Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 241, Issue 4, pp 201–207 | Cite as

Urodynamic studies before and after retropubic colpo-urethrocystopexy in fertile women with stress urinary incontinence

  • H. Rydhström
  • C. S. Iosif
Originals

Summary

We compared urodynamic parameters in a group of 30 healthy women of fertile age, before and after primary retropubic colpo-urethrocystopexy carried out to correct genuine stress urinary incontinence. The mean interval between surgical treatment and follow-up was 38.0 (SD 10.2) months. In 26 women, subjectively and objectively cured at follow-up, we found an increase of 5.1 mm in functional length of the urethra (t=4.5;P<0.001), an increase of 12.3 cm H2O in the urethral closure pressure (t=3.9;P<0.001), and a 22.1% increase in the transmission ratio (t=3.2;P<0.01). However, 9 of these 26 women satisfied with the results of the surgical treatment showed a drop in at least 2 of the parameters studied. In the group of 4 women not satisfied with the results of the surgical treatment we found an improvement in all of the urodynamic parameters studied, similar to those found in the group of satisfied women, though less pronounced. This study indicates that successful surgical treatment of genuine stress urinary incontinence is not related to surgically induced changes in the urodynamic parameters.

Key words

Urinary incontinence Gynecological surgery Urodynamics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bathia NN, Ostergard DR (1981) Urodynamic effects of retropubic urethropexy in genuine stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 140:936–941PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergman A, McCarthy TA (1983) Urodynamic changes after successful operation for stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 147:325–327PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruschini H, Schmidt RA, Tanagho EA (1977) Effect of urethral stretch on urethral pressure profile. Invest Urol 15:107–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Enhörning G (1961) Simultaneous recording of intravesical and intrarectal pressure. A study on urethral closure in normal and stress incontinent women. Acta Chir Scand [Suppl] 276:10–67Google Scholar
  5. Hilton P (1984) Urethral pressure measurement. In: Stanton EL (ed) Clinical Gynecologic Urology. Mosby, St Louis, MoGoogle Scholar
  6. Hodgkinson CP, Daub HP, Kelly WT (1958) Urethrocystogram: Metallic bed chain technique. Clin Obstet Gynecol 21:725–735Google Scholar
  7. Ingelman-Sundberg A (1953) Urininkontinens hos Kvinnan (Female urinary incontinence). Nord Med 50:1149–1152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. International Continence Society (1981) Fourth report on the standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Scand J Urol Nephrol 15:169–171Google Scholar
  9. Iosif CS, Henriksson L, Ulmsten U (1980) Urethrocystometry as a routine method for the objective evaluation of women with urinary incontinence. Arch Gynecol 230:41–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Iosif CS (1985) Colpourethrocystopexy—a simple method for treatment of genuine primary stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 64:525–527PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lapides J, Ajemian EP, Bruce HS, Lichward JR, Breekey BA (1960) Physiopathology of stress incontinence. Surg Gynecol Obstet 3:224–231Google Scholar
  12. Weil A, Reyes H, Bischoff P, Rottenberg RD, Krauer F (1984) Modifications of the urethral rest and stress profiles after different types of surgery for urinary stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynecol 91:46–55Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Rydhström
    • 1
  • C. S. Iosif
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity HospitalLundSweden

Personalised recommendations