Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde

, Volume 61, Issue 1, pp 73–82 | Cite as

Development ofDipetalonema viteae third-stage larvae (Nematoda: Filarioidea) in micropore chambers implanted into jirds, hamsters, normal and immunized mice

  • Reto F. Gass
  • Marcel Tanner
  • Niklaus Weiss
Original Investigations

Summary

Development of third-stage larvae ofDipetalonema viteae within subcutaneously implanted micropore chambers proceeded in all hosts tested up to the fourth-stage larvae and occasionally to adolescent worms. In the jird the timing of development was comparable to a natural infection. Although the mouse is an insusceptible host, larval development could take place, but was very slow. Two intraperitoneal inoculations of living thirdstage larvae into mice induced the production of antibodies against the larval cuticle and against common antigens. In such immune mice the development of third- and fourth-stage larvae within micropore chambers was significantly inhibited, larval mortality was increased, and the larval motility was impaired.

Key words

Dipetalonema viteae Development of Filarioidea Parasite immunology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chabaud, A. G.: Sur le cycle évolutif des spirurides et de nématodes ayant une biologie comparable. XVIII.Dipetalonema blanci, Chabaud 1952. Ann. Parasitol. Hum. Comp.29, 238–249 (1954)Google Scholar
  2. Chen, S.N., Howells, R.E.: The uptake in vitro of dyes, monosaccharides and amino acids by the filarial wormBrugia pahangi. Parasitology78, 343–354 (1979a)Google Scholar
  3. Chen, S.N., Howells, R.E.:Brugia pahangi: Uptake and incorporation of adenosine and thymidine. Exp. Parasitol.47, 209–221 (1979b)Google Scholar
  4. Higashi, G.I., Chowdhury, A.B.: In vitro adhesion of eosinophils to infective larvae ofWuchereria bancrofti. Immunology19, 65–83 (1970)Google Scholar
  5. Johnson, M.H., Orihel, T.C., Beaver, P.C.:Dipetalonema viteae in the experimentally infected jird,Meriones unguiculatus. I. Insemination, development from egg to microfilaria, reinsemination, and longevity of mated and unmated worms. J. Parasitol.60, 302–309 (1974)Google Scholar
  6. Orihel, T.C.: Morphology of the larval stages ofDirofilaria immitis in the dog. J. Parasitol.47, 251–262 (1961)Google Scholar
  7. Pudney, M., Varma, M.G.R.: Present state of knowledge of in vitro cultivation of filariae. WHO/ILRAD Workshop: Nairobi, Working paper14 (1979)Google Scholar
  8. Sachs, L.: Der U-Test bei Rangaufteilung. In: Angewandte Statistik, Sachs, L., pp. 235–238, 5th edition, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer-Verlag 1978Google Scholar
  9. Weiss, N.: Studies onDipetalonema viteae (Filarioidea). 1. Microfilaraemia in hamsters in relation to worm burden and humoral immune response. Acta Trop. (Basel)35, 137–150 (1978)Google Scholar
  10. Weiss, N., Tanner, M.: Studies onDipetalonema viteae (Filarioidea). 3. Antibody-dependent cellmediated destruction of microfilariae in vivo. Tropenmed. Parasitol.30, 73–80 (1979)Google Scholar
  11. Wong, M.M., Guest, M.F., Lavoipierre, M.M.J.:Dirofilaria immitis: Fate and immunogenicity of irradiated infective stage larvae in beagles. Exp. Parasitol.35, 465–474 (1974)Google Scholar
  12. Worms, M.J., Terry, R.J., Terry, A.:Dipetalonema witei, filarial parasite of the jird,Meriones libycus. I. Maintenance in the laboratory. J. Parasitol.47, 963–970 (1961)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reto F. Gass
    • 1
  • Marcel Tanner
    • 1
  • Niklaus Weiss
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MedicineSwiss Tropical InstituteBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations