, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 85–110 | Cite as

Innovative activity and industrial structure

  • Klaus F. Zimmermann


Economic Growth International Economic Industrial Organization Industrial Structure Innovative Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arrow, K., “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Inventions”, in Nelson, R. R. (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J., 1962.Google Scholar
  2. Ben-Zion, U., Kim, M., “Profit Cost Margin, Monopoly Power and R&D Intensity for Industrial Firms”, Economics Letters, 1983, 12, pp. 355–359.Google Scholar
  3. Dasgupta, P., Stiglitz, J., “Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity”, Economic Journal, 1980, 90, pp. 266–293.Google Scholar
  4. Griliches, Z., “Productivity, R&D, and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970's”, American Economic Review, 1986, 76, pp. 141–152.Google Scholar
  5. Iwai, K., “Schumpeterian Dynamics. An Evolutionary Model of Innovation and Imitation”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1984A, 5, pp. 159–190.Google Scholar
  6. Iwai, K., “Schumpeterian Dynamics. Technological Progress, Firm Growth and ‘Economic Selection’”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1984B, 5, pp. 321–351.Google Scholar
  7. Kamien, N. I., Schwartz, N. L., “Market Structure and Innovation: A Survey”, Journal of Economic Literature, 1975, 13, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
  8. Kamien, N. I., Schwartz, N. L., Market Structure and Innovation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982.Google Scholar
  9. Kaufer, E., Industrieökonomik, Verlag Franz Vahlen, München, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. Link, A. N., “Firms Size and Efficient Entrepreneurial Activity: A Reformulation of the Schumpeter Hypothesis”, Journal of Political Economy, 1980, 88, pp. 771–782.Google Scholar
  11. Monopolkommission, Hauptgutachten 1980/81, Fortschritte bei der Konzentrationserfassung, Nomos-Verlag, Baden-Baden, 1982.Google Scholar
  12. Nelson, R., Winter, S., An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1982.Google Scholar
  13. Neumann, M., Böbel, I., Haid, A., “Innovations and Market Structure in West German Industries”, Managerial and Decision Economics, 1982, 3, pp. 131–139.Google Scholar
  14. Scherer, F. M., Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Rand McNally, 2nd Ed., Chicago, 1980.Google Scholar
  15. Scherer, F. M., Innovation and Growth. Schumpeterian Perspectives, M. I. T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1984.Google Scholar
  16. Schumpeter, J. A., Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper & Row, New York, 1942.Google Scholar
  17. Statistisches Bundesamt, Statistisches Jahrbuch, Kohlammer-Verlag, Stuttgart, various issues.Google Scholar
  18. Strigel, W. H., “Die Konjunkturumfragen des Ifo-Instituts für Wirtschaftsforschung”, Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv, 1965, 49, pp. 129–163.Google Scholar
  19. Theil, H., Economics and Information Theory, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1967.Google Scholar
  20. Winter, S. G., “Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1984, 5, pp. 287–320.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gustav Fischer 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus F. Zimmermann
    • 1
  1. 1.Seminar für Arbeits- und Bevölkerungsökonomie Volkswirtschaftliche FakultätUniversität MünchenMünchen 22Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Personalised recommendations