Advertisement

Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde

, Volume 60, Issue 3, pp 249–261 | Cite as

Pathology ofAnopheles stephensi after infection withPlasmodium berghei berghei

I. Mortality rate
  • Adel M. Gad
  • Walter A. Maier
  • Gerhard Piekarski
Original Investigations

Summary

The mortality ofP. berghei-infectedAnopheles stephensi females can be about 30% higher during the first three days than in normal blood-fed mosquitoes. As expected the mortality is higher after feeding on highly infected mice but also depends on the date of feeding and the temperature. Infected mosquitoes kept at 25° C die more often than those kept at 21° C. On the other hand sporozoite production needs the low temperature of 21°C. So the sporozoite production rate falls with increasing temperature, and the mortality rate increases.

Keywords

Mortality Rate Production Rate Rate Increase Infected Mouse Mortality Rate Increase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Zur Pathologie vonAnopheles stephensi nach Infektion mitPlasmodium berghei berghei

I. Mortalität

Zusammenfassung

Ein Vergleich der Mortalitätsrate derAnopheles-Mücken während der Plasmodien-Entwicklung zeigt, daß die Sterblichkeit in den ersten drei Tagen um ca. 30% höher sein kann als bei Kontrolltieren, die mit normalem Blut gefüttert worden waren. Sie ist erwartungsgemäß um so höher, je größer die Parasitämie im Blut der Spendermaus war. Allerdings spielt neben dem Fütterungszeitpunkt die Temperatur eine wichtige Rolle. Infizierte Mücken sterben bei 25°C weit häufiger als bei 21°C; Sporozoitenbildung findet aber bei 21°C statt. Die Fähigkeit zur Sporozoitenbildung nimmt also mit steigender Temperatur ab, die Mortalität zu.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bafort, J.M.: The biology of rodent malaria with particular reference toPlasmodium vinckei vinckei Rodhain 1952. Ann. Soc. Belg. Med. Trop.51, 1–204 (1971)Google Scholar
  2. Box, E.D., Celaya, B.L., Gincrish, W.D.: Development ofPlasmodium berghei inAnopheles quadrimaculatus. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.2, 624–627 (1953)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Briegel, H., Lea, A.O.: Relationship between protein and proteolytic activity in the midgut of mosquitoes. J. Insect Physiol.21, 1597–1604 (1975)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Buxton, P.A.: The effect ofProteosoma upon the survival ofCulex. Parasitology27, 547–550 (1935)Google Scholar
  5. De Buch, A.: Some results of six years mosquito infection work. Am. J. Hyg.24, 1–18 (1936)Google Scholar
  6. Gad, A.M., Maier, W.A., Piekarski, G.: Pathology ofAnopheles stephensi after infection withPlasmodium berghei: II. Changes in amino acid contents. Z. Parasitenkd.Google Scholar
  7. Garnham, P.C.C.: Malaria parasites and other haemosporidia. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publ. 1966Google Scholar
  8. Gass, R. F.: Influences of blood digestion on the development ofPlasmodium gallinaceum (Brumpt) in the midgut ofAedes aegypti (L.). Acta Trop. (Basel)34, 127–140 (1977)Google Scholar
  9. Gooding, R.H.: Physiological aspects of digestion of the blood meal byAedes aegypti andCulex fatigans. J. Med. Entomol.3, 53–60 (1966)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gooding, R.H.: Digestive processes of haematophagous insects. I. A. literature review. Question. Entomol.8, 5–60 (1972)Google Scholar
  11. Huff, C.G., Marchbank, D.F., Shiroishi, T.: Changes in infectiousness of malaria gametocytes. II. Analysis of the possible causative factors. Exp. Parasitol.7, 399–417 (1958)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Maier, W.A.: Über die Mortalität vonCulex pipiens fatigans nach Infektion mitPlasmodium cathemerium. Z. Parasitenkd.41, 11–28 (1973)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Maier, W.A.: Arthropoden als Wirte und Überträger menschlicher Parasiten: Pathologie und Abwehrreaktion der Wirte. Z. Parasitenkd.48, 151–179 (1976)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Meller, H.: Vergreichende Beobachtungen über die Biologie vonAnopheles atroparvus undAnopheles stephensi unter Laboratoriumsbedingungen. Tropenmed. Parasitol.13, 80–100 (1962)Google Scholar
