Abstract
This paper focuses on blaming, which is the commonest of the three major forms of pathogenic relating the writer has observed in family interviews (the other two being silencing and a style of relating in which certain values strictly dominate over others). Case examples of blaming and the harmful consequences that may follow are presented. Not all blaming is pathogenic, but all blaming reflects a polarization of values in which tensions are increased and the threshold of aggression is lowered. Commonplace examples are given in which blaming has led to lethal assault, and in which it is believed to have led to emotional and/or behavioral disturbance in individuals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, A. In H. L. Ansbacher and R. R. Ansbacher (Eds.),The individual psychology of Alfred Adler: A systematic presentation in selections from his writings. New York: Basic Books, 1956.
Erikson, E.Childhood and society. New York: Norton, 1950.
Sullivan, H. S. In H. S. Perry and M. L. Gawel (Eds.),The interpersonal theory of psychiatry, vol. 1. New York: Norton, 1953.
Zuk, G. H. On the pathology of silencing strategies.Family Process, 1965,5, 32–49.
Zuk, G. H. Family therapy: clinical hodgepodge or clinical science?Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 1976,2, 299–303.
Zuk, G. H. Style of relating as pathogenic relating: A family case study.International Journal of Family Therapy, 1981,3, 16–28.
Zuk, G. H. “Ordinary People” and the truncated nuclear family.International Journal of Family Therapy, 1982,4, 23–30.
Zuk, G. H. Toward a value diffusion theory of depression.International Journal of Family Therapy, 1983,5, 155–167.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zuk, G.H. On the pathology of blaming. International Journal of Family Therapy 6, 143–155 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00926927
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00926927