Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 353–374 | Cite as

Normal versus deviant children

A multimethod comparison
  • Gretchen K. Lobitz
  • Stephen M. Johnson
Article

Abstract

The present study investigated differences between referred and nonreferred children and their families on the basis of home and clinic observations and parent questionnaires. Subjects were 28 families with children between 4 and 8 years of age who had been referred to a clinic for actingout behavior and 28 nonreferred controls matched on several variables. Home observation results indicated that referred children showed significantly more deviant behavior and less prosocial behavior than nonreferred children and that their parents emitted more negative and commanding behavior in contrast to the control group. Systematic observation in the clinic revealed significant differences only in parent negativeness and number of commands. Finally, all five factors of the parent attitude questionnaire yielded large and significant differences between groups. There was considerable overlap between groups on all behavior variables but less overlap on the parent attitude measure. Results from a stepwise discriminant analysis classified 90% of referred children and 90% of nonreferred children correctly on the basis of the parent attitude variable alone. Taken together, these results suggest that child behavior is not always the critical variable in referral and stress the importance of multiple assessment procedures for child-family problems when children are referred for treatment.

Keywords

Discriminant Analysis Child Behavior Prosocial Behavior Parent Attitude Assessment Procedure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference notes

  1. 1.
    Brandon, S.An epidemiological study of maladjustment in childhood. M.D. thesis, University of Durham, 1960.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shaw, D. A.Family maintenance schedules for deviant behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson, D.Application of a behavior modification technique to the control of the hyperactive child. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Oregon, 1964.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ebner, M.An investigation of the role of the social environment in the generalization and persistence of the effect of a behavior modification program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1967.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adkins, D. A., & Johnson, S. M.What behaviors may be called deviant for children?A comparison of two approaches to behavior classification. Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Portland, April 1972.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Skindrud, K.An evaluation of observer bias in experimental-field studies of social interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1972.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karpowitz, D.Stimulus control in family interaction sequences as observed in the naturalistic setting of the home. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1972.Google Scholar

References

  1. 8.
    Beakel, N. G., & Mehrabian, A. Inconsistent communications and psychopathology.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1969,74, 126–130.Google Scholar
  2. 9.
    Becker, W. C. The relationship of parental ratings of self and each other to the behavior of kindergarten children as rated by mothers, fathers, and teachers.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1960,24, 507–527.Google Scholar
  3. 10.
    Block, J. Parents of schizophrenic, neurotic, asthmatic, and congenitally ill children.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1969,20, 659–674.Google Scholar
  4. 11.
    Bugental, D. E., Love, L. R., & Kaswan, J. W. Videotaped family interaction: Differences reflecting presence and type of child disturbance.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1972,79, 285–290.Google Scholar
  5. 12.
    Bugental, D. E., Love, L. R., Kaswan, J. W., & April, C. Verbal-nonverbal conflict in parental messages to normal and disturbed children.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1971,77, 6–10.Google Scholar
  6. 13.
    Conners, C. K. Symptom patterns in hyperkinetic, neurotic, and normal children.Child Development, 1970,41, 667–682.Google Scholar
  7. 14.
    Delfini, L. F., Bernai, M. C., & Rosen, P. M. Comparison of normal and deviant boys in their homes. In L. A. Hamerlynck, L. D. Handy, & E. J. Mash (Eds.),Behavior modification and families. 1. Theory and research. 2. Applications and developments. New York: Brunner Mazel, 1976, in press.Google Scholar
  8. 15.
    Eberhardy, F. The view from the couch.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1967,8, 257–263.Google Scholar
  9. 16.
    Eyberg, S. M., & Johnson, S. M. Multiple assessment of behavior modification with families: Effects of contingency contracting and order of treated problems.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974,42, (4), 594–606.Google Scholar
  10. 17.
    Haley, J. Marriage therapy.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1963,8, 213–234.Google Scholar
  11. 18.
    Herbert, E. W., & Baer, D. M. Training parents as behavior modifiers: Self-recording of contingent attention.Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 1972,5, 139–149.Google Scholar
  12. 19.
    Jenkins, R. L. The varieties of children's behavior problems and family dynamics.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1968,124, 1440–1445.Google Scholar
  13. 20.
    Johnson, S. M., & Lobitz, G. K. Parental manipulation of child behavior in home observations.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1974,7, 23–31. (a)Google Scholar
  14. 21.
    Johnson, S. M., & Lobitz, G. K. The personal and marital adjustment of parents as related to observed child deviance and parenting behaviors.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1974,2, 193–207. (b)Google Scholar
  15. 22.
    Johnson, S. M., Wahl, G., Martin, S., & Johansson, S. How deviant is the normal child? A behavioral analysis of the preschool child and his family. In R. D. Rubin, J. P. Brady, & J. D. Henderson (Eds.),Advances in behavior therapy (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press, 1973. Pp. 37–54.Google Scholar
  16. 23.
    Kanner, L. Do behavior symptoms always indicate psychopathplogy?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1960,1, 15–25.Google Scholar
  17. 24.
    Kent, R. N., O'Leary, K. D., Diament, C., & Dietz, A. Expectation biases in observational evaluation of therapeutic change.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974,42, 774–780.Google Scholar
  18. 25.
    Kogan, K. I., & Wimberger, H. C. Behavior transactions between disturbed children and their mothers.Psychological Reports, 1971,28, 395–404.Google Scholar
  19. 26.
    Lobitz, W. C., & Johnson, S. M. Parental manipulation of the behavior of normal and deviant children.Child Development, 1975,46, 719–726.Google Scholar
  20. 27.
    Miller, L. C., Hampe, E., Barrett, C. L., & Noble, H. Children's deviant behavior within the general population.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971,37, 16–22.Google Scholar
  21. 28.
    Novick, J., Rosenfeld, E., Bloch, D., & Dawson, D. Ascertaining deviant behavior in children.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1966,30, 230–238.Google Scholar
  22. 29.
    Oleinick, M. S., Bahn, A. K., Eisenberg, L., & Lilienfeld, A. M. Early socialization experiences and intrafamilial environment.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1966,15, 344–353.Google Scholar
  23. 30.
    Patterson, G. R. The aggressive child: Victim and architect of a coercive system. In L. A. Hamerlynck, L. D. Handy, & E. J. Mash (Eds.),Behavior modification and families. 1. Theory and research. 2. Applications and developments. New York: Brunner Mazel, 1976, in press.Google Scholar
  24. 31.
    Patterson, G. R., & Cobb, J. A. A dyadic analysis of “aggressive” behaviors. In J. P. Hill (Ed.),Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (Vol. 5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  25. 32.
    Patterson, G. R., Cobb, J. A., & Ray, R. S. A social engineering technology for retraining of aggressive boys. In H. Adams & L. Unikel (Eds.),Issues and trends in behavior therapy. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C Thomas, 1972.Google Scholar
  26. 33.
    Patterson, G. R., & Fagot, B. I. Selective responsiveness to social reinforcers and deviant behavior in children.Psychological Record, 1967,17, 369–378.Google Scholar
  27. 34.
    Patterson, G. R., Ray, R. S., Shaw, D. A., & Cobb, J. A.Manual for coding family interactions, sixth revision, 1969. Available from ASIS National Auxiliary Publications Service, in care of CCM Information Services, Inc., 909 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10022. Document #01234.Google Scholar
  28. 35.
    Patterson, G. R., & Reid, J. D. Reciprocity and coercion: Two facets of social systems. In C. Neuringer & J. L. Michael (Eds.),Behavior modification in clinical psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970.Google Scholar
  29. 36.
    Raush, H. L., Dittman, A. T., & Taylor, T. J. Person, setting, and change in social interaction.Human Relations, 1959,12, 361–377.Google Scholar
  30. 37.
    Rutter, M. Children of sick parents.Maudsley Monograph, 1966, No. 16.Google Scholar
  31. 38.
    Rutter, M. Parent-child separation: Psychological effects on the children.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1971,12, 233–260.Google Scholar
  32. 39.
    Rutter, M., & Graham, P. The reliability and validity of the psychiatric assessment of the child: I. Interview with the child.British Journal of Psychiatry, 1968,114, 563–579.Google Scholar
  33. 40.
    Schechtman, A. Age patterns in children's psychiatric symptoms.Child Development, 1970,41, 683–693.Google Scholar
  34. 41.
    Schulman, F. R., Shoemaker, D. J., & Moelis, I. Laboratory measurements of parental behavior.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1962,26, 109–114.Google Scholar
  35. 42.
    Shepherd, M., Oppenheim, A. N., & Mitchell, S. Childhood behavior disorders and the child guidance clinic: An epidemiological study.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1966,7, 39–52.Google Scholar
  36. 43.
    Sines, J. O., Paulker, J. D., Sines, L. K., & Owen, D. R. Identification of clinically relevant dimensions of children's behavior.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1969,33, 728–734.Google Scholar
  37. 44.
    Speer, D. C. Behavior problem checklist (Peterson-Quay): Baseline data from parents of child guidance and non-clinic children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971,36, 221–228.Google Scholar
  38. 45.
    Wahler, R. G. Oppositional children: A quest for reinforcement control.Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 1969,2, 159–170.Google Scholar
  39. 46.
    Walker, H. M., & Buckley, N. K. Teacher attention to appropriate and inappropriate classroom behavior: An individual case study.Focus on Exceptional Children, 1973,5, 5–11.Google Scholar
  40. 47.
    Wolff, S. Behavioral characteristics of primary school children referred to a psychiatric department.British Journal of Psychiatry, 1967,113, 885–893.Google Scholar
  41. 48.
    Wolff, S., & Acton, W. P. Characteristics of parents of disturbed children.British Journal of Psychiatry, 1968,114, 593–601.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gretchen K. Lobitz
    • 1
  • Stephen M. Johnson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OregonUSA

Personalised recommendations