Quantitative evaluation of peer review of program project and center applications in allergy and immunology
- 28 Downloads
We compared the review patterns of applications for program projects and centers in allergy and immunology, reviewed by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases review committee, with those of individual research projects in immunology, reviewed by three Division of Research Grants study sections. A high concordance between these review groups was obtained with respect to the application approval rate, mean score, and distribution of applications in various priority score ranges. Furthermore, we observed a high degree of consensus among reviewers on the quality of many program project and center applications, especially those with priority scores between 100 and 200.
Key wordsProgram projects and centers peer review application approval rates priority scores variability in scores
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service: NIH Publication No. 84–10, 1984, pp 201–359Google Scholar
- 4.Carter CM: Peer review, citations, and biomedical research policy: NIH grants to medical school faculty. Rand Institute Monograph DHEW R-1583, 1974Google Scholar
- 6.Winer DJ: Statistical Principles and Experimental Design. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1962Google Scholar
- 7.National Institutes of Health, Program Analysis Branch: NIH support for basic research in immunology, fiscal year 1970–1981. Program Analysis Note No. 7, 1982Google Scholar
- 8.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service: NIH Publication No. 84–1261, 1984, pp 1–63.Google Scholar