Skip to main content
Log in

Eimeria spp. of the domestic fowl: Analysis of genetic variability between species and strains using DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers and denaturing gradient-gel electrophoresis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The genetic relatedness of 5Eimeria spp. of the domestic fowl, including 11 strains ofE. acervulina, 2 strains ofE. tenella and 1 precocious line ofE. acervulina, was assayed by means of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and denaturing gradient-gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Seven different oligonucleotides were used to generate similarity coefficients for the species and strains ofEimeria infecting chickens. Between 1 and 13 DNA segments, depending on the species/strain-primer combination, were amplified with the various primers. Amplification products ranged in size from 0.16 to 3.8 kb.E. acervulina strains demonstrated two to four major common bands unique to the species. These strains also exhibited major and minor differences in their DNA patterns. Band-match analyses from both polyacrylamide and denaturing gradient gels were used to calculate similarity coefficients for theEimeria spp. and strains tested. Species differences, readily detected upon examination of DNA banding patterns, gave similarity coefficients of 4%–38% and 3%–18% when analyzed by polyacrylamide-and denaturing gradient-gel electrophoresis, respectively. A similar analysis ofE. acervulina strains yielded similarity coefficients of 55%–95% and 51%–85%, respectively. The differences observed between both species and strains were greater when the RAPD-assay products were analyzed via DGGE, indicating that a combination of these two techniques may provide a more stringent analysis of the genetic relatedness of these coccidia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barral V, This P, Imbert-Establer D, Combes C, Delseny M (1993) Genetic variability and evolution of theSchistosoma genome analysed by using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Mol Biochem Parasitol 59:211–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman HD (1982) The use of enzyme electrophoresis for the identification of the species ofEimeria present in field isolates of coccidia. Parasitology 85:437–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando MA, Pasternak JJ (1991)Eimeria spp. of the domestic fowl: resolution of chromosomes by field inversion gel electrophoresis. Exp Parasitol 72:306–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer SG, Lerman LS (1983) DNA fragments differing by single base-pair substitutions are separated in denaturing gradient-gels: correspondence with melting theory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:1579–1583

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin PH, Annis SL (1991) Rapid identification of genetic variation and pathotype ofLeptosphaeria maculans by random amplified polymorphic DNA assay. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:2482–2486

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray M, Charpentier A, Walsh K, Wu P, Bender W (1991) Mapping point mutations in the drosophilarosy locus using denaturing gradient-gel blots. Genetics 127:139–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffers TK (1975) AttenuatedEimeria tenella through selection for precociousness. J Parasitol 61:1083–1090

    Google Scholar 

  • Karim MJ, Hoare JA, Trees AJ (1991) Limited heterogeneity between strains ofEimeria tenella isolated from Britain and Bangladesh. Res Vet Sci 51:29–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Kučera J (1991) Enzyme variants ofEimeria parasitizing the domestic fowl and possibilities of species diagnostics. Folia Parasitol (Praha) 38:193–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee E-H, Fernando MA (1977) Characterization of coccidial DNA an aid in species identification. Z Parasitenkd 53:129–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman LS, Fischer SG, Hurley I, Silverstein K, Lumelsky N (1984) Sequence-determined DNA separations. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 13:339–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Long PL, Joyner LR (1984) Problems in the identification of species ofEimeria. J Protozool 31:535–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Long PL, Reid WM (1982) A guide to the diagnosis of coccidiosis in chickens. University of Georgia Research Report 404. University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  • Long PL, Millard BJ, Joyner LP, Norton CC (1976) A guide to laboratory techniques used in the study and diagnosis of avian coccidiosis. Folia Vet Lat 6:201–217

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougald LR, Jeffers TK (1976)Eimeria tenella (Sporozoa: Coccidia): gametogony following a single asexual generation. Science 192:258–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers RM, Maniatis T, Lerman LS (1987) Detection and localization of single base changes by denaturing gradient-gel electrophoresis. Methods Enzymol 155:501–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Li WH (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5269–5273

    Google Scholar 

  • Procunier JD, Fernando MA, Barta JR (1993) Species and strain differentiation ofEimeria spp. of the domestic fowl using DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers. Parasitol Res 79:98–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Remmler O, McGregor JK (1964) A method to facilitate isolation of single coccidial oocysts. J Parasitol 50:294

    Google Scholar 

  • Remmler O, McGregor JK (1964) A method to facilitate isolation of single coccidial oocysts. J Parasitol 50:294

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirley MW (1975) Enzyme variation inEimeria species of the chicken. Parasitology 71:369–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirley MW (1978) Electrophoretic variation of enzymes: a further marker for genetic studies of theEimeria. Z Parasitenkd 57:83–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirley MW, McDonald V, Chapman HD, Millard BJ (1984)Eimeria praecox: selection and characteristics of precocious lines. Avian Pathol 13:669–682

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith NC, Hunt M, Ellenrieder C, Shirley MW (1994) Detection of metabolic enzymes ofEimeria by ampholinepolyacrylamide gel isoelectric focusing. Parasitol Res 80:165–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang CC, Stotish RL (1975) Changes of nucleic acids and proteins in the oocysts ofEimeria tenella during sporulation. J Protozool 22:438–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh J, McClelland M (1990) Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:7213–7218

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh J, Petersen C, McClelland M (1991) Polymorphisms generated by arbitrarily primed PCR in the mouse: application to strain identification and genetic mapping. Nucleic Acids Res 19:303–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JG, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski TA, Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531–6535

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnston, D.A., Fernando, M.A. Eimeria spp. of the domestic fowl: Analysis of genetic variability between species and strains using DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers and denaturing gradient-gel electrophoresis. Parasitol Res 81, 91–97 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00931611

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00931611

Keywords

Navigation