Skip to main content
Log in

Family therapy and the notion of accountability: With reference to trends in individual psychotherapy

  • Published:
International Journal of Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Family therapy both overseas and within Australia has seen a rapid rise in popularity and general acceptance as an important therapeutic intervention. Along with the growth in interest, however, has come an increased demand for accountability. The foundation stone for the accountability issue surrounds the questions of therapy efficacy. How effective is family therapy, and, indeed, if it is effective, what are the active elements or ingredients which facilitate positive client change? Three groups, in particular, have vested interests in questions relating to the effectiveness of family therapy: researchers, therapists, and consumers. Although both researchers and therapists, for a variety of reasons, have been concerned with the effectiveness of treatment for some time, it has only been relatively recently that there has been a concerted push from various sections of the consumer group, including administrators, legislators, and policy makers. The consumer group is now providing pressure on professionals as to what we have done, and are doing, to demonstrate that family therapy really “works.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baither, R.C. Family therapy with adolescent drug abusers: A review.Journal of Drug Education, 1978,8, 337–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banta, H.D., & Saxe, L. Reimbursement for psychotherapy: Linking efficacy research and public policymaking.American Psychologist, 1983,38, 918–923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becvar, R.J., Becvar, D.S., & Bender, A.E. Let us first do no harm.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1982,8, 385–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergin, A.E. The evaluation of therapeutic outcomes. In A.E. Bergin & S.L. Garfield (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, New York: Wiley, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergin, A.E. Sixty-four therapies—but who will evaluate them?Contemporary Psychology, 1982,27, 685–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caille, P., Abrahamsen, P., Girolami, C., & Sorbye, B. A systems theory approach to a case of anorexia nervosa.Family Process, 1977, 16, 455–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canevaro, A. Family therapy with psychotic patients: An institutional approach,Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1981,7, 375–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churven, P., & Durrant, M. The admission of the whole family in a psychiatry setting: A follow-up study.Australian Journal of Family Therapy, 1983,4, 153–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkin, J.F., & Glick, I.D. Recent developments in family therapy: A review.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 1982,33, 550–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., Goldenberg, I., & Goldenberg, H. Treating families of bone marrow recipients and donors.Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 1977,3, 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, D.G. Accountability in the profession: And it won't go away.Australian Clinical Psychologist, in press.

