Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 317–326 | Cite as

The assessment of impulsivity and mediating behaviors in hyperactive and nonhyperactive boys

  • Michael Gordon


Twenty boys (6–8 years) rated by their teachers as hyperactive and a matched sample of nonhyperactive boys performed a task that required them to withhold responding for a set time interval in order to be rewarded (DRL 6-second schedule). Half of each group worked on a one-button console while the other half was provided with additional collateral buttons. Results indicated that hyperactive children were relatively unable to perform efficiently on the task, and that this deficit endured regardless of age, IQ, or experimental condition. DRL was thus found to discriminate accurately between teacher-rated and parent-rated hyperactive and nonhyperactive children. Furthermore, a wide variety of self-generated mediating behaviors was observed, and it was determined that a child's DRL performance was related to the kind of mediating behaviors he displayed. Results are discussed in terms of the clinical assessment of hyperactivity and the training of impulsive children.


Clinical Assessment Matched Sample Additional Collateral Hyperactive Child Impulsive Child 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bruner, A., & Revusky, S. A. Collateral behavior in humans.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1961,4, 349–350.Google Scholar
  2. Cantwell, D. P.The hyperactive child: Diagnosis, management, current research. New York: Spectrum Publications, 1975.Google Scholar
  3. Conners, C. K. A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1969,126, 152–156.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, K., Sprague, R., & Werry, J. Stereotyped behavior and activity level in severe retardates: The effects of drugs.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1969,72, 721–727.Google Scholar
  5. Doubros, S., & Daniels, G. An experimental approach to the reduction of overactive behavvior.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1966,4, 251–258.Google Scholar
  6. Douglas, V. I. Stop, look and listen: The problem of sustained attention and impulse control in hyperactive and normal children.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 1972,4, 259–282.Google Scholar
  7. Gittis, A., & Hothersall, D. DRL performance of juvenile rats with septal lesions.Physiological Psychology, 1974,2, 38–42.Google Scholar
  8. Hothersall, D., Alexander, D., & Slonaker, R. The DRL deficit of rats with septal lesions: Effects of extended training in a mediated environmentPsychonomic Science, 1972,29(1), 34–36.Google Scholar
  9. Hutt, D., Jackson, P., & Level, M. Behavior parameters and drug effects: A study of a hyperkinetic epileptic child.Epilepsia, 1966,7, 250–259.Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, C. F. Limits on the measurement of activity levels in children using ultrasound and photoelectric cells.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1972,77, 301–310.Google Scholar
  11. Lee, D., & Hutt, C. A play-room designed for filming children: A note.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1964,5, 263–265.Google Scholar
  12. McConnel, T. B., Cromwell, R. F., & Bialev, I. A. Studies in activity level: VIII.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1964,68, 647–651.Google Scholar
  13. Ounsted, C. The hyperactive syndrome in epileptic children.Lancet, 1955,269, 303–311.Google Scholar
  14. Randolph, J. J. A further examination of collateral behavior in humans.Psychonomic Science, 1964,3, 227–228.Google Scholar
  15. Schulman, J. L., & Reisman, J. M. An objective measure of hyperactivity.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1959,64, 455–456.Google Scholar
  16. Slonaker, R. L. & Hothersall, D. Collateral behaviors and the DRL deficit of rats with septal lesions.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972,80, 91–96.Google Scholar
  17. Stein, N., & Flanagan, S. Human DRL performance, collateral behavior and verbalization of the reinforcement contingency.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1974,3, 27–28.Google Scholar
  18. Stein, N., & Landis, R. Mediating role of human collateral behavior during a spaced responding schedule of reinforcement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,97, 28–33.Google Scholar
  19. Stein, N., & Landis, R. Differential reinforcement of low rates performance by impulsive and reflective children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1975,19, 37–50.Google Scholar
  20. Weisberg, P., & Tragakis, C. J. Analyses of DRL behavior in young children.Psychological Report, 1967,21, 709–715.Google Scholar
  21. Werry, J. S., Sprague, R. L., & Cohen, M. N. Conners' Teacher Rating Scale for use in drug studies with children: An empirical study.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1975,3(3), 217–229.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Gordon
    • 1
  1. 1.The Ohio State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations