Skip to main content
Log in

Videotaped simulated families as a tool in family therapy outcome research

  • Published:
International Journal of Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Twenty-two therapists who had treated 57 families in brief conjoint family therapy under supervision responded to a videotaped simulated family as if they were treating it. Their responses were audiotaped and coded on a system devised for this study. Positive relationships were found between the ratings of expertise based on the coding system, and independent ratings of the treated families' satisfaction with treatment and the status of the presenting symptoms 6 months after termination. Videotaped simulated families are potentially useful as standardizable methods of revealing individual differences in therapists for family therapy outcome research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference Notes

  1. Chagoya, L.A situational test to explore family therapists' behaviour. Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, Montreal, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chagoya, L., Presser, B.G. & Sigal, J.J.Family therapists' intervention scale-l. Institute of Community and Family Psychiaty, Montreal. Manual in preparation.

  3. Mayerovitch, J.A reliability study of a new system for coding family therapists' verbalizations. M.A. thesis submitted to Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, 1972,

  4. Presser, B.G., & Sigal, J.J.Family therapists' intervention scale-ll. Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, Montreal. Manual in preparation.

  5. Presser, B.G., Sigal, J.J., Mayerovitch, J., & Chagoya, L.Individual differences in family therapists' style. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Windsor, Ontario, June 1974.

  6. Santa-Barbara, J., Woodward, C.A., Levin, S., Goodman, J.T., Streiner, D.L., Muzzin, L., & Epstein, N.B.Variables related to outcome in family therapy: Some preliminary analyses. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Denver, June 1974.

References

  1. Dawes, R.M. The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making.American Psychologist, 1979,34, 571–582.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dawes, R.M., & Corrigan, B. Linear models in decision making.Psychological Bulletin, 1974,81, 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldberg, L.R. Man versus model of man: A rationale, plus some evidence for improving on clinical inferences.Psychological Bulletin, 1970,73, 422–432.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hopke, W.E. The measurement of counsellor attitudes.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1955,2, 212–216.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Karl, N.J., & Abeles, N. Psychotherapy process as a function of time segment sampling.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1969,73, 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kiresuk, T.J., & Sherman, R.E. Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs.Community Mental Health Journal, 1968,4, 443–458.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kushner, K. On the external validity of two psychotherapy analogues.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978,46, 1394–1402.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Matarazzo, J.D., Weins, A.N., Matarazzo, R.G., & Saslow, G. Speech and silence behavior in clinical psychotherapy and laboratory correlates. In J.M. Shlien (Ed.),Research in psychotherapy. (Vol. 3). Washington, D.C. American Psychological Association, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Postner, R.S., Guttman, H.A., Sigal, J.J., Epstein, N.B., & Rakoff, V.M. Process and outcome in conjoint family therapy.Family Process, 1971,10, 451–473.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roark, A.E. The influences of training on counselor responses in actual and role-playing interviews.Counselor Education and Supervision, 1969,8, 289–295.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Santa-Barbara, J., Woodward, C., Levin, S., Streiner, D.L., Goodman, J.T., & Epstein, N. The McMaster family therapy outcome study: II. Interrelationships among outcome measures.Goal Attainment review, 1977,3, 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sigal, J.J., Guttman, H.A., Chagoya, L., & Lasry, J.C. Predictability of family therapists' behavior.Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, 1975,18, 199–202.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sigal, J.J., Guttman, H.A., Chagoya, L., & Pilon, R. Some stable characteristics of family therapists' interventions in real and simulated families.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977,45, 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Woodward, C.A., Santa-Barbara, J., Levin, S., & Epstein, N.B. The role of goal attainment scaling in evaluating family therapy outcome.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1978,48, 464–476.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Woodward, C., Santa-Barbara, J., Levin, S., & Epstein, N. Aspects of consumer satisfaction with brief family therapy.Family Process, 1979,17, 339–408.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sigal, J.J., Presser, B.G., Woodward, C.A. et al. Videotaped simulated families as a tool in family therapy outcome research. International Journal of Family Therapy 2, 236–242 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00929448

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00929448

Keywords

Navigation