Innovative Higher Education

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 125–136 | Cite as

Contributions of active and dynamic self-regulation to learning

  • Asghar Iran-Nejad
  • Brad S. Chissom


Most modern cognitive theories postulate that active executive control is the only internal source of self-regulation of learning processes. To account for incidental and other categories of unintentional learning, this study explored the hypothesis that two independent sources of internal control regulate academic learning: (a) active (or executive) and (b) dynamic (or nonexecutive). College undergraduates completed an inventory of active and dynamic learning processes. The findings supported the twosource hypothesis. Moreover, when the contribution of dynamic self-regulation was removed, the correlation between active self-regulation and learning was no longer significant. When active self-regulation was removed, the correlation between dynamic self-regulation and learning remained basically the same.


Social Psychology Learning Process Internal Control Cognitive Theory Cross Cultural Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, J.R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill.Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, R.C., & Shiffrin, R.M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K.W. Spence & J.T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 90–97). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bereiter, C. (1990). Aspects of an Educational Learning Theory.Review of Educational Research, 60, 603–624.Google Scholar
  4. Blackwell, P.M., Engen, E., Fischgrund, J.E., & Zarcadoolas, C. (1978).Sentences and other systems: A language and learning curriculum for hearing-impaired children. Washington, DC: The Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.Google Scholar
  5. Chissom, B., Iran-Nejad, A., & Burry, J.A. (1989, August).Development of an instrument to assess learning strategies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  6. Corno, L. (1989). Self-regulated learning: A volitional analysis. In B.J. Zimmerman & D.H. Schunk (Eds.),Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 111–142). NY: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1913).Interest and effort in education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  8. Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work.Review of Educational Research, 53, 159–199.Google Scholar
  9. Harre, R. (1984).Personal being: A theory for Individual Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Iran-Nejad, A. (1986). Understanding surprise ending stories.Journal of Mind and Behavior, 7, 37–62.Google Scholar
  11. Iran-Nejad, A. (1987). Cognitive and affective causes of intrest and liking.Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 120–130.Google Scholar
  12. Iran-Nejad, A. (1990). Active and dynamic self-regulation of learning processes.Review of Educational Research, 60, 573–602.Google Scholar
  13. Iran-Nejad, A. & Cecil, C. (1992). Interest and learning: A biofunctional perspective. In K.A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Knapp (Eds.),The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Iran-Nejad, A., & Chissom, B. (1988, August).Active and dynamic sources of self-regulation in learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  15. Iran-Nejad, A., & Ortony, A. (1984). A biofunctional model of distributed mental content, mental structures, awareness, and attention.The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 5, 171–210.Google Scholar
  16. Iran-Nejad, A., Ortony, A., & Rittenhouse, R.K., (1981). The comprehension of metaphorical uses of English by deaf children.American Speech-Language-Hearing Associations, 24, 551–556.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, M.K., & Hasher, L. (1987). Human learning and memory.Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 631–668.Google Scholar
  18. Klein, L.S. (1989).Instructional interactions that encourage learning disabled students' dependency on teachers. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
  19. Palinscar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities.Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.Google Scholar
  20. Robinson, F.P. (1961).Effective study. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  21. Schmeck, R.R. (1988).Learning strategies and learning styles. NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
  22. Schneider, W. (1985). Categorization (restructuring) and automatization: Two separable factors.Psychological review, 92, 424–428.Google Scholar
  23. Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.Google Scholar
  24. Weinstein, C.E., Goetz, E.T., & Alexander, P. A. (1988). (Eds.).Learning and study strategies. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Asghar Iran-Nejad
  • Brad S. Chissom

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations