Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 75–89 | Cite as

Attributional style in aggressive adolescent boys

  • Mark R. Fondacaro
  • Kenneth Heller
Article

Abstract

Past research suggests that aggressive children misattribute hostile intentions to peers during ambiguous provocative interactions. This study sought to extend the analysis of attributional differences between aggressive and nonaggressive boys to a sample of court-involved adolescents and their perceptions of interactions involving both peers and adults. Three groups of youngsters (nonoffenders, nonaggressive offenders, and aggressive offenders) participated in a structured interview and provided causal attributions for interpersonal problems commonly faced by teenagers. Results indicated that offenders were more likely than nonoffenders to attribute blame to others in ambiguous problem situations. Among offenders, external, person-centered blame attributions were.significantly related to aggressiveness. This relationship was found only in ambiguous situations, and the correlation between such person-centered attributions and aggressiveness was higher in adultoriented interactions than in peer-oriented ones. Overall, the results suggest that aggressiveness among offenders is associated with an attributional style that is characterized by the tendency to attribute blame for problems in ambiguous interactions to global, dispositional characteristics of others.

Keywords

Past Research Structure Interview Problem Situation Causal Attribution Attributional Style 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandura, A.Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Berkowitz, L. (1977). Situational and personal conditions governing reactions to aggressive cues. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.),Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 165–171). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Dodge, K. A. (1980). Social cognition and children's aggressive behavior.Child Development, 51, 162–170.Google Scholar
  4. Dodge, K. A., & Frame, C. L. (1982). Social cognitive biases and deficits in aggressive boys.Child Development, 53, 620–635.Google Scholar
  5. Dodge, K. A., & Murphy, R. R. (1983). The assessment of social competence in adolescents. In P. Karoly & J. Steffen (Eds.),Adolescent behavior disorders. Vol. IV ofAdvances in child behavioral analysis and therapy (pp. 61–96). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  6. Dodge, K. A., & Newman, J. P. (1981). Biased decision making processes in aggressive boys.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 375–379.Google Scholar
  7. Dodge, K. A., & Tomlin, A. (1983).The role of cue-utilization in attributional biases among aggressive children. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  8. Freedman, B. J., Rosenthal, L., Donahoe, C. P., Jr., Schlundt, D. G., & McFall, R. M. (1978). A social-behavioral analysis of skill deficits in delinquent and non-delinquent adolescent boys.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 1448–1462.Google Scholar
  9. Goldfried, M. R., & D'Zurilla, T. J. (1969). A behavioral-analytic model for assessing competence. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.),Current topics in clinical and community psychyology (Vol. 1, pp. 151–196). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hays, W. L. (1973).Statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  11. Hollingshead, A. B. (1975).Four factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University.Google Scholar
  12. McFall, R. M. (1982). A review and reformulation of the concepts of social skills.Behavioral Assessment, 4, 1–35.Google Scholar
  13. McFall, R. M., & Dodge, K. A. (1982). Self-management and interpersonal skills learning. In P. Karoly & F.H. Kanfer (Eds.),Self-management and behavior change: From theory to practice (pp. 353–392). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  14. Nasby, W., Hayden, B., & DePaulo, B. M. (1980). Attributional bias among aggressive boys to interpret unambiguous social stimuli as displays of hostility.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89, 459–468.Google Scholar
  15. Novaco, R. W. (1978). Anger and coping with stress:Cognitive-behavioral therapy: Research and application (pp. 135–173). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  16. Quay, H. C., & Peterson, D. R. (1979).Manual for the Behavior Problem Checklist. Unpublished.Google Scholar
  17. Russell, D. (1982). The causal dimension scale: A measure of how individuals perceive causes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1137–1145.Google Scholar
  18. Weiner, B., Graham, S., & Chandler, C. (1982). Pity, anger, and guilt: An attributional analysis.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 226–232.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark R. Fondacaro
    • 1
  • Kenneth Heller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyIndiana UniversityBloomington

Personalised recommendations