Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of outcome in multiple sclerosis based on multivariate models

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An incidence cohort of 308 multiple sclerosis patients was followed up repeatedly during at least 25 years of disease. In the patients with acute onset, multivariate survival analyses were performed and predictive models created. The endpoints DSS 6 and start of progressive disease were used. A number of variables were tested. The most important of these for prediction and therefore included in these models were: age at onset, sex, degree of remission after relapse, mono- or polyregional symptoms, type of affected nerve fibres, number of affected neurological systems. The relapse rate did not correlate with prognosis. In the predictive models, coefficients and risk ratios are provided that can be used for calculating the risk of progression and DSS 6 or to predict the median time for these endpoints in individual patients. It was also found that the risk of progression is not constant, but has a maximum a certain time after disease onset. For a patient with early onset, the risk is low in the beginning, but reaches a maximum level, which is several times higher, after about 15 years. The patient with a late onset has a much higher risk of endpoint immediately after onset, but reaches the maximum in a few years, and after that the risk decreases

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aitkin M, Anderson D, Francis B, Hinde J (1990) Statistical modeling in GLIM. Oxford statistical science series. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen O (1980) Restricted dissemination of clinically defined attacks in an MS incidence matieral. Acta Neurol Scand 62 [Suppl 77], pp 1–70

    Google Scholar 

  3. Breslow NE, Day NE (1987) Statistical methods in cancer research. In: IARC Scientific Publications No 32. Lyon, pp 131–135

  4. Broman T, Andersen O, Bergmann L (1981) Clinical studies on MS. Acta Neurol Scand 63:6–33

    Google Scholar 

  5. Confavreux C, Aimard G, Devic M (1980) Course and prognosis of multiple sclerosis assessed by the computerized data processing of 349 patients. Brain 103:281–300

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cox DR, Oakes D (1988) Analysis of survival data. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koch-Henriksen N (1989) An epidemiological study of multiple sclerosis. Familial aggregation, social determinants and exogenic factors. Acta Neurol Scand 80 [Suppl 124], pp 1–43

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lycke J (1993) Studies on the possible involvement of human herpes- and retroviruses in multiple sclerosis. Thesis, University of Göteborg

  9. Poser C, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, McDonald WI, Davis FA, Ebers GC, Johnson KP, Sibley WA, Silberberg DH, Tourtellotte WW (1983) New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 13:227–231

    Google Scholar 

  10. Riise T, Grønning M, Fernández O, Lauer K, Midgard R, Minderhoud JM, Nyland H, Pálffy G, Poser S, Aarli J (1992) Early prognostic factors for disability in multiple sclerosis, a European multicenter study. Acta Neurol Scand 85:212–218

    Google Scholar 

  11. Runmarker B, Andersen O (1993) Prognostic factors in a multiple sclerosis incidence cohort with 25 years of follow-up. Brain 116:117–134

    Google Scholar 

  12. Svenningsson A, Runmarker B, Lycke J, Andersen O (1990) Incidence of MS during two fifteen-year periods in the Gothenburg region of Sweden. Acta Neurol Scand 82:161–168

    Google Scholar 

  13. The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group (1993) Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Neurology 43:655–661

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weinshenker BG, Ebers GC (1987) The natural history of multiple sclerosis. Can J Neurol Sci 14:255–261

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weinshenker BG, Bass B, Rice GPA, Noseworthy J, Carriere W, Baskerville J, Ebers GC (1989) The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 2. Predictive value of early clinical course. Brain 112:1419–1428

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weinshenker BG, Rice GPA, Noseworthy JH, Carriere W, Baskerville J, Ebers GC (1991) The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 3. Multivariate analysis of predictive factors and models of outcome. Brain 114:1045–1056

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Runmarker, B., Andersson, C., Odén, A. et al. Prediction of outcome in multiple sclerosis based on multivariate models. J Neurol 241, 597–604 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00920623

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00920623

Key words

Navigation