  • Cross, D.G. The evaluation of therapy. Why bother?Bulletin of the Australian Psychological Society, 1984,6, 13, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, D.G.,Overview of outcome research in family therapy: Methodological considerations.Australian Journal of Family Therapy, 1982,3, 149–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, D.G., & Gaffney, L.R. “Bad therapy” as a training technique: An empirical analysis.Australian Journal of Family Therapy, 1984,5, 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, D.G., & Sheehan, P.W. Secondary therapist variables operating in short-term insight-oriented, and behaviour therapy.British Journal of Medical Psychology, 1982,55, 275–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, D.G., Sheehan, P.W., & Khan, J.A. Alternative advice and counsel in psychotherapy.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1980,48, 615–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, D.G., Sheehan, P.W., & Khan, J.A. Short- and long-term follow-up of clients receiving insight-oriented therapy and behavior therapy.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1982,50, 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt, K.N. The effectiveness of family therapy: A review of outcome research.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1978,35, 549–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt, K.N. The effectiveness of family therapy: A review of outcome research.Advances in Family Psychiatry, 1980,2, 437–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreman, S.B., & Cohen, E.C. Children of victims of terrorist activities: A family approach to dealing with tragedy.American Journal of Family Therapy, 1982,10, 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, N.B., & Vlok, L.A. Research on the results of psychotherapy: A summary of evidence.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1981,138, 1027–1035.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, W.A. A new look at research in marital and family therapy.Journal of Family Counseling, 1976,4, 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, V.D. Family therapy. In R.J. Corsini (Ed.),Current psychotherapies (2nd ed.) Itasca, Illinois: F.E. Peacock, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauchiger, R. Matchmaker: Pairing off the right people with therapists.Human Behavior, 1978,7, 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, J. Family counseling: A new frontier for school counsellors.Canadian Counsellor, 1976,10, 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, A. Problems of outcome research in family therapy. In S. Walrond-Skinner (Ed.),Family and marital psychotherapy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, F.T. Counseling the breast cancer patient and her family.Family Therapy, 1977,4, 247–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, S.L. Yes, I have heard about family psychotherapy—but opinions are no substitute for data,American Psychologist, 1982,37, 99–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griest, D.L., & Wells, K.C. Behavioral family therapy with conduct disorders in children.Behavior Therapy, 1983,14, 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurman, A.S. Sources of influence in the family therapy field: Publication trends in three major journals.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1981,7, 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurman, A.S., & Kniskern, D.P. Research on marital and family therapy: Progress, perspective, and prospect. In S.L. Garfield & A.E. Bergin (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley, 1978a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurman, A.S., & Kniskern, D.P. Deterioration in marital and family therapy: Empirical, clinical and conceptual issues.Family Process, 1978b,17, 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurman, A.S., & Kniskern, D.P. (Eds.).Handbook of family therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1981a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurman, A.S., & Kniskern, D.P. Family therapy outcome research: Knowns and unknowns. In A.S. Gurman & D.P. Kniskern (Eds.),Handbook of family therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1981b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutheil, T.G., & Avery, N.C. Multiple overt incest as family defense against loss.Family Process, 1977,16, 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare-Mustin, R.T. Family therapy may be dangerous for your health.Professional Psychology, 1980,11, 935–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. Marital therapy: Beyond evaluation.Australian Journal of Family Therapy, 1983,4, 179–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, J. Family therapy—Review of outcome research.Australian Journal of Family Therapy, 1980,1, 116–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaslow, F.W., & Cooper, B. Family therapy with the learning disabled child and his/her family.Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 1978,4, 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, E., & Pattison, E.M. (1981) Differential methods of family therapy in the treatment of alcoholism.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1981,42, 951–971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J.F., & Elliott, S.S. Do personality changes occur in parents receiving behavioral family therapy?Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1980,6, 421–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klerman, G.L. The efficacy of psychotherapy as the basis for public policy.American Psychologist, 1983, 38, 929–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosinski, F.A. Standards, accreditation, and licensure in marital and family therapy.Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1982,60, 350–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krell, R. Family therapy with children of concentration camp survivors.American Journal of Psychotherapy, 1982,36, 513–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, J.M. The life and death of a family therapy clinic.Family Therapy 1980,7, 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, M. Bad therapy: A training technique.Australian Journal of Family Therapy, 1980,1, 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansky, M.R. Research in family therapy.Advances in Family Psychiatry 1980,2, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, J. Issues in the assessment of outcome in family therapy.Family Process 1981,20, 167–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leff, J.P. Developments in family treatment of schizophrenia.Advances in Family Psychiatry, 1980,2, 313–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubin, B., & Reddy, W.B. The group psychotherapy literature: 1976.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 1977,27, 521–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S.J. The integration of psychodrama and family therapy in the treatment of schizophrenia.Family Therapy, 1982,9, 215–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKamy, L.R. Multiple family therapy on an alcohol treatment unit.Family Therapy, 1976,3, 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midelfort, C.F. Use of family in the treatment of schizophrenic and psychopathic patients.