Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 83–97 | Cite as

The pupil evaluation inventory

A sociometric technique for assessing children's social behavior
  • Eugene G. Pekarik
  • Ronald J. Prinz
  • Diane E. Liebert
  • Sheldon Weintraub
  • John M. Neale
Article

Abstract

The Pupil Evaluation Inventory was developed to assess peer ratings of the behavior of male and female children in grades one through nine. Three homogeneous and stable factors emerged from a factor analysis: Aggression, Withdrawal and Likeability. High interrater agreement between male and female raters, stability of factorial structure, high internal consistency, and moderate concurrent validity were found across sex and grade levels. Test-retest reliability was high for a separate sample of third and sixth graders. There was a tendency for higher internal consistency and teacher-peer correlations for the Aggression factor.

Keywords

Internal Consistency Factorial Structure Grade Level Concurrent Validity High Internal Consistency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bardon, J. I., & Bennett, V. D. Helping children in school. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.),Manual of child psychopathology, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.Google Scholar
  2. Bower, E. M. The school psychologist's role in their identification and adjustment of socioemotionally handicapped children. In J. I. Magary (Ed.),School psychological services in theory and practice: A handbook. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1967.Google Scholar
  3. Bower, E. M.Early identification of emotionally handicapped children in school. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C Thomas, 1969.Google Scholar
  4. Burton, R. V. Validity of retrospective reports assessed by the multitrait-multimethod analyses.Developmental Psychology Monographs, 1970, (3, Pt. 2).Google Scholar
  5. Buss, A. H. Personal communication, 1967, cited in L. D. Eron, L. O. Walder, and M. M. Lefkowitz,Learning of aggression in children. Boston: Little, Brown& Co., 1971.Google Scholar
  6. Eron, L. D., Walder, L. O., & Lefkowitz, M. M.Learning of agression in children. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1971.Google Scholar
  7. Gorsuch, R. L.Factor analysis. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co., 1974.Google Scholar
  8. Havighurst, R. J., DeHaan, R. F., Dietrich, W. J., Hackamack, H., Johnson, L.,& King, R. D. A communinity youth development program.Supplementary Education Monograph, 1952, No. 75.Google Scholar
  9. Himelstein, P., & Lubin, R. Attempted validation of the self-disclosure inventory by the peer nomination technique.Journal of Psychology, 1965,61, 13–16.Google Scholar
  10. Leibowitz, G. Comparison of self-report and behavioral techniques of assessing aggression.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1968,32, 21–25.Google Scholar
  11. Lesser, G. S. The relationships between various forms of aggression and popularity among lower class children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1959,50, 20–25.Google Scholar
  12. Minturn, M., & Lewis, M. Age differences in peer ratings of socially desirable and socially undesirable behavior.Psychology Reports, 1968,23, 783–791.Google Scholar
  13. Mitchell, J. V. The factor analysis of a “guess-who” questionnaire assigned to identify significant patterns in children.Journal of Personality, 1956,24, 376–386.Google Scholar
  14. Neale, J. M., & Weintraub, S. Children vulnerable to psychopathology: The Stony Brook high-risk project.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1975,3, 95–113.Google Scholar
  15. Norman, W. T. Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963,66, 574–583.Google Scholar
  16. Roff, M., & Sells, S. Juvenile delinquency in relation to peer acceptance-rejection and socioeconomic status.Psychology in the Schools, 1968,5, 3–18.Google Scholar
  17. Rolf, J. E. The academic and social competence of school children vulnerable to schizophrenia and other behavior pathologies.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1972,80, 225–243.Google Scholar
  18. Sells, S. B., & Roff, M.Peer acceptance-rejection and personality development. Final report of a five year research program, including studies of the origins of acceptance-rejection, effects on early delinquency and drop-out, and developmental dynamics. U. S. Office of Education, January, 1967.Google Scholar
  19. Siegelman, M. Psychometric properties of the Winder and Wiggins peer nomination inventory.Journal of Psychology, 1966,64, 143–149.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, G. Usefulness of peer ratings of personality in educational research.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1967,24, 967–984.Google Scholar
  21. Walder, L. O., Abelson, R., Eron, L. D., Banta, T. J., & Laulicht, J. H. Development of a peer-rating measure of aggression.Psychological Reports, 1961,9, 497–556 (monograph supplement 4–49).Google Scholar
  22. Wiggins, J. S., & Winder, C. L. The peer nomination inventory: An empirically derived sociometric measure of adjustment in preadolescent boys.Psychological Reports, 1961,9, 643–677.Google Scholar
  23. Winder, C. L., & Wiggins, J. S. Social reputation and behavior: A further validation of the Peer Nomination Inventory.Journal of Social Psychology, 1964,68, 681–684.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugene G. Pekarik
    • 1
  • Ronald J. Prinz
    • 1
  • Diane E. Liebert
    • 1
  • Sheldon Weintraub
    • 1
  • John M. Neale
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyState University of New YorkNew York

Personalised recommendations