Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 315–326 | Cite as

Effects of positive and negative feedback on behavior control in hyperactive and normal boys

  • Julien Worland
Article

Abstract

The hypothesis that hyperactive boys have relatively less response to negative feedback than to positive feedback was studied. Sixteen hyperactive boys and 16 controls were compared on two tasks under different feedback conditions. Feedback conditions were no feedback, positive feedback, and negative feedback. Tasks were symbol encoding and correcting spelling words. Hyperactives and controls were compared in amount of time on-task and amount of work correctly completed. Hyperactives were on-task significantly more under conditions of negative feedback than under positive feedback, but negative feedback significantly increased errors on the spelling correction task. Controls were equally responsive to positive, negative, or no feedback. Hyperactives accomplished significantly less than controls on the coding task, but performed as well as controls on the spelling correction task, which was administered to each boy at his own level of spelling ability. The results imply that while consistent negative feedback can reduce off-task behavior for hyperactives, it can also decrease the accuracy of the work they are doing.

Keywords

Positive Feedback Negative Feedback Feedback Condition Behavior Control Spelling Correction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, S.Your overactive child: Normal or not? New York: Medcom, 1973.Google Scholar
  2. Ayllon, T., Layman, D., & Kandel, H. A behavioral-educational alternative to drug control of hyperactive children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1975,8, 137–146.Google Scholar
  3. Ayllon, T., & Roberts, M. Eliminating discipline problems by strengthening academic performance.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1974,7, 71–76.Google Scholar
  4. Battle, E., & Lacey, B. A context for hyperactivity over time.Child Development, 1972,43, 757–773.Google Scholar
  5. Bradley, C. Benzedrine and Dexedrine in the treatment of children's behavior disorders.Pediatrics, 1950,5, 24–36.Google Scholar
  6. Chess, S. Diagnosis and treatment of the hyperactive child.tNew York State Journal of Medicine, 1960,60, 2379–2385.Google Scholar
  7. Clarkson, F., and Hayden, B.A developmental study of perceptual, conceptual, motivational and self-concept differences between and within hyperactive and normal groups of preadolescent boys. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1971.Google Scholar
  8. Conners, C. The syndrome of minimal brain dysfunction: Psychological aspects.Pediatrie Clinics of North America, 1967,14, 749–760.Google Scholar
  9. Conners, C., & Eisenberg, E. The effects of methylphenidate on symptomatology and learning in disturbed children.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1963,120, 458–464.Google Scholar
  10. Cruickshank, W., Bentzen, F., Ratzeburg, R., & Tannhauser, M.A teaching method for brain-injured and hyperactive children. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  11. Doubros, S., & Daniels, G. An experimental approach to the reduction of overactive behavior.Behavior Research and Therapy, 1966,4, 251–258.Google Scholar
  12. Dunn, L.Peabody picture vocabulary test. Circle Pines, Minnesota: American Guidance Service, Inc., 1959.Google Scholar
  13. Edwards, A.Experimental design in psychological research (1st ed.). New York: Rinehart & Co., 1950.Google Scholar
  14. Eisenberg, E. The management of the hyperkinetic child.Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1966,8, 593–598.Google Scholar
  15. Firestone, P., & Douglas, V. The effects of reward and punishment on reaction times and autonomic activity in hyperactive and normal children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1975,3, 201–216.Google Scholar
  16. Freibergs, V., & Douglas, V. Concept learning in hyperactive and normal children.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1969,74, 388–395.Google Scholar
  17. Jastak, J., Bijou, S., & Jastak, S.Wide range achievement test. Wilmington, Delaware: Guidance Associates, 1965.Google Scholar
  18. Koppitz, E.The Bender-Gestalt test for young children. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1964.Google Scholar
  19. Kottmeyer, W., & Claus. A.Basic goals in spelling (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1968.Google Scholar
  20. Martin, G., & Powers, R. Attention span: An operant conditioning analysis.Exceptional Children, 1967,33, 565–570.Google Scholar
  21. Patterson, G. An application of conditioning techniques to the control of a hyperactive child. In E. Ullman & E. Krasner,Case studies in behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1965.Google Scholar
  22. Patterson, G., & Gullion, M.Living with children: New methods for parents and teachers (Rev. ed.). Champaign, Illinois: Research Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  23. Patterson, G., Jones, R., Whittier, J., & Wright, M. A behavior modification technique for the hyperactive child.Behavior Research and Therapy, 1965,2, 211–226.Google Scholar
  24. Pihl, R. Conditioning procedure with hyperactive children.Neurology, 1967,17, 421–423.Google Scholar
  25. Wechsler, D.Wechsler intelligence scale for children. New York: Psychological Corporation. 1949.Google Scholar
  26. Wender, P.Minimal brain dysfunction in children. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1971.Google Scholar
  27. Werry, J., & Sprague, R. Hyperactivity. In C. Costello (Ed.),Symptoms of psychopathology. New Yoik: Wiley & Sons, 1970.Google Scholar
  28. Worland, J., North-Jones, M., & Stern, J. Performance and activity of hyperactive and normal boys as a function of distraction and reward.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1973,1, 363–377.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julien Worland
    • 1
  1. 1.Washington University School of MedicineUSA

Personalised recommendations