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1982,8, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S.Families and family therapy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S., Rosman, B.L., & Baker, L.Psychosomatic families: Anorexia nervosa in context. Cambridge: Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D.H., & Russell, C.S. Marital and family therapy: A decade review.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1980,42, 973–993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orcutt, B.A. Family treatment of poverty level families.Social Casework, 1977,58, 92–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostensen, K.W. The runaway crisis: Is family therapy the answer?American Journal of Family Therapy, 1981,9, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardeck, J.T., Wolf, V., Killion, S., & Silverstein, G. Individual therapy vs family therapy: Which is more effective?Family Therapy, 1983,10, 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, G.L. Strategy of outcome research in psychotherapy.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1967,31, 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pevsner, R. Group parent training versus individual family therapy: An outcome study.Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 1982,13, 119–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock, H.A., & Cambor, C.G. Family therapy approach to incapacitating migraine.International Journal of Family Therapy, 1979,1, 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D., & Hansen, J. Working with single-parent families.Family Therapy, 1980,7, 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, A. Limitations of family therapy.Clinical Social Work Journal, 1976a,4, 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, A. Contemporary concerns in family therapy.Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 1976b,2, 243–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santa-Barbara, J., Woodward, C.A., Levin, S., Goodman, J.T., Streiner, D., & Epstein, N.B. The McMaster Family Therapy Outcome Study: An overview of methods and results.International Journal of Family Therapy, 1979,1, 304–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimel, J.L. Adolescents and families: An overview.Adolescent Psychiatry, 1979,7, 362–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. Anorexia nervosa: The “subtle” condition.Family Therapy, 1981,8, 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderman, G., & Pakes, E.H. The teaching of family therapy skills on an in-patient child psychiatry ward.Family Therapy, 1976,3, 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selig, A.L. Treating nocturnal enuresis in one session of family therapy: A case study.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 1982,11, 234–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, W.R. Values, ethics, legalities and the family therapist: III. Counselor/therapist values and therapeutic style.Family Therapy Collections, 1982,1, 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, R.J. A family therapy approach to alcoholism.Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 1977,3, 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, P.R. Separation and treatment of child-abusing families.Family Therapy, 1982,9, 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sporakowski, M.J., & Staniszewski, W.P. The regulation of marriage and family therapy: An update.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1980,6, 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stagoll, B. Conference report.Australian Journal of Family Therapy, 1982,4, 61–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strupp, H.H. Clinical research, practice, and the crisis of confidence.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1981,49, 216–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strupp, H.H., & Hadley, S.W. A tripartite model of mental health and therapeutic outcomes.American Psychologist, 1977,32, 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaxton, L., & L'Abate, L. The “second wave” and the second generation: Characteristics of new leaders in family therapy.Family Process, 1982,21, 359–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiller, J.W. Brief family therapy for childhood tic syndrome.Family Process, 1978,17, 217–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A.L. Therapy with families of a mentally retarded child.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1980,6, 167–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • VandenBos, G.R. Introduction. In G.R. VandenBos (Ed.),Psychotherapy: Practice, research, polic. London: Sage, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visher, E.B., & Visher, J.S. Therapy with remarriage families. VIII. Stepfamilies in the 1980s.Family Therapy Collections, 1982,2, 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, E.M. Family therapy and psychosomatic illness.International Journal of Family Therapy, 1980,2, 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellisch, D.K., Ro-Trock, G.K. A three year follow-up of family therapy.International Journal of Family Therapy, 1980,2, 169–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, R.A., & Dezen, A.E. The results of family therapy revisited: The nonbehavioral methods.Family Process, 1978,17, 251–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendorf, D.J. A data-based reply to Hare-Mustin on family therapy perils.Professional Psychology, 1981,12, 665–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winder, A.E. Family therapy: A necessary part of the cancer patient's care. A multi-disciplinary treatment concept.Family Therapy, 1978,5, 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winder, A.E., Greif, A.C., & Kelso, E.P. Family therapy: The single parent family and the battered child.Family Therapy, 1976,3, 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, C.A., Santa-Barbara, J., Levin, S., & Epstein, N.B. Aspects of consumer satisfaction with brief family therapy.Family Process, 1978,17, 399–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, L.C. Family research and family therapy: A reunion?Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1983,9, 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, B.T., & Newman, F.L. Findings of cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses of psychotherapy. In G.R. VandenBos (Ed.),Psychotherapy: Practice, research, policy. London: Sage, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cross, D.G. Family therapy and the notion of accountability: With reference to trends in individual psychotherapy. International Journal of Family Therapy 7, 25–37 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00924019

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00924019

Keywords

Navigation