Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 237–243 | Cite as

A regression analysis of test bias on the WISC-R for Anglos and Chicanos referred for psychological services

  • Cecil R. Reynolds
  • Terry B. Gutkin
Article

Abstract

Predictive validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised was investigated across race for 174 Chicano and 94 Anglo children referred for psychological services. Regression lines for the prediction of achievement were compared across race through the Potthoff analysis, which provides a simultaneous test of slope and intercept values. Results of these comparisons generally supported the predictive validity of the WISC-R across race with this referral sample of young children.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anastasi, A.Psychological testing (4 th ed.) New York: Macmillan, 1976.Google Scholar
  2. Bartlett, C. J., & O'Leary, B. S. A differential prediction model to moderate the effect of heterogeneous groups in personnel selection and classification.Personnel Psychology, 1969,22, 1–18.Google Scholar
  3. Cardall, C., & Coffman, W. A method for comparing the performance of different groups on the items in a test.Research and Development Reports, 1964, 64–65(9), College Entrance Examination Board.Google Scholar
  4. Cleary, T. A. Test bias: Prediction of grades of Negro and white students in integrated colleges.Journal of Educational Measurement, 1968,5, 115–124.Google Scholar
  5. Cleary, T. A., Humphreys, L. G., Kendrick, S. A., & Wesman, A. Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students.American Psychologist, 1975,30, 15–41.Google Scholar
  6. Cronbach, L. J.Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.Google Scholar
  7. Einhorn, J. J., & Bass, A. R. Methodological considerations relevant to discrimination in employment testing.Psychological Bulletin, 1971,75, 261–269.Google Scholar
  8. Flaugher, R. L. The many definitions of test bias.American Psychologist, 1978,33, 671–679.Google Scholar
  9. Gutkin, T. B., & Reynolds, C. R. Factorial similarity of the WISC-R for blacks and whites in the standardization sample.Journal of Educational Psychology, in press, (a)Google Scholar
  10. Gutkin, T. B., & Reynolds, C. R. Factorial similarity of the WISC-R for Anglos and Chicanos referred for psychological services.Journal of School Psychology, in press. (b)Google Scholar
  11. Humphreys, L. G. Statistical definitions of test validity for minority groups.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973,58, 14.Google Scholar
  12. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. Critical analysis of the statistical and ethical implications of various definitions of test bias.Psychological Bulletin, 1976,83, 1053–1071.Google Scholar
  13. Kallingal, A. The prediction of grades for black and white students at Michigan State University.Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971,8, 263–265.Google Scholar
  14. Kirkpatrick, J. J.The psychological testing establishment: Vested interests versus responsibility. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Miami Beach, September 1970.Google Scholar
  15. Lambert, N.What of tomorrow's children: Tests on Trial II. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, San Diego, March 1979.Google Scholar
  16. Mercer, J. R.Labelling the mentally retarded. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  17. Oakland, T., & Matuszek, P. Using tests in non-discriminatory assessment. In T. Oakland (Ed.),Psychological and educational assessment of minority group children. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1977.Google Scholar
  18. Potthoff, R. F.Statistical aspects of the problem of biases in psychological tests. Institute of Statistics Mimeo Series No. 479, Chapel Hill, North Carolina: Department of Statistics, 1966.Google Scholar
  19. Reschly, D. J. WISC-R factor structures among Anglos, Blacks, Chicanos, and native American Papagos.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978,46, 417–422.Google Scholar
  20. Reschly, D. J., & Sabers, D. Analysis of test bias in four groups with the regression definition.Journal of Educational Measurement, 1979,16, 1–9.Google Scholar
  21. Reynolds, C. R., & Gutkin, T. B. Stability of the WISC-R factor structure across sex at two age levels.Journal of Clinical Psychology, in press.Google Scholar
  22. Reynolds, C. R., Gutkin, T. B., Dappen, L., & Wright, D. Differential validity of the WISC-R for boys and girls referred for psychological services.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1979,48, 868–870.Google Scholar
  23. Reynolds, C. R., & Hartlage, L. C. Comparison of WISC and WISC-R regression lines for academic prediction with black and white referred children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979,47, 589–591.Google Scholar
  24. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. Racial and ethnic bias in psychological tests: Divergent implications of two definitions of test bias.American Psychologist, 1974,29, 1–8.Google Scholar
  25. Thorndike, R. L. Concepts of culture-fairness.Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971,8, 63–70.Google Scholar
  26. Vance, H. B., & Wallbrown, F. H. The factor structure of intelligence for black children: A hierarchial approach.Psychological Record, 1978,28, 31–39.Google Scholar
  27. Wechsler, D. W.Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation, 1974.Google Scholar
  28. Williams, R. L. Danger: Testing and dehumanizing black children.Clinical Child Psychology Newsletter, 1970,9, 5–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cecil R. Reynolds
    • 1
  • Terry B. Gutkin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational Psychology and MeasurementUniversity of NebraskaLincoln

Personalised recommendations