  15. Muirhead-Thomson, R.C.: Mosquito behavior in relation to malaria transmission and control in the tropics. London: Edward Arnold 1951Google Scholar
  16. Perez-Reyez, R.:Anopheles aztecus Hoffmann 1935, a new definitive host for the cyclical transmission ofPlasmodium berghei Vincke et Lips, 1948. J. Parasitol.39, 603–604 (1953)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ross, R.: Possible effects of malaria on anophelines. In: The prevention of malaria, pp. 197–198. London: Murray 1910Google Scholar
  18. Terzian, L.A.: The sulfonamides as factors in increasing susceptibility to parasitic invasion. J. Infect. Dis.87, 285–290 (1950)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Terzian, L.A.: The comparative morphological and physiological effects of various drugs on the sporogonous cycle ofPlasmodium gallinaceum inAedes aegypti. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol.46, 279–300 (1955)Google Scholar
  20. Terzian, L.A., Stahler, N.: Some inorganic acids, bases and salts as determinants of innate immunity in the mosquito. J. Infect. Dis.106, 45–52 (1960)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Terzian, L.A., Stahler, N., Miller, H.: A study of the relation of antibiotics, vitamins, and hormones to immunity to infection. J. Immunol.70, 115–123 (1953)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Terzian, L.A., Stahler, N., Ward, P.A.: The effect of antibiotics and metabolites on the immunity of mosquitoes to malaria infection. J. Infect. Dis.90, 116–130 (1952)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Terzian, L.A., Stahler, N., Weathersby, A.B.: The action of antimalarial drugs in mosquitoes infected withPlasmodium gallinaceum. J. Infect. Dis.84, 47–55 (1949)Google Scholar
  24. Thompson, E.G., Ball, L.H.: Laboratory studies on the biology ofAnopheles stephensi Liston. Mosquito News28, 639–642 (1968)Google Scholar
  25. Thompson, P.E., Huff, C.G.: Saurian malarial parasites of the United States and Mexico. J. Infect. Dis.74, 68–79 (1944)Google Scholar
  26. Vanderberg, J.P.: Development of infectivity by thePlasmodium berghei sporozoite. J. Parasitol.61, 43–50 (1975)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Vanderberg, J.P., Nussenzweig, R.S., Most, H.: Further studies on thePlasmodium berghei — Anopheles stephensi-rodent system of mammalian malaria. J. Parasitol.54, 1009–1016 (1968)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Vanderberg, J.P., Yoeli, M.: Some physiological and metabolic problems to maintenance ofPlasmodium berghei cycle inAnopheles quadrimaculatus. Ann. Soc. Belg. Med. Trop.,45, 419–426 (1965)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Vanderberg, J.P., Yoeli, M.: Effect of temperature on sporogonic development ofPlasmodium berghei. J. Parasitol52, 559–564 (1966)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Vincke, I.H.: Experimental transmission ofPlasmodium berghei. Indian J. Malarial.8, 257–262 (1954)Google Scholar
  31. Weathersby, A.B., Noblet, R.:Plasmodium gallinaceum: development inAedes aegypti maintained on various carbohydrate diets. Exp. Parasitol.34, 426–431 (1973)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Yoeli, M., Most, H., Boné, G.:Plasmodium berghei: Cyclical transmission by experimentally infectedAnopheles quadrimaculatus. Science144, 1580–1581 (1964)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Yoeli, M., Most, H., Boné, G.: The natural history ofPlasmodium berghei in the field and under experimental conditions. Ann. Soc. Belg. Med. Trop.45, 267–274 (1965)PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adel M. Gad
    • 1
  • Walter A. Maier
    • 1
  • Gerhard Piekarski
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Medizinische Parasitologie der UniversitätBonn 1Federal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations