Advertisement

Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications

, Volume 2, Issue 5, pp 348–362 | Cite as

Variational approach to conical bodies having maximum lift-to-drag ratio at hypersonic speeds

  • Ho-Yi Huang
Contributed Papers

Abstract

An investigation of the lift-to-drag ratioE attainable by a slender, conical body flying at hypersonic speeds is presented under the assumptions that the pressure distribution is modified Newtonian and the surface-averaged friction coefficient is constant. The length of the body and the elongation ratio of the cross section α are prescribed, and the values of the free-stream dynamic pressure, the factor modifying the Newtonian pressure distributionm, and the surface-averaged friction coefficientCf are knowna priori. The indirect methods of the calculus of variations are employed, an it is found that, for any given value of the length and the elongation ratio, the optimum transversal contour is a diamond shape. As the elongation ratio increases, the maximum lift-to-drag ratio increases, tending to the limiting valueE=0.529\(E = 0.529^3 \surd (m/C_f )\) when α → ∞.

Keywords

Friction Coefficient Pressure Distribution Indirect Method Ratio Increase Dynamic Pressure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Huang, H. Y.,Variational Approach to Conical Bodies Having Maximum Lift-to-Drag Ratio at Hypersonic Speeds, Rice University, Aero-Astronautics Report No. 35, 1967.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miele, A.,Lift-to-Drag Ratios of Slender Bodies at Hypersonic Speeds, Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1966.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miele, A., Hull, D. G., andBrown, S. L.,Maximum Lift-to-Drag Ratio of a Slender, Flat-Top, Hypersonic Body, Astronautica Acta, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1967.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miele, A., andHuang, H. Y.,Engineering Considerations on the Transversal Contour of a Lifting Body, Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 6, 1967.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miele, A.,The Extremization of Products of Powers of Functionals and Its Application to Aerodynamics, Astronautica Acta, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1966.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miele, A.,On the Minimization of the Product of the Power of Several Integrals, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1967.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miele, A., Editor,Theory of Optimum Aerodynamic Shapes, Academic Press, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Whitehead, A. H., Jr.,Effect of Body Cross Section and Width-Height Ratio on Performance of Bodies and Delta-Wing-Body Combinations at Mach 6.9, NASA TN No. D-2886, 1966.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spencer, B. Jr., andFox, C. H., Jr.,Experimental Study of Optimum Body Shapes at Hypersonic Speeds, Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 5, 1967.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ho-Yi Huang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and Materials ScienceRice UniversityHouston

Personalised recommendations