Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 275–286 | Cite as

The utility of tracking child behavior

  • Mark R. Weinrott
Article

Abstract

To assess the impact of observation training and tracking of child behavior, each of 20 elementary school teachers participating in a behavior modification practicum was assigned to either an experimental or a control group. For each teacher, a disruptive, distractible child was identified as appropriate for behavioral intervention. All teachers were taught identical intervention strategies, but the two groups differed in the degree to which teachers were initially trained and subsequently required to observe and record discrete child behaviors. Multiple measures were used to assess the influence of monitoring child behaviors. These included observed child behavior, observed teacher behavior, teacher ratings, and correspondence between teacher perception and child behavior. Results showed that tracking the behavior of children had little or no effect on any measure.

Keywords

Intervention Strategy Elementary School Behavior Modification Behavioral Intervention Child Behavior 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barrish, H. H., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M. M. Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969,2, 119–124.Google Scholar
  2. Erickson, M. R. The effects of initial information and observational set upon social perception (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1973).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1974,34, 4659B.Google Scholar
  3. Goldschmidt, D. L. The effects of systematic observation on adults' perception of behavior change in children (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1975).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1976,36, 4688B.Google Scholar
  4. Mines, P. A. How adults perceive children: The effect of behavior tracking and expected deviance on teachers' impressions of a child (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1974).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1975,35, 4176B.Google Scholar
  5. Kent, R. N., O'Leary, K. D., Diament, C., & Dietz, A. Expectation biases in observational evaluation of therapeutic change.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974,42, 774–780.Google Scholar
  6. Medland, M. B., & Stachnik, T. J. Good behavior game: A replication and systematic analysis.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1972,5, 45–51.Google Scholar
  7. O'Leary, K. D., & O'Leary, S. G.Classroom management: The successful use of behavior modification. New York: Pergamon Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  8. Patterson, G. R.Families. Champaign, Illinois: Research Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  9. Patterson, G. R., Cobb, J. A., & Ray, R. S. A social engineering technology for retraining the families of aggressive boys. In H. E. Adams & I. P. Unikel (Eds.),Issues and trends in behavior therapy. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C Thomas, 1973.Google Scholar
  10. Schaefer, H. H., & Martin, P. L.Behavioral therapy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.Google Scholar
  11. Shuller, D. W., & McNamara, J. R. Expectancy factors in behavioral observation.Behavior Therapy, 1976,7, 519–527.Google Scholar
  12. Wahler, R. G., & Leske, G. Accurate and inaccurate observer summary reports.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1973,156, 386–394.Google Scholar
  13. Walter, H., & Gilmore, S. K. Placebo versus social learning effects in parent training procedures designed to alter the behaviors of aggressive boys.Behavior Therapy, 1973,4, 361–377.Google Scholar
  14. Watson, L. S.Child behavior modification: A manual for teachers, nurses and parents. New York: Pergamon Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  15. Weinrott, M. R. Improving the validity of global ratings.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1977,5, 187–197.Google Scholar
  16. Weinrott, M. R., Bauske, B. W., & Patterson, G. Systematic replication of a social learning approach to parent training. In P. O. Sjöden & S. Bates (Eds.),Trends in behavior therapy. New York: Academic Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark R. Weinrott
    • 1
  1. 1.Evaluation Research Group, Inc.Eugene