Empirica

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 157–186 | Cite as

Experimental economics: An introduction

  • David J. Butler
  • John D. Hey
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anand, P., “Are the Preference Axioms Really Rational?”, Theory and Decision, 1987, 19.Google Scholar
  2. Appleby, L., Starmer, C., “Theories of Individual Choice Under Uncertainty: A Review of Experimental Evidence, Past and Present”, in Hey, J., Lambert, P. (Eds.), Surveys in Economics of Uncertainty, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1987.Google Scholar
  3. Bartos, O., “Is Toughness Profitable?”, in Sauermann, H. (Ed.), Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol. 3, J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen, 1972.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, D., “Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty”, Operations Research, 1982, 30, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
  5. Berg, C., Individuelle Entscheidungsprozesse: Laborexperimente und Computersimulation, Wiesbaden, 1973.Google Scholar
  6. Berg, C., “Individual Decisions Concerning the Allocation of Resources for Projects with Uncertain Consequences”, Management Science, 1974, 21, pp. 98–105.Google Scholar
  7. Bolle, F., Das Problem des Optimalen Stoppens, Modelle und Experimente, Peter D. Lang, Frankfurt am Main, 1979.Google Scholar
  8. Bolle, F., “Learning to Make Good Predictions for the Following Value in a Time Series”, in Tietz, R., et al. (Eds.), Bounded Rational Behaviour in Experimental Games and Markets, Springer, Heidelberg, 1987.Google Scholar
  9. Brubaker, E., “Sixty Eight Per Cent Free Revelation and Thirty Two Per Cent Free Ride?”, in Smith, V. L. (Ed.), Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 2, 1982, pp. 151–166.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, D. J., Loomes, G. (1987A), Procedural Rationality in Consumer Choice: An Experimental Investigation, University of York, 1987 (mimeo).Google Scholar
  11. Butler, D. J., Loomes, G. (1987B), Decision Difficulty and the Band of Indifference, University of York, 1987 (mimeo).Google Scholar
  12. Chamberlin, E., “An Experimental Imperfect Market”, Journal of Political Economy, 1948, 56, pp. 95–108.Google Scholar
  13. Chew, S., McCrimmon, K., “Alpha-nu Choice Theory: A Generalisation of Expected Utility Theory”, University of British Columbia, Working Paper, 1979, (669).Google Scholar
  14. Coase, R., “The Problem of Social Cost”, Journal of Law and Economics, 1960, 3, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
  15. Colman, A., Game Theory and Experimental Games: The Study of Strategic Interaction, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1982.Google Scholar
  16. Coppinger, V., Smith, V. L., Titus, J., “Incentives and Behaviour in English, Dutch and Sealed-Bid Auctions”, Economic Inquiry, 1980, 18, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
  17. Coursey, D., Isaac, R. M., Luke, M., Smith, V. L., “Market Contestability in the Presence of Sunk Costs”, Rand Journal of Economics, 1984, 15, pp. 69–84.Google Scholar
  18. Coursey, D., Smith, V. L., “Price Controls in a Posted-Offer Market”, American Economic Review 1983, 73, pp. 218–221.Google Scholar
  19. Demsetz, H., “Why Regulate Utilities?”, Journal of Law and Economics, 1968, 11, pp. 55–65.Google Scholar
  20. Dobbs, I., Precision Theory: A Bayesian Analysis of Choice under Risk and Uncertainty, University of Newcastle, 1987 (mimeo).Google Scholar
  21. Easly, D., Ledyard, J., Simultaneous Double-Oral Auction Markets, Paper presented at the Public Choice Society Meeting, Charlestown, S. C., 1979.Google Scholar
  22. Fishburn, P., “Nontransitive Measurable Utility”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1982, 26, pp. 31–67.Google Scholar
  23. Fouraker, L., Siegel, S., Bargaining Behaviour, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
