Skip to main content
Log in

Child- versus teacher-administered token programs in a psychiatric hospital school

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to: (a) compare student-administered token programs with similar programs administered by professional teachers, (b) investigate the contribution of feedback to the success of token systems, (c) compare the effectiveness of peer and teacher feedback, and (d) test a sequence of withdrawal from token programs designed to increase generalization. Results indicated that (a) peers could do just as well as teachers in reducing disruptive behavior through a token program, (b) feedback is not solely responsible for the effectiveness of token reinforcement, (c) peer feedback may be more effective than teacher feedback, and (d) withdrawal from token reinforcement to feedback may be a successful method of retarding the increases in disruptive behavior usually found when backup reinforcers are eliminated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod, S., Hall, R. V., & Maxwell, A. Use of peer attention to increase study behavior. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas, 1971.

  • Bushell, D., Wrobel, P. A., & Michaelis, M. L. Applying “group” contingencies to the classroom study behavior of preschool children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1968,1, 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. V., Fox, R., Willard, D., Goldsmith, L., Emerson, M., Owen, M., Davis, F., & Porcia, E. The teacher as observer and experimenter in the modification of disputing and talking-out behaviors.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1971,4, 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haring, N., & Hauck, M. Improved learning conditions in the establishment of reading skills with disabled readers.Exceptional Children, 1969,35, 341–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, K., & O'Leary, K. D. Reward, cost, and selfevaluation procedures for disruptive adolescents in a psychiatric hospital school.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1972,5, 293–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, K. D., & Becker, W. C. Behavior modification of an adjustment class: A token reinforcement program.Exceptional Children, 1967,33, 637–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, K. D., Becker, W., Evans, M., & Saudargas, R. A token reinforcement program in a public school: A replication and systematic analysis.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969,2, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, K. D., & Drabman, R. Token reinforcement programs in the classroom: A review.Psychological Bulletin, 1971,75, 379–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, K. D., Kaufman, K. F., Kass, R. E., & Drabman, R. S. The effects of loud and soft reprimands on the behavior of disruptive students.Exceptional Children, 1970,37, 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R. An application of conditioning techniques to the control of a hyperactive child. In L. P. Ullmann & L. Krasner (Eds.),Case studies in behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, E., Bailey, J., & Wolf, M. Achievement Place: A token economy in a home-style rehabilitation program for juvenile offenders. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, Washington, D.C., 1969.

  • Phillips, E. L., & Wolf, M. M. Modification of behavioral deficiencies in adolescents. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, San Francisco, 1968.

  • Quay, H. C., Sprague, R. L., Werry, J. S., & McQueen, M. M. Conditioning visual orientation of conduct problem children in the classroom.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1967,5, 512–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. P., Brethower, D., & Cabot, R. Increasing task behavior in a language arts program by providing reinforcement.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1969,8, 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surratt, P. R., Ulrich, R. E., & Hawkins, R. P. An elementary student as a behavioral engineer.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969,2, 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasik, B. The application of Premack's generalization on reinforcement to the management of classroom behavior.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1970,10, 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The project was supported by Grant OEG 0-71-2872 (607) from the U.S. Department of Education and Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. The opinions expressed herein, however, do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the U.S. Office of Education, and no official endorsement by that Office should be inferred. The author would like to thank Drs. L. Krasner, A. O. Ross, and K. Feldman for their assistance throughout the study, and Dr. K. D. O'Leary for his invaluable help. Also gratefully acknowledged is the help of R. Spitalnik, R. Kent, M. Hageman. S. Ransom, W. Kaler, S. Golembeski and E. Howard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drabman, R.S. Child- versus teacher-administered token programs in a psychiatric hospital school. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1, 68–87 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917891

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917891

Keywords

Navigation