Abstract
In order to determine the interpersonal distancing requirements for emotionally disturbed and normal children and in order to investigate the relationship of locus of control and anxiety to interpersonal space, 20 emotionally disturbed and 20 normal boys were randomly required to approach an object person and to let the object person approach them until they felt uncomfortable. Results indicated that emotionally disturbed boys required more space than normals; that subjects would approach closer than they would allow the object person to approach them; and that externals required more space than internals. There were no significant differences between high and low anxious subjects, nor between emotionally disturbed children diagnostically classified as overanxious reaction and those with other diagnosis. Finally, neither anxiety nor locus of control explained the significant normal—emotionally disturbed differences in space requirements. Theoretical and practical implications were discussed as well as the relationship between the present and previous research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey, K. G., Harnett, J. J., & Gibson, F. W., Jr. Implied threat and the territorial factor in personal space.Psychological Reports, 1972,30, 263–270.
Burckhardt, D. Mowenbeobachtungen in Basel.Ornithologische Beobachter, 1944,5, 49–76.
Duke, M. P., & Mullens, M. C. Preferred interpersonal distance as a function of locus of control orientation in schizophrenics, nonschizophrenic patients, and normals.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973,41, 230–234.
Duke, M. P., & Nowicki, S., Jr. A new measure and social learning model for interpersonal distance.Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1972,6, 1–16.
Fisher, R. L. Social schema of normal and disturbed school children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1967,58, 88–92.
Haase, R. F., & Markley, M. S. A methodological note on the study of personal space.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973,40, 122–125.
Hall, E. T. A system for the notation of proxemic behavior.American Anthropologist, 1963,65, 1003–1026.
Hall, E. T.The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday, 1966.
Hartnett, J. J., Bailey, K. G., & Gibson, F. W., Jr. Personal space as influenced by sex and type of movement.Journal of Psychology, 1970,76, 139–144.
Hediger, H.Wild animals in captivity. London: Butterworths Scientific Publications, 1950.
Horowitz, M. J., Duff, D., & Stratton, L. The body buffer zone: An exploration of personal space.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1964,11, 651–656.
Keuthe, J. L. Social schemas.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962,64, 31–38.
Mallenby, T. W. Personal space: Projective and direct measures with institutionalized mentally retarded children.Journal of Personality Assessment, 1974,38, 28–31.
McBride, G., King, M. G., & James, S. W. Social proxemity effects of galvanic skin responses in adult humans.Journal of Psychology, 1965,61, 153–157.
Mehrabian, A. Significance of posture and position in the communication of attitude and status relationships.Psychological Bulletin, 1969,71, 359–372.
Newman, R. C., & Pollack, D. Proxemics in deviant adolescents.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973,40, 6–8.
Nowicki, S., Jr., & Strickland, B. R. A locus of control scale for children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973,40, 148–154.
Sommer, R. Small group ecology.Psychological Bulletin, 1967,67, 145–152.
Sommer, R.Personal space. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1969.
Spielberger, C. D. Anxiety as an emotional state. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.),Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Spielberger, C. D.Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory of Children. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1973.
Tolor, A. Psychological distance in disturbed and normal children.Psychological Reports, 1968,25, 659–701.
Tolor, A., Brannigan, G. G., & Murphey, V. M. Psychological distance, future time perspective, and internal-external expectancy.Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality, 1970,34, 283–294.
Weinstein, L. Social schemata of emotional disturbed boys.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1965,70, 457–461.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kendall, P.C., Deardorff, P.A., Finch, A.J. et al. Proxemics, locus of control, anxiety, and type of movement in emotionally disturbed and normal boys. J Abnorm Child Psychol 4, 9–16 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917601
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917601