ (1990) Eosinophil responses toFasciola hepatica in rodents (Abstract). Bull Soc Fr Parasitol 8 [Suppl 1]:632

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller HRP (1984) The protective mucosal response against gastrointestinal nematodes in ruminants and laboratory animals. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 6:167–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller HRP, Nawa Y (1979)Nippostrongylus brasiliensis: intestinal goblet cell response in adoptively immunized rats. Exp Parasitol 47:81–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraes FR, Silva VMS, Vasconcelos OT, Costa AJ, Moraes JRE (1986) Mastócitos da mucosa intestinal x carga parasitária em suínos naturalmente infectados por nematóides. Ars Vet 2:255–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham G (1985) Immune responses in rats and cattle to primary infections withFasciola hepatica. Res Vet Sci 39:357–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer DG (1984) Die Entwicklung der nicht-epithelialen Zellpopulationen in der Darmschleimhaut des neonatalen Kalbes im Hinblick auf die Ausbildung des Schleimhautimmunsystems. Thesis, Raculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister K (1984) Role of IgE in fascioliasis. Prev Vet Med 2:359–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister K (1986) Seroepidemiological and immunological studies on fascioliasis. Habilitation thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bern, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister K, Meierhofer B (1986) Cellular responses in the small intestine and liver ofFasciola hepatica-infected rats. Mitt Oesterr Ges Tropenmed Parasitol 8:73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister K, Turner K, Currie A, Hall E, Jarrett EEE (1983) IgE production in rat fascioliasis. Parasite Immunol 5:587–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith NC, Bryant C, Ovington VS (1990) Responses of nude rats to infection withNippostrongylus brasilientsis (Abstract). Bull Soc Fr Parasitol 8 [Suppl 1]:591

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedrychowicz H, Turner K, Pfister K, Holmes PH, Armour J (1984) Local antibody responses in the bile and faeces of sheep infected withFesciola hepatica. Res Vet Sci 37:44–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibel ER (1979) Stereological methods 1. Practical methods for biological morphometry, vol 1. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodbury RG, Miller HRP, Huntley JF, Newlands GFJ, Palliser AC, Wakelin D (1984) Mucosal mast cells are functionally active during spontaneous expulsion of intestinal nematode infections in rat. Nature 312:450–452

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to Prof. Dr. J. Eckert (Zürich) on the occasion of his 60th birthday

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Charbon, J.L., Spähni, M., Wicki, P. et al. Cellular reactions in the small intestine of rats after infection withFasciola hepatica . Parasitol Res 77, 425–429 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00931639

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00931639

Keywords

Navigation