Skip to main content
Log in

Theories of family pathology: In what direction

  • Published:
International Journal of Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although specific typologies, classifications, or taxonomies of family pathology have been demonstrated to have research merit, it is clear that their practical or clinical application has been at best marginal. The general theories in family therapy have not yet led to the development of viable typologies.

I believe there are three general theories which perhaps converge only in their acceptance of a process of victimization in families that may lead to the outbreak of psychiatric symptoms in members: the intergenerational, the communicational, and scapegoat theory. The paper describes these theories and suggests their strengths and limitations. The dominant family therapies that have arisen in the late 1970s are short-term approaches. These are especially favorable to the development of scapegoat theory, fit reasonably well with communicational theory, but are inconsistent with intergenerational theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An invited lecture at the 11th International Congress of Psychotherapy in Amsterdam, August 28, 1979.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zuk, G.H. Theories of family pathology: In what direction. International Journal of Family Therapy 1, 356–361 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00924455

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00924455

Keywords

Navigation