Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 361–379 | Cite as

Relative efficacy of methylphenidate and behavior modification in hyperkinetic children: An interim report

  • Rachel Gittelman-Klein
  • Donald F. Klein
  • Howard Abikoff
  • Sidney Katz
  • Audrey C. Gloisten
  • Wendy Kates
Article

Abstract

Children reported to be hyperactive in school and with behavior difficulties at home were randomly assigned to methylphenidate, behavior therapy and placebo, or behavior therapy with methylphenidate for an 8-week period. Rating scales were obtained from teachers and parents. Independent blind observers rated childrens' classroom behavior on a weekly basis. A behavior therapy program was implemented in the home and at school. Methylphenidate dosage was individualized. Ratings of behavior deviance were significantly reduced by all treatments. However, a significant advantage for the groups receiving methylphenidate was found over the group receiving behavior therapy and placebo. No significant differences between methylphenidate alone and methylphenidate combined with behavior therapy were obtained. Global ratings of improvement done by teachers favored the combined treatment of behavior therapy and methylphenidate over behavior therapy and placebo. No differences among treatments were found in the mothers' global ratings of improvement. The results indicate that though all three treatments were effective, methylphenidate was significantly superior to behavior therapy alone.

Keywords

Placebo Combine Treatment Behavior Therapy Methylphenidate Global Rating 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference notes

  1. Abikoff, H., Gittelman-Klein, R., & Klein, D. F. Validation of a classroom observation code for hyperactive children. Manuscript, submitted for publication, 1976.Google Scholar
  2. Gittelman-Klein, R. A preliminary report of the efficacy of methylphenidate and behavior therapy in hyperactive children. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of The American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, San Juan, Puerto Rico, December 1975.Google Scholar

References

  1. Ayllon, T., Layman, D., & Kandel, H. J. A behavioral-educational alternative to drug control of hyperactive children.Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 1975,8, 137–146.Google Scholar
  2. Blunden, D., Spring, C., & Greenberg, L. M. Validation of the classroom behavior inventory.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974,42, 84–88.Google Scholar
  3. Christensen, D. E. Effects of combining methylphenidate and a classroom token system in modifying hyperactive behavior.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1975,80, 266–276.Google Scholar
  4. Conners, C. K. A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1969,126, 152–156.Google Scholar
  5. Doubros, S. G., & Daniels, G. T. An experimental approach to the reduction of overactive behavior.Behavior Research and Therapy, 1966,4, 251–258.Google Scholar
  6. Douglas, V. I. Are drugs enough? To treat or to train the hyperactive child.International Journal of Mental Health, 1975,4, 199–212.Google Scholar
  7. Eysenck, N. T., & Rachman, S. T. The application of learning theory to child psychiatry. In T. C. Howells (Ed.),Modern perspectives in child psychiatry. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1971. Pp. 104–169.Google Scholar
  8. Gittelman-Klein, R., & Klein, D. F. Are behavioral and psychometric changes related in methylphenidate-treated children?International Journal of Mental Health, 1975,4, 182–198.Google Scholar
  9. Gittelman-Klein, R., Klein, D. F., Katz, S., Saraf, K., & Pollack, E. Comparative effects of methylphenidate and thioridazine in hyperkinetic children. I. Clinical results.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1976 (in press).Google Scholar
  10. Grinspoon, L., & Singer, S. B. Amphetamine in the treatment of hyperkinetic children.Harvard Educational Review, 1973,43, 515–554.Google Scholar
  11. O'Leary, K. D., Becker, W. C., Evans, M. B., & Saudargas, R. Z. A token reinforcement program in a public school: A replication and systematic analysis.Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 1969,2, 3–13.Google Scholar
  12. O'Leary, K. D., & Drabman, R. Token reinforcement programs in the classroom.Psychological Bulletin, 1971,75, 379–398.Google Scholar
  13. O'Leary, K. D., & O'Leary, S. G.Classroom management in the successful use of behavior modification. New York: Pergamon Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  14. O'Leary, K. D., O'Leary, S., & Becker, W. C. Modification of a deviant sibling interaction pattern in the home.Behavioral Research and Therapy, 1967,5, 113–120.Google Scholar
  15. O'Leary, K. D., Pelham, W. E., Rosenbaum, A., & Price, G. H. Behavioral treatment of hyperkinetic children: An experimental evaluation of its usefulness.Clinical Pediatrics, 1976,15, 274–279.Google Scholar
  16. Patterson, G. R. An application of conditioning techniques to the control of hyperactive children. In L. Ullmann & L. Krasner, (Eds.),Case studies in behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1965. Pp. 370–375.Google Scholar
  17. Patterson, G. R., Jones, R., Whittier, J., & Wright, M. A. A behavior modification technique for the hyperactive child.Behavioral Research and Therapy, 1965,2, 217–226.Google Scholar
  18. Pihl, R. O. Conditioning procedures with hyperactive children.Neurology, 1967,17, 921–923.Google Scholar
  19. Quay, H. L., Sprague, R. L., Werry, J. S., & McQueen, M. M. Conditioning visual orientation of conduct problems children in the classroom.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 1967,5, 512–217.Google Scholar
  20. Rosenbaum, A., O'Leary, K. D., & Jacob, R. G. Behavioral intervention with hyperactive children: Group consequences as a supplement to individual contingencies.Behavior Therapy, 1975,6, 315–323.Google Scholar
  21. Safer, D. J., & Allen, R. P. Side effects from long-term use of stimulants in children.International Journal of Mental Health, 1975,4, 105–118.Google Scholar
  22. Salzinger, K., Feldman, R. S., & Portnoy, S. Training parents of brain-injured children in the use of operant conditioning procedures.Behavior Therapy, 1970,1, 4–32.Google Scholar
  23. Schrag, P., & Divoky, D.The myth of the hyperactive child and other means of child control. New York: Pantheon, 1975.Google Scholar
  24. Sprague, R. L., Christensen, D. E., & Werry, J. S. Experimental psychology and stimulant drugs. In C. K. Conners (Ed.),Clinical use of stimulant drugs in children. The Hague: Excerpta Medica, 1974. Pp. 141–163.Google Scholar
  25. Sprague, R. L., & Werry, J. S. Methodology of psychopharmacological studies with the retarded. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.),International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 5). New York: Academic Press, 1971. Pp. 147–219.Google Scholar
  26. Sroufe, L. A., & Stewart, M. A. Treating problem children with stimulant drugs.New England Journal of Medicine, 1973,289, 407–413.Google Scholar
  27. Wahlet, R. G., Winkel, G. H., Peterson, R. F., & Morrison, D. C. Mothers as behavior therapists for their own children.Behavioral Research and Therapy, 1965,3, 113–124.Google Scholar
  28. Werry, J. S., & Sprague, R. L. Hyperactivity. In C. G. Costello (Ed.),Symptoms of psychopathology. New York: Wiley, 1970. Pp. 397–417.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachel Gittelman-Klein
    • 1
    • 2
  • Donald F. Klein
    • 2
  • Howard Abikoff
    • 2
  • Sidney Katz
    • 2
  • Audrey C. Gloisten
    • 2
  • Wendy Kates
    • 2
  1. 1.Queens CollegeCity University of New YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryLong Island Jewish-Hillside Medical CenterGlen Oaks

Personalised recommendations