  24. Friedman, J., “An Experimental Study of Cooperative Duopoly” Econometrica, 1967, 35, pp. 379–397.Google Scholar
  25. Friedman, J., “On Experimental Research in Oligopoly”, Review of Economic Studies, 1969, 36, pp. 399–415.Google Scholar
  26. Goldstein, W., Einhorn, H., “Expression Theory and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon”, Psychological Review, 1987, 94, pp. 236–254.Google Scholar
  27. Grether, D., Plott, C., “Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon”, American Economic Review, 1979, 69, pp. 623–638.Google Scholar
  28. Grether, D., Plott, C., “The Effects of Market Practices in Oligopolistic Markets: An Experimental Examination of the Ethyl Case”, Economic Inquiry, 1984, 22, pp. 429–507.Google Scholar
  29. Grossmann, H., Entscheidungsverhalten auf unvollkommenen Märkten, Barndio & Hess, Frankfurt am Main, 1982.Google Scholar
  30. Hall, R., “Stochastic Implications of the Lifecycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence”, Journal of Political Economy, 1978, 86, pp. 971–987.Google Scholar
  31. Hasselbarth, V., Der Geldmarkt der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Eine experimentelle Untersuchung, Berlin, 1970.Google Scholar
  32. Hayek, F., “The Use of Knowledge in Society”, American Economic Review, 1945, 35, pp. 519–530.Google Scholar
  33. Hey, J. D., “Search for Rules for Search”, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 1982, 3, pp. 65–81.Google Scholar
  34. Hey, J. D. (1987A), “A Preliminary Investigation of a Large Scale Experimental Study of Optimal Consumption Under Uncertainty”, in Tietz, R., et al. (Eds.), Bounded Rational Behaviour in Experimental Games and Markets, Springer, Heidelberg, 1987.Google Scholar
  35. Hey, J. D. (1987B), “Still Searching”, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 1987, 8, pp. 137–144.Google Scholar
  36. Hoffman, E., Spitzer, M., “The Coase Theorem: Some Experimental Tests”, Journal of Law and Economics, 1982, 25, pp. 73–98.Google Scholar
  37. Hoggatt, A., “Response of Paid Subjects to Differential Behaviour of Robots in Bifurcated Duopoly Games”, Review of Economic Studies, 1969, 36, pp. 417–432.Google Scholar
  38. Hong, J., Plott, C., “Rate Filing Policies for Inland Water Transportation: An Experimental Approach”, Bell Journal of Economics, 1982, 13, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  39. Isaac, R. M., Plott, C., “Price Controls and the Behaviour of Auction Markets: An Experimental Examination”, American Economic Review, 1981, 71, pp. 448–459.Google Scholar
  40. Isaac, R. M., Walker, J., Success and Failure of the Voluntary Contributions Process: Some Evidence from Experimental Economics, Paper presented at the Liberty Fund Conference on the Ethics and Economics of Charity, San Diego, 1987.Google Scholar
  41. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk”, Econometrica, 1979, 47, pp. 263–291.Google Scholar
  42. Knez, P., Smith, V. L., Williams, A., “Individual Rationality, Market Rationality and Value Estimation”, American Economic Review, 1985, 75, pp. 397–402.Google Scholar
  43. Levin, I., Johnson, R., Davis, M., “How Information Frame Influences Risky Decisions: Between-subject and Within-subject Comparisons”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 1987, 8, pp. 43–54.Google Scholar
  44. Loomes, G., Systematic Violations of the Independence Axiom: Measuring and Explaining the Common Ratio Effect, University of York, 1986 (mimeo).Google Scholar
  45. Loomes, G. (1987A), “Testing for Regret and Disappointment in Choice Under Uncertainty”, Economic Journal, Conference Supplement, 1987, 97, pp. 118–129.Google Scholar
  46. Loomes, G. (1987B), “Further Evidence of the Impact of Regret and Disappointment in Choice Under Uncertainty”, Economica, 1987, 55, pp. 47–62.Google Scholar
  47. Loomes, G., Sugden, R., “Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty”, Economic Journal, 1982, 92, pp. 805–824.Google Scholar
