Abstract
The ultrastructure of the macrogamete and young oocyst ofBarroussia schneideri was studied in the intestinal cells of naturally infected centipedes,Lithobius forficatus. The macrogamete which was bounded by a pellicle consisting of a single outer membrane and two interrupted inner membranes, developed within a parasitophorous vacuole devoid of intravacuolar folds and tubules. The limiting membrane of the young macrogamete possessed few micropores and was surrounded by a layer of amorphous material which remained until after oocyst wall formation. Initially, the macrogamete surface had many invaginations. These disappeared as the wall-forming bodies (WFB) which appeared to be of one type only, became located at the cell periphery. The cytoplasm of the mature macrogamete contained WFB, polysaccharide granules, electron-dense bodies, lipid globules, Golgi bodies, mitochondria, vesicles and abundant rough endoplasmic reticulum. At least one additional membrane was formed during oocyst wall formation and the material for the wall was deposited between the macrogamete cytoplasmic membrane and two external membranes. During oocyst wall formation,Barroussia schneideri seems unlike the Eimeriidae so far studied in that vacuoles lining the periphery of the cytoplasm remained after the WFB contents dispersed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AL :
-
amorphous layer
- C :
-
clumps of granular material
- ED :
-
electron-dense body
- ER :
-
endoplasmic reticulum
- IN :
-
invagination
- L :
-
lipid
- LM :
-
limiting membrane of cytoplasm
- LP :
-
limiting membrane of parasitophorous vacuole
- M :
-
mitochondrion
- MP :
-
micropore
- N :
-
nucleus
- NU :
-
nucleolus
- P :
-
pellicle
- PG :
-
polysaccharide granule
- PV :
-
parasitophorous vacuole
- V :
-
vacuole
- WFB1 :
-
wall-forming bodies of type 1
References
Ball SJ (1982) Ultrastructural observations onBarroussia schneideri (Apicomplexa, Eucoccidiida) in the centipedeLithobius forficatus. J Invesrt Pathol 39:229–235
Ball SJ, Pittilo RM (1983a) Fine structure of the merozoites ofBarroussia schneideri parasitic inLithobius forficatus. Int J Parasitol 13:145–149
Ball SJ, Pittilo RM (1983b) Fine structure of microgametogenesis ofBarroussia schneideri (Coccidia: Eimeriina) in the centipedeLithobius forficatus. Z Parasitenkd 69:305–311
Chobotar B, Scholtyseck E (1982) Ultrastructure. In: Long PL (ed) The biology of the Coccidia. Edward Arnold, London
Ferguson DJP, Hutchison WM, Siim JC (1975) The ultrastructural development of the macrogamete and formation of the oocyst wall ofToxoplasma gondii. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand (B) 83:491–505
Ferguson DJP, Birch-Andersen A, Hutchison WM, Siim JC (1977) Ultrastructural studies on the endogenous development ofE. brunetti. IV. Formation and structure of the oocyst wall. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand (B) 85:201–211
Ferguson DJP, Birch-Andersen A, Hutchison WM, Siim JC (1980) Ultrastructural observations on macrogametogenesis and the structure of the macrogamete ofIsospora felis. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand (B) 88:161–168
Mehlhorn H, Heydorn AO (1979) Electron microscopical study on gametogony ofSarcocystis suihominis in human tissue culture. Z Parasitenkd 58:97–113
Michael E (1975) Structure and mode of function of the organelles associated with nutrition of the macrogametes ofE. acervulina. Z Parasitenkd 45:347–361
Pelster B (1973) Vergleichende elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an den Makrogameten vonIsospora felis andI. rivolta. Z Parasitenkd 41:29–46
Pelster B, Piekarski G (1972) Untersuchungen zur Feinstruktur des Makrogameten vonToxoplasma gondii. Z Parasitenkd 39:225–232
Pittilo RM, Ball SJ, Hutchison WM (1980) The ultrastructural development of the macrogamete ofEimeria stiedai. Protoplasma 104:33–41
Porchet-Henneré E, Ormières R (1973) Étude ultrasturale des stades “Hepatiques” (Gamontes) deGrasseella microcosmi, coccidie parasite du tunicierPyura microcosmus. Protistologica 9:187–211
Porchet-Henneré E, Richard A (1971) La sporogenese chez la coccidieAggregata eberthi. Étude en microscopie electronique. J Protozool 18:614–628
Scholtyseck E (1973) Ultrastructure. In: Hammond DM, Long PL (eds) The Coccidia. University Park Press, Baltimore
Scholtyseck E, Hilali M (1978) Ultrastructural study of the sexual stage ofSarcocystis fusiformis (Railliet, 1897) in domestic cats. Z Parasitenkd 56:205–209
Scholtyseck E, Rommel A, Heller G (1969) Licht- und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen zur Bildung der Oocystenhülle bei Eimerien (Eimeria perforans, E. stiedae undE. tenella). Z Parasitenkd 31:289–298
Scholtyseck E, Mehlhorn H, Hammond DM (1971) Fine structure of macrogametes and oocysts of coccidia and related organisms. Z Parasitenkd 37:1–43
Varghese T (1975) The fine structure of the endogenous stages ofEimeria labbeana: 2. Mature macrogamonts and young oocysts. Z Parasitenkd 46:43–51
Vetterling JM, Pacheco ND, Fayer R (1973) Fine structure of gametogony and oocyst formation inSarcocystis sp. in cell culture. J Protozool 20:613–621
Vivier E, Devauchelle G, Petitprez E, Porchet-Henneré A, Prensier G, Schrevel J, Vinckier D (1970) Observations de cytologie comparée chez les sporozoaires 1. Les structures superficielles chez les formes végétatives. Protistologica 6:127–150
Zaman V, Colley FC (1975) Light and electron microscopic observations of the life cycle ofSarcocystis orientalis sp.n. in the rat (Rattus norvegicus) and the Malaysian reticulated python (Python reticulatus). Z Parasitenkd 47:169–185
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ball, S.J., Pittilo, R.M. The ultrastructure of the macrogamete and young oocyst ofBarroussia schneideri inLithobius forficatus . Z. Parasitenkd. 71, 463–471 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00928349
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00928349