Skip to main content
Log in

“Kramer vs. Kramer” vs. Kramer: A child's rights ignored

  • Published:
Bioethics Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The media continue to exercise power in transmitting values. “Kramer vs. Kramer” made film history recently by claiming an impressive number of Oscars. Written reviews and televised acclamations repeatedly cited the authentic and sympathetic treatment of the parents. However, consistent with society's present attitude toward children, the ethical and legal rights of the child were not addressed. The plot underscored the paternalistic and utilitarian manner by which we approach problem-solving and decision-making which directly involve and affect children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

She has 18 years experience as an educator in the United States and East Africa and is a free lance writer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colburn-Rohn, E. “Kramer vs. Kramer” vs. Kramer: A child's rights ignored. Bioethics Quarterly 2, 247–251 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917117

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917117

Keywords

Navigation