Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 105–114 | Cite as

Psychostimulant medication and perceived intensity in hyperactive children

  • Barbara Henker
  • Laurie Astor-Dubin
  • James W. Varni
Article

Abstract

Adult ratings of children's activity, based on impressionistic scales, are good indicators of psychostimulant medication effects. These ratings seldom correlate with objective indicators, however, and their behavioral referents are poorly understood. Two separate studies tested the hypothesis that intensity of child behavior, as perceived by others, would differentiate medicated and unmedicated states. College student subjects assessed randomized videotaped segments of children's behaviors. The perceived intensity of hyperactive children's responses decreased with medication, while there were no medicationrelated changes in either gross motor locomotion or off-task behaviors. In a test for observer sensitization or expectancy, the results for subjects who were looking for medication effects did not differ from those for uninformed subjects.

Keywords

College Student Adult Rating Child Behavior Medication Effect Separate Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barkley, R. A. (1977). The effects of methylphenidate on various measures of activity level and attention in hyperactive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 5, 351–369.Google Scholar
  2. Barkley, R. A. (1981). Hyperactivity. In E. Mash & L. Terdal (Eds.),Behavioral assessment of childhood disorders (pp. 127–184). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barkley, R. A., & Cunningham, C. E. (1979). Stimulant drugs and activity levels in children.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 49, 491–499.Google Scholar
  4. Barkley, R., & Ullman, D. (1975). A comparison of objective measures of activity and distractibility in hyperactive and nonhyperactive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 3, 231–244.Google Scholar
  5. Buss, A. H., & Plomin, R. (1975).A temperament theory of personality development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Christensen, D., & Sprague, R. (1973). Reduction of hyperactive behavior by conditioning procedures alone and combined with methylphenidate.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 11, 331–333.Google Scholar
  7. Conners, C. K. (1969). A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children.American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 884–888.Google Scholar
  8. Conners, C. K. (1973). Rating scales for use in drug studies with children.Psychopharmacology Bulletin (Special issue: Pharmacotherapy of children), 24–84.Google Scholar
  9. Conners, C. K., & Taylor, E. (1980). Pemoline, methylphenidate, and placebo in children with minimal brain dysfunction.Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 922–930.Google Scholar
  10. Ellis, M. J., Witt, P. A. Reynolds, R., & Sprague, R. L. (1974). Methylphenidate and the activity of hyperactives in the informal setting.Child Development, 45, 217–220.Google Scholar
  11. Goyette, C. H., Conners, C. K., & Ulrich, R. F. (1978). Normative data on revised Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 221–236.Google Scholar
  12. Henker, B., Whalen, C. K., & Collins, B. E. (1979). Double-blind and triple-blind assessments of medication and placebo responses in hyperactive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 7, 1–13.Google Scholar
  13. Hinshaw, S. P., Henker, B., & Whalen, C. K. (1984). Self-control in hyperactive boys in angerinducing situations: Effects of cognitive-behavioral training and of methylphenidate.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 55–77.Google Scholar
  14. Porrino, L. J., Rapoport, J. L., Behar, D., Ismond, D. R., & Bunney, W. E. (1983). A naturalistic assessment of the motor activity of hyperactive boys: II. Stimulant drug effects.Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 688–693.Google Scholar
  15. Porrino, L. J., Rapoport, J. L., Behar, D., Sceery, W., Ismond, D. R., & Bunney, W. E. (1983). A naturalistic assessment of the motor activity of hyperactive boys: I. Comparison with normal controls.Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 681–687.Google Scholar
  16. Rapoport, J. L., Buchsbaum, M. S., Weingartner, H., Zahn, T. P., Ludlow, C., & Mikkelsen, E. J. (1980). Dextroamphetamine—Its cognitive and behavioral effects in normal and hyperactive boys and normal men.Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 933–943.Google Scholar
  17. Routh, D. K., & Schroeder, C. S. (1976). Standardized playroom measures as indices of hyperactivity.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 199–207.Google Scholar
  18. Schroeder, S. R., Milar, C., Wool, R., & Routh, D. K. (1980). Multiple measurement, transsituational diagnosis, and the concept of generalized overactivity.Journal of Pediatrie Psychology, 5, 365–375.Google Scholar
  19. Sleator, E. K., & von Neumann, A. W. (1974). Methylphenidate in the treatment of hyperkinetic children.Clinical Pediatrics, 13, 19–24.Google Scholar
  20. Sprague, R. L., Barnes, K. R., & Werry, J. S. (1970). Methylphenidate and thioridazine: Learning, reaction time, activity, and classroom behavior in disturbed children.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 40, 615–628.Google Scholar
  21. Varni, J. W., & Henker, B. (1979). A self-regulation approach to the treatment of three hyperactive boys.Child Behavior Therapy, 1, 171–192.Google Scholar
  22. Werry, J. S. (1968). Studies on the hyperactive child. IV. An empirical analysis of the minimal brain dysfunction syndrome.Archives of General Psychiatry, 19, 9–16.Google Scholar
  23. Werry, J. S., & Aman, M. G. (1975). Methylphenidate and haloperidol in children.Archives of General Psychiatry, 32, 790–795.Google Scholar
  24. Whalen, C. K., Collins, B. E., Henker, B., Alkus, S. R., Adams, D., & Stapp, J. (1978). Behavior observations of hyperactive children and methylphenidate (Ritalin) effects in systematically structured classroom environments: Now you see them, now you don't.Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 3, 177–187.Google Scholar
  25. Whalen, C. K., Henker, B., Collins, B. E., McAuliffe, S., & Vaux, A. (1979). Peer interaction in a structured communication task: Comparison of normal and hyperactive boys and of methylphenidate (Ritalin) and placebo effects.Child Development, 50, 388–401.Google Scholar
  26. Whalen, C. K., Henker, B., Dotemoto, S., Vaux, A., & McAuliffe, S. (1981). Hyperactivity and methylphenidate: Peer interaction styles. In K. D. Gadow & J. Loney (Eds.),Psychosocial aspects of drug treatment for hyperactivity (pp. 381–415). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Henker
    • 1
  • Laurie Astor-Dubin
    • 1
  • James W. Varni
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos Angeles
  2. 2.Orthopaedic Hospital and University of Southern CaliforniaUSA

Personalised recommendations