Advertisement

American Journal of Community Psychology

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 555–560 | Cite as

A preferred route for substantive theorizing

  • Edward Seidman
Article

Keywords

Social Psychology Health Psychology Substantive Theorize Prefer Route 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barker, R. G. (1968).Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Gleick, J. (1987).Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Seidman, E. (1978). Justice, values and social science. In R. J. Simon (Ed.),Research in law and sociology (pp. 175–200). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  4. Seidman, E. (1983). Unexamined premises of social problem solving. In E. Seidman (Ed.),Handbook of social intervention (pp. 48–67). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Seidman, E. (1987). Toward a framework for primary prevention research. In J. A. Steinberg & M. M. Silverman (Eds.),Preventing mental disorders: A research perspective (pp. 2–19). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  6. Seidman, E. (1988). Back to the future, community psychology: Unfolding a theory of social intervention.American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 3–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Seidman, E. (in press). Pursuing the meaning and utility of social regularities for community psychology. In P. Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, & L. A. Jason (Eds.),Researching community psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward Seidman
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Community Research and ActionNew York UniversityNew York

Personalised recommendations