  48. Loomes, G., Sugden, R., “A Rationale for Preference Reversal”, American Economic Review, 1983, 73, pp. 428–433.Google Scholar
  49. Loomes, G., Sugden, R., “The Importance of What Might Have Been”, in Hagen, O., Wenstop, E. (Eds.), Progress in Utility and Risk Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984, pp. 219–235.Google Scholar
  50. Loomes, G., Sugden, R., “Disappointment and Dynamic Consistency in Choice Under Uncertainty”, Review of Economic Studies, 1986, 53, pp. 271–282.Google Scholar
  51. McCrimmon, K., Smith, M. (1986A), “Imprecise Equivalences: Preference Reversals in Money and Probability”, University of British Columbia, Working Paper, 1986, (1211).Google Scholar
  52. McCrimmon, K., Smith, M. (1986B), “Fundamental Preference Reversals”, University of British Columbia, Working Paper, 1986, (1218).Google Scholar
  53. McCrimmon, K., Smith, M., “Transaction Reversals: Buying and Selling Lotteries”, University of British Columbia, Working Paper, 1987, (1230).Google Scholar
  54. Machina, M., “‘Expected Utility’ Analysis Without the Independence Axiom”, Econometrica, 1982, 50, pp. 277–323.Google Scholar
  55. Machina, M., “The Economic Theory of Individual Behaviour Toward Risk”, Stanford University, Technical Report, 1983, (433).Google Scholar
  56. Nemeth, C., “A Critical Analysis of Research Utilising the Prisoners Dilemma and other Mixed-Motive Games”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1972, 15, pp. 225–259.Google Scholar
  57. Packard, D. J., “Cyclical Preference Logic”, Theory and Decision, 1982, 14, pp. 415–426.Google Scholar
  58. Plott, C., “Externalities and Corrective Policies in Experimental Markets”, Economic Journal, 1983, 93, pp. 106–127.Google Scholar
  59. Plott, C., Smith, V. L., “An Experimental Examination of Two Exchange Institutions”, Review of Economic Studies, 1978, 45, pp. 133–153.Google Scholar
  60. Plott, C., Sunder, S., “Experimental Securities Markets”, Journal of Political Economy, 1982, 90, pp. 663–698.Google Scholar
  61. Prudencio, Y., “The Voluntary Approach to Externality Problems: An Experiment”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1982, 9, pp. 213–228.Google Scholar
  62. Pruitt, D., Kimmel, M., “Twenty Years of Experimental Gaming: Critique, Synthesis, and Suggestions for the Future”, Annual Review of Psychology, 1977, 28, pp. 363–392.Google Scholar
  63. Roth, A., “Laboratory Experimentation in Economics”, Economics and Philosophy, 1986, 2, pp. 245–273.Google Scholar
  64. Roth, A., Murnighan, J., “The Role of Information in Bargaining: An Experimental Study”, Econometrica, 1982, 50, pp. 1123–1142.Google Scholar
  65. Roth, A., Schoumaker, F., “Expectations and Reputations in Bargaining: An Experimental Study”, American Economic Review, 1983, 73, pp. 362–372.Google Scholar
  66. Samuelson, P., “Intertemporal Price Equilibrium: A prologue to the Theory of Speculation”, in: Collected Papers of P. Samuelson, Vol. II, M. I. T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1966, pp. 946–984.Google Scholar
  67. Sauermann, H. (Ed.), Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol. 2, J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen, 1970.Google Scholar
  68. Sauermann, H. (Ed.), Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol. 3, J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen, 1972.Google Scholar
  69. Schneider, F., Pommerehne, W., “Free-Riding and Collective Action: An Experiment in Public Microeconomics”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1981, 96, pp. 689–704.Google Scholar
  70. Selten, R., “Equal Share Analysis of Characteristic Function Experiments”, in Sauermann, H. (Ed.), Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol. 3, J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen, 1972.Google Scholar
  71. Simon, H. A., “A Behavioural Model of Rational Choice”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1955, 69, pp. 99–118.Google Scholar
