Abstract
Activity level of 13 boys (aged 9–13) from a day hospital program was measured using actometers in classroom, gym, woodshop, and group therapy settings. Ratings of Ss' activity were obtained from mothers using the Werry scale, and from six clinical staff familiar with the Ss using the Davids scale. It was predicted that activity ratings would have situationally specific relationships with actometermeasured activity level according to the rater's opportunities for observation. Comparisons between measures indicated that all clinical staff ratings correlated significantly with actometer activity in the classroom (r=.49 to r=.73), while mothers' ratings correlated significantly with actometer activity in gym (r=.67), and woodshop (r=.77), and with overall activity (r=.65), a combined measure derived from actometer scores in the four conditions tested. Five of six clinical staff raters showed significant interrater reliability (r=.58 to r=.83). Results are discussed in terms of their implications for solution of current problems in assessment of activity level and hyperactivity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference notes
Douglas, V., Weiss, G., & Minde, K. Learning disabilities in the hyperactive child and the effect of methylphenidate. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Toronto, 1969.
Schulman, J. L., Suran, B. G., Kupst, M. J., & Stevens, T. M. Activity level: A review of theories and an experimental study. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1976.
References
Bell, R. Q. Adaptation of small wrist watches for mechanical recording of activity in infants and children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1968,6, 302–305.
Conners, C. K. Symptom patterns in hyperkinetic, neurotic, and normal children.Child Development, 1970,41, 667–682.
Cromwell, R. L., Baumeister, A., & Hawkins, W. F. Research in activity level. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.),Handbook of mental deficiency. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963. Pp. 632–663.
Davids, A. An objective instrument for assessing hyperkinesis in children.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1971,4, 499–501.
Denhoff, E., Davids, A., & Hawkins, R. Effects of dextroamphetamine on hyperkinetic children: A controlled double blind study.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1971,4, 491–498.
Greenberg, L. M., Deem, M. A., & McMahon, S. Effects of dextroamphetamine, chlorpromazine and hydroxyzine on behavior and performance in hyperactive children.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1972,129, 532–539.
Halverson, C. D., & Waldrop, M. F. The relations of mechanically recorded activity level to varieties of preschool play behavior.Child Development, 1973,44, 678–681.
Kenny, T. J., Clemmens, R. L., Hudson, B. W., Lentz, C. A., Cicci, R., & Nair, P. Characteristics of children referred because of hyperactivity,Journal of Pediatrics, 1971,79, 618–622.
Massey, P. S., Lieberman, A., & Batarseh, G. Measure of activity level in mentally retarded children and adolescents.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1971,76, 259–261.
McConnell, T. R., Cromwell, R. L., Bialer, I., & Son, C. D. Studies in activity level: VII. Effects of amphetamine drug administration on the activity level of retarded children.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1964,68, 647–651.
Pope, L. Motor activity in brain-injured children.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1970,40, 783–794.
Quinn, P. O., & Rapoport, J. L. One year follow-up of hyperactive boys treated with imipramine or methylphenidate.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1975,132, 241–245.
Rapoport, J., Abramson, A., Alexander, D., & Lott, I. Playroom observations of hyperactive children on medication.Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 1971,10, 524–534.
Routh, D. K., Schroeder, C. S., & O' Tuama, L. A. Development of activity level in children.Developmental Psychology, 1974,10, 163–168.
Schleifer, M., Weiss, G., Cohen, N., Elman, J., Cvejic, H., & Kruger, E. Hyperactivity in preschoolers and the effect of methylphenidate.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1975,45, 38–50.
Schrager, J., Lindy, J., Harrison, S., McDermott, J., & Killins, E. The hyperkinetic child: Some consensually validated behavioral correlates.Exceptional Children, 1966,32, 635–637.
Schulman, J. L., Kaspar, J. C., & Throne, F. M.Brain damage and behavior: A clinical experimental study. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C Thomas, 1965.
Schulman, J. L., & Reisman, J. M. An objective measure of hyperactivity.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1959,64, 455–456.
Schulman, J. L., Suran, B. G., & Stevens, T. M.The biomotometer: A new device for the measurement and remediation of hyperactivity.Child Development, 1977,48, 1152–1154.
Sprague, R. L., & Sleator, E. K. Effects of psychopharmacologic agents on learning disorders.Pediatric Clinics of North America, 1973,20, 719–735.
Tizard, B. Observations of overactive imbecile children in controlled and uncontrolled environments. I. Classroom studies.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1968,72, 540–547. (a)
Tizard, B. Observations of overactive imbecile children in controlled and uncontrolled environments. II. Experimental studies.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1968,72, 548–553. (b)
Werry, J. S. Developmental hyperactivity.Pediatric Clinics of North America, 1968,15, 581–599.
Werry, J. S., & Sprague, R. L. Hyperactivity. In C. G. Costello (Ed.),Symptoms of psychopathology. New York: Wiley, 1970. Pp. 397–417.
Zrull, J. P., Westman, J. C., Arthur, B., & Rice, D. L. An evaluation of methodology used in the study of psychoactive drugs for children.Journal of the American Academy of Children Psychiatry, 1966,5, 284–291.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was supported by Research Grant 000-9615-1204 from Children's Memorial Hospital and by a grant from the Margaret Etter Creche Learning Center. The authors would like to thank the clinical staff of the Division of Child Psychiatry, Children's Memorial Hospital, Day Hospital Program, for their assistance in data collection, and Ms. Jean Stiman for her help in reviewing and typing the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stevens, T.M., Kupst, M.J., Suran, B.G. et al. Activity level: A comparison between actometer scores and observer ratings. J Abnorm Child Psychol 6, 163–173 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00919122
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00919122