Skip to main content
Log in

Areas of resistance in the beginning phase of family therapy

  • Published:
International Journal of Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When family therapy is undertaken with a family that seeks treatment for a child as an “identified patient”, gaining access to the family is often a venture fraught with anxiety and considerable resistance. At the beginning of family therapy, the risk of losing families is probably the greatest, yet little research directed at the problems involved has been reported. To encourage more interest, this phase is explored from the perspective of therapist behavior. Three areas are examined, and consideration is given to the strategies and techniques used to reduce resistance and facilitate engagement in treatment. Research needs are pointed out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, S. and Russel, C. Utilizing process and content in designing paradoxical interventions.American Journal of Family Therapy, Summer 1982,10(2), 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andolfi, M. Redefinition in family therapy.American Journal of Family Therapy, Spring 1979,7(1), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B. and Rosenblum, N. Fathers in family therapy.The Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, April 1977,3(2), 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burck, C. A study of families' expectations and experiences of a child guidance clinic.British Journal of Social Work, 1978,8, 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. and Koss, M. Research on brief and crisis-oriented therapies. In: S. Garfield and A. Bergen (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior chage. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978, 725–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckro, P., Beal, D. and George C. Research on the effects of disconfirmed client role expectations in psychotherapy: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 1979,86, 260–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, S. Research on client variables in psychotherapy. In: A. Bergen and S. Garfield (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 1971, 271–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, J.Problem-solving therapy, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, J. Issues in the assessment of outcome in family therapy.Family Process, June 1981,20, 177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lishman, J. A clash in perspective? A study of workers' and clients' perceptions of social work.British Journal of Social Work, 1978,18, 301–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, S., Brackelmanns, W. and Newman, L. Stages in the family therapy of adoles cents.Family Process, March 1974,3 (1), 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrington, D. and Corden, J. Families' impressions of family therapy,Journal of Family Therapy, 1981,3, 243–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papp, P. The Greek chorus and other techniques of paradoxical therapy.Family Process, March 1980,19 (1), 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsof, W. Symptom/patient defocusing.American Journal of Family Therapy, Winter 1980,8 (4), 72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. The family's view.Family Therapy Networker, Nov/Dec 1981,5 (6), 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Protinsky, H., Quinn, W. and Elliott, S. Paradoxical prescriptions in family therapy: From child to marital focus.Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, January 1982,8 (1), 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sager, C., Masters, Y., Ronall, R. and Normand, W. Selection and engagement of patients in family therapy.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, July 1968,38 (4) 715–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, R. and Budman, S. Defection, termination and continuation in family and individual therapy.Family Process, March 1973,12 (1), 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, M. The staging of family therapy: An approach to developing the therapeutic alliance.The Journal of Marriage & Family Counseling, April 1977,3 (2), 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, M. Family therapy dropouts: Resistance to change.Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, 1969,14, 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szurek, S. Some principles of child guidance practice.Journal of Psychiatric Social Work, Spring 1947,16 (4), 116–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotzer, J. Engaging families in therapy: A pilot study.International Journal of Family Therapy, Spring 1982,4 (1), 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Deusen, J., Scott, S. and Stanton, M. Engaging “resistant” families in treatment. I. Getting the drug addict to recruit his family members,International Journal of the Addictions, 1980,15 (7), 1069–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, J. Family therapy: A search for foundations.Journal of Family Therapy, 1981,3, 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, C.A., Santa-Barbara, J., Levin, S. and Epstein, N. Aspects of consumer satisfaction with brief family therapy.Family Process, December 1978,17, 399–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuk, G. Value systems and psychopathology in family therapy.International Journal of Family Therapy, Summer 1979,2, 133–155.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mannino, F.V. Areas of resistance in the beginning phase of family therapy. International Journal of Family Therapy 6, 3–12 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00924360

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00924360

Keywords

Navigation