  72. Simon, H. A., “Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioural Science”, American Economic Review, 1959, 49, pp. 253–283.Google Scholar
  73. Slovic, P., Tversky, A., “Who Accepts Savages' Axiom?”, Behavioural Science, 1974, 19, pp. 368–373.Google Scholar
  74. Smith, V. L., “An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behaviour”, Journal of Political Economy, 1962, 70, pp. 111–137.Google Scholar
  75. Smith, V. L., “Effect of Market Organisation on Competitive Equilibrium”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1964, 78, pp. 181–201.Google Scholar
  76. Smith, V. L., “Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory”, American Economic Review, 1976, 66, pp. 274–279.Google Scholar
  77. Smith, V. L., “An Empirical Study of Decentralized Institutions of Monopoly Restraint”, in: Essays in Contemporary Fields in Economics, Horwich & Quirk, Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, 1981, pp. 83–106.Google Scholar
  78. Smith, V. L., “Markets as Economisers of Information: Experimental Examination of the Hayek Hypothesis”, Economic Inquiry, 1982, 20, pp. 165–179.Google Scholar
  79. Smith, V. L., “Experimental Methods in the Political Economy of Exchange”, Science, 1986, 234, pp. 167–173.Google Scholar
  80. Smith, V. L., Williams, A. (1981A), “On Non-Binding Price Controls in a Competitive Market”, American Economic Review, 1981, 71, pp. 467–474.Google Scholar
  81. Smith, V. L., Williams, A. (1981B), The Boundaries of Competitive Price Theory, Paper presented at the Public Choice Society Meeting, New Orleans, La., 1981.Google Scholar
  82. Smith, V. L., Williams, A., “The Effects of Rent Asymmetries in Experimental Auction Markets”, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 1982, 3, pp. 99–116.Google Scholar
  83. Sugden, R., “New Developments in the Theory of Choice Under Uncertainty”, Bulletin of Economic Research, 1986, 38, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  84. Tietz, R., Weber, H., “On the Nature of the Bargaining Process in the Kresko Game” in Sauermann, H. (Ed.), Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol. 3, J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen, 1972.Google Scholar
  85. Tullock, G., “The Rationality of Transitivity”, Oxford Economic Papers, 1964, 16, pp. 401–406.Google Scholar
  86. Tversky, A., “Intransitivity of Preferences”, Psychological Review, 1969, 76, pp. 31–48.Google Scholar
  87. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions”, Journal of Business, Special Supplement, 1986, 59, pp. 251–278.Google Scholar
  88. Vickrey, W., “Counterspeculation, Auctions and Competitive Sealed Tenders”, Journal of Finance, 1961, 16, pp. 8–37.Google Scholar
  89. Wilde, L., “On the Use of Laboratory Experiments in Economics”, in Pitt, J. (Ed.), Philosophy in Economics, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1981, pp. 137–148.Google Scholar
  90. Williams, A., “Intertemporal Competitive Equilibrium: On Further Experimental Results”, in Smith, V. L. (Ed.), Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 1, 1979, pp. 255–278.Google Scholar
  91. Williams, A., “The Formation of Price Forecasts in Experimental Markets”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1987, 19, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  92. Williams, A., Smith, V. L., “Cyclical Double-Auction Markets With and Without Speculators”, Journal of Business, 1984, 57, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
  93. Williams, F., “The Effect of Market Organisation on Competitive Equilibrium: The Multi-Unit Case”, Review of Economic Studies, 1973, 40, pp. 97–113.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gustav Fischer 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Butler
    • 1
  • John D. Hey
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Experimental Economics Department of Economics and Related StudiesUniversity of YorkYorkEngland

Personalised recommendations