Abstract
Although specific typologies, classifications, or taxonomies of family pathology have been demonstrated to have research merit, it is clear that their practical or clinical application has been at best marginal. The general theories in family therapy have not yet led to the development of viable typologies.
I believe there are three general theories which perhaps converge only in their acceptance of a process of victimization in families that may lead to the outbreak of psychiatric symptoms in members: the intergenerational, the communicational, and scapegoat theory. The paper describes these theories and suggests their strengths and limitations. The dominant family therapies that have arisen in the late 1970s are short-term approaches. These are especially favorable to the development of scapegoat theory, fit reasonably well with communicational theory, but are inconsistent with intergenerational theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An invited lecture at the 11th International Congress of Psychotherapy in Amsterdam, August 28, 1979.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zuk, G.H. Theories of family pathology: In what direction. International Journal of Family Therapy 1, 356–361 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00924455
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00924455