Skip to main content
Log in

Body movement and inattention in learning-disable and normal children

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four experiments were conducted to test various aspects of an optimal level of arousal model of hyperactivity in learning-disabled children. Vigilance performance and level of body movement were measured while learning-disabled and control children performed in an auditory vigilance task. The results suggested that body movement increased throughout the vigilance task, increased rates of external stimulation result in decreased level of body movement, and learningdisabled children differed from controls in showing higher levels of body movement and poorer vigilance performance. The results were discussed in terms of changes in arousal level and compensatory stimulus-seeking behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Halcomb, & Doyle. The measurement of attentional deficits.Exceptional Children, 1973,39(7), 534–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E.Conflict, arousal and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykman, R. A., Ackerman, P. T., Clements, S. D., & Peters, J. E. Specific learning disabilities: An attentional deficit syndrome. In H. Myklebust (Ed.),Progress in learning disabilities, New York: Grune & Stratton, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, D. W., & Maddi, S. R.Functions of varied experience. Homewood, Illinois: Dorsey, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, E. J., Johnson, L. C., & Keefe, F. B. Electrodermal and cardiovascular responses in nonreaders.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1972,5, 187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, L. Motor activity in brain injured children.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1970,40, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quay, H. C. Psychopathic behavior: Reflections on its nature, origins and treatment. In F. Weizman & I. Uzgiris (Eds.),The Structuring of Experience, New York: Plenum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugel, R. P., & Rosenthal, R. Skin conductance, reaction time and observational ratings in learning disabled children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1974,2(3), 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, D. P.Sensory restriction-effects on behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sroufe, L. A., Sonies, B. C., West, W. D., & Wright, F. S. Anticipatory heart rate deceleration and reaction time in children with and without referral for learning disability.Child Development, 1973,44, 267–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroh, C. M.Vigilance: The problem of sustained attention. New York: Pergamon Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall, S. Optimal stimulation as theoretical basis of hyperactivity.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1975,45(4), 549–563.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rugel, R.P., Cheatam, D. & Mitchell, A. Body movement and inattention in learning-disable and normal children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 6, 325–337 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00924735

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00924735

Keywords

Navigation