Advertisement

Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde

, Volume 62, Issue 1, pp 31–38 | Cite as

Some observations onHaemohormidium cotti Henry 1910, from the marine fishCottus bubalis euphrasen

  • Angela J. Davies
Original Investigations

Abstract

Haemohormidium cotti, an organism of uncertain status, is redescribed from one of its type hosts, the marine fish,Cottus bubalis. The parasite occurs as irregularly round, oval, or elongate, intraerythrocytic bodies within blood and tissue preparations. Electron micrographs show features which suggest thatH. cotti may, as previously suspected, belong with the Piroplasmasida but no firm evidence of this is established. Possible division stages are identified in both light and electron micrographs. The taxonomic position ofHaemohormidium is discussed.

Key words

Haemohormidium cotti Light microscopy Electron microscopy Taxonomy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, C.D.: Haematozoa of fishes, with emphasis on North American records. In: A symposium on disease of fishes and shellfishes, S.F. Snieszko, ed., pp. 82–100. Washington, D.C.: Special publications No. 5. American Fisheries Society 1970Google Scholar
  2. Brumpt, E.: Précis de parasitology, 6th ed. Paris: Masson et Cie 1949Google Scholar
  3. Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya, I.E., Gusev, A.V., Dubinina, M.N., Izyumova, N.A., Smirnova, T.S. Sokolovskaya, I.L., Shtein, G.A., Shulman, S.S., Epshtein, V.M.: Key to parasites of freshwater fish of the U.S.S.R. Jerusalem: S. Monson 1964Google Scholar
  4. Davies, A.J.: Coccidian parasites of intertidal fishes from Wales: systematics, development and cytochemistry. J. Protozool.25, 15–21 (1978)Google Scholar
  5. Davies, A.J., Johnston, M.R.L.: The biology ofHaemogregarina bigemina Laveran and Mesnil, a parasite of the marine fishBlennius pholis Linnaeus. J. Protozool.23, 315–320 (1976)Google Scholar
  6. Fay, F.H., Rausch, R.L.: Parasitic organisms in the blood of arvicoline rodents in Alaska. J. Parasitol.55, 1258–1265 (1969)Google Scholar
  7. Friedhoff, K.T., Scholtyseck, E.: Fine structural identification of erythrocytic stages ofBabesia bigemina, B. divergens, andB. ovis. Protistologica13, 195–204 (1977)Google Scholar
  8. Henry, H.: On the haemoprotozoa of British sea-fish (a preliminary note). J. Pathol. Bacteriol.14, 463–465 (1910)Google Scholar
  9. Henry, H.: A summary of the blood parasites of British sea-fish. J. Pathol. Bacteriol.18, 218–223 (1913a)Google Scholar
  10. Henry, H.: An intracorpuscular parasite in the blood ofCottus bubalis andCottus scorpius. J. Pathol. Bacteriol.18, 224–227 (1913b)Google Scholar
  11. Henry, H.: The granule shedding ofHaemogregarina simondi. J. Pathol. Bacteriol.18, 240–249 (1913c)Google Scholar
  12. Jakowska, S., Nigrelli, R.F.:Babesiosoma gen. nov. and other babesioids in erythrocytes of cold-blood vertebrates. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.64, 112–127 (1956)Google Scholar
  13. Johnston, M.R.L.: Distribution ofPirhemocyton Chatton and Blanc and other, possibly related, infections of poikilotherms. J. Protozool.22, 529–535 (1975)Google Scholar
  14. Kay, D.H.: Techniques for electron microscopy, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications 1965Google Scholar
  15. Laird, M., Bullock, W.L.: Marine fish haematozoa from New Brunswick and New England. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada26, 1075–1102 (1969)Google Scholar
  16. Levine, N.D.: Taxonomy of the piroplasms. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc.90, 2–33 (1971)Google Scholar
  17. Mackerras, M.J., Mackerras, I.M.: The haematozoa of Australian frogs and fish. Aust. J. Zool.9, 123–139 (1961)Google Scholar
  18. Peters, W., Garnham, P.C.C., Killick-Kendrick, R., Rajapaksa, N., Cheong, W.H., Cadigan, F.C.: Malaria of the orang-utan (Pongo pynaeus) in Borneo. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond.275, 439–482 (1976)Google Scholar
  19. Poisson, R.: Protistes parasites, intra- ou extra-cellulaires, d'affinités incertaines. In: Traité de zoologie. Anatomie, systématique, biologie, Vol. I, Protozoaire, P.-P. Grassé, ed., pp. 976–1005, Paris: Masson et Cie 1953Google Scholar
  20. Scholtyseck, E.: Ultrastructure. In: The coccidia.Eimeria, Isospora, Toxoplasma, and related genera, D.M. Hammond and P.L. Long, eds., pp. 81–144. London: Butterworth 1973Google Scholar
  21. So, B.K.F.: Marine fish haematozoa from Newfoundland waters. Can. J. Zool.50, 543–554 (1972)Google Scholar
  22. Srivastava, L.P.: Three new leeches (Piscicolidae) from marine shore fishes (Cottidae) in British waters. J. Zool.150, 297–318 (1966)Google Scholar
  23. Toit, P.J. du: A new piroplasm (Sauroplasma thomasi n.g., n.sp.) of a lizard (Zonurus giganteus, Smith). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. Anl. Indust.9, 289–299 (1937)Google Scholar
  24. Wenyon, C.M.: Protozoology. A manual for medical men, veterinaries and zoologists. Vol. 2, pp. 779–1563. London: Baillière, Tindall, and Cox 1926Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela J. Davies
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity College of WalesAberystwythWales, U.K.

Personalised recommendations