Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of space location on neglect depends on the nature of the task

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been often reported that in patients with visual neglect line bisection is more accurate in the right than in the left hemispace. However, no data are available on the effect of hemispace on reading errors associated with neglect. We examined a 62-year-old man who presented with severe left neglect following a large infarction in the right cerebral hemisphere. The patient was asked to read 180 words aloud and to bisect 90 lines. Stimuli were presented in three different spatial locations: across the centre, to the right or to the left of the body midline. Line bisection was significantly more accurate in the right hemispace compared with the centre, or the left hemispace. In contrast, reading was significantly more accurate with words presented on the left side than on the centre or right side. This is the first time that such dissociation has been reported. We hypothesize that the dissociation depends on the nature of the stimuli and on the different cognitive demands of the tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bisiach E, Bulgarelli C, Sterzi R, Vallar G (1983) Line bisection and cognitive plasticity of unilateral neglect of space. Brain Cogn 2:32–38

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bottini G, Sterzi R, Vallar G (1992) Directional hypokinesia in spatial hemineglect; a case study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55:562–565

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caramazza A, Hillis AE (1990) Levels of representation, coordinate frames and unilateral neglect. Cogn Neuropsychol 7:391–445

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chain F, Leblanc M, Chedru F, Lhermitte F (1979) Negligence visuelle dans les lésions posterieures de l'hémi-sphere gauche. Rev Neurol (Paris) 135:105–126

    Google Scholar 

  5. Costello A de L, Warrington EK (1987) The dissociation of visuospatial neglect and neglect dyslexia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50:1110–1116

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cubelli R, Nichelli P, Bonito V, De Tanti A, Inzaghi MG (1991) Different patterns of dissociation in unilateral spatial neglect. Brain Cogn 15:139–159

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ellis AW, Flude BM, Young AW (1987) “Neglect dyslexia” and the early visual processing of words and nonwords. Cogn Neuropsychol 4:439–464

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gauthier L, Dehaut F, Joanette Y (1992) The Bells Test: a quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. Int J Clin Neuropsychol 11:49–54

    Google Scholar 

  9. Halligan PW, Marshall JC (1992) Left visuo-spatial neglect: a meaningless entity? Cortex 28:525–535

    Google Scholar 

  10. Halligan PW, Marshall JC, Wade DT (1992) Left on the right: allochiria in a case of left visuo-spatial neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55:717–719

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heilman KM, Valenstein E (1979) Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Ann Neurol 5:166–170

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heilman KM, Bowers D, Watson RT (1983) Performance on hemispatial pointing task by patients with neglect syndrome. Neurology 33:661–664

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heilman KM, Bowers D, Coslett HB, Whelam H, Watson RT (1985) Directional hypokinesia: prolonged reaction times for leftward movements in patients with right hemisphere lesions and neglect. Neurology 35:855–859

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kartsounis LD, Warrington EK (1989) Unilateral neglect overcome by cues implicit in stimulus arrays. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 52:1253–1259

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leicester J, Sidman M, Stoddard LT, Mohr JP (1969) Some determinants of visual neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 32:580–587

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nichelli P, Rinaldi M, Cubelli R (1989) Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Brain Cogn 9:57–70

    Google Scholar 

  17. Riddoch MJ (1991) Neglect and the peripheral dyslexias. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  18. Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW (1983) The effect of cueing in unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 21:589–599

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sartori G (1984) La lettura. Il Mulino, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  20. Spinnler H, Tognoni G (1987) Standardizzazione e taratura di test neuropsicologici. Ital J Neurol Sci 6 [Suppl 8]:1–120

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tegner R, Levander M (1991) Through a looking glass. A new technique to demonstrate directional hypokinesia in unilateral neglect. Brain 114:1943–1951

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weintraub S, Mesulam MM (1988) Visual hemispatial inattention: stimulus parameters and exploratory strategies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 51:1481–1488

    Google Scholar 

  23. Young AW, Newcombe F, Ellis AW (1991) Different impairments contribute to neglect dyslexia. Cogn Neuropsychol 8:177–191

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cubelli, R., Pugliese, M. & Gabellini, A.S. The effect of space location on neglect depends on the nature of the task. J Neurol 241, 611–614 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00920625

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00920625

Key words

Navigation