Skip to main content
Log in

Retinal nerve fiber layer defects and automated perimetry evaluation in ocular hypertensives

  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Preliminary results of a larger investigation on correlation between Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defects (RNFL) and Automated Perimetry (AP) are presented. A group of ocular hypertensive patients was recruited and a cross-section, randomized study was carried out. The group was composed of 54 eyes from 28 patients; 15 men and 13 women, mean age 42.76 year, mean visual acuity 0.95 (Snellen cart) and mean visual defect expressed in diopters was+0.514 (from − 2.5 to+5). A total of 17 (31.48%) refractive fields were pathologic according to our criteria, one from a normal RNFL and the others from nerve fiber defects. We observed 6 no reliable RNFL photographs, 18 normal, 11 slits, 6 wedge, 11 diffuse and 2 mixed defects. Comparing RNFL and AP, 53.33% of eyes with fiber defects had abnormal perimetries. The more evolutioned the defect, the larger percentage of abnormal visual fields were observed: 36.36% in slit defects, 66.66% in wedge, 54.55% in diffuse and 100% in mixed ones. Comparing location of defects with location of cluster of decreased sensibility points in visual field, a higher correlation in inferior than superior defects was found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Airaksinen PJ, Drance SM, Douglas GR, Mawson D, Nieminen H. Diffuse and localized nerve fiber loss in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1984; 98: 566–571.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Calonge B, Honrubia F. La fotografía de la Capa de Fibras Nerviosas de la Retina en el Diagnóstico Precoz del Glaucoma. Glaucoma 1987; 1(4): 99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caprioli J. Automated perimetry in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 111(2): 235–239.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drake MV. Glaucomatous visual loss: field color and contrast. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1990; 30(3): 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjects. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heijl A, Lindgren GL, Olsson J, Åsman P. Visual field interpretation with empiric probability maps. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 204–208.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Honrubia F, Calonge B, Abecia E, Gómez M. Correlación entre los defectos en la capa de fibras nerviosas de la retina y el glaucoma. Arch Soc Esp Oftal (in press).

  8. Hoyt WT, Schlicke B, Eckelhoff RF. Funduscopic appearance of a nerve fiber layer bundle defect. Br J Ophthalmol 1972; 56: 577–583.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Katz J, Sommer A. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss. The effect of patient reliability. Ophthalmology 1989; 97(8): 1032–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Katz J. Sommer A., Witt K. Reliability of visual field results over repeated testing. Ophthalmology 1990; 98(1): 70–75.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson-Quigg JM, Twelker JD, Johson CA. Response properties of normal observers and patients during automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 1612–1615.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Quigley HA. Examination of the retinal nerve fiber layer in the recognition of early glaucoma damage. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1986; 84: 920–966.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1982; 100: 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Quigley HA, Sommer A. How to use nerve fiber layer examination in the management of glaucoma. Tran Am Ophthalmol Soc 1987; 85: 245–272.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sommer A, D'Anna SA, Kues HA, George T. High-resolution photography of the retinal nerve fiber layer. Am J Ophthalmol 1983; 96(4): 535–539.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sommer A, Enger C, Witt K. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with automated threshold perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 1987; 103: 681–684.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Clinically detectable nerve fiber layer atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109: 77–83.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sommer A, Miller NR, Pollack I, Maumenee AE, George T. The nerve fiber layer in diagnosis of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1972; 95: 2149–2156.

    Google Scholar 

  19. STACPAC User's guide. San Leandro, California, Allergan Humphrey, 1986.

  20. The Humphrey field analyzer owner's manual. San Leandro, California, Allergan Humphrey, 1986.

  21. Tuulonen A, Airaksinen PJ. Initial glaucomatous optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer abnormalities and their progression. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 111: 485–490.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Werner EB, Krupin T, Adelson A, Feitl ME. Effect of patient experience on the results of automated perimetry in glaucoma suspect patients. Ophthalmology 1990; 97(1): 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zalta AH. Lens rim artifact in automated threshold perimetry. Ophthalmol 1989; 96(9): 1302–1311.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abecia, E., Honrubia, F.M. Retinal nerve fiber layer defects and automated perimetry evaluation in ocular hypertensives. Int Ophthalmol 16, 239–242 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917968

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917968

Key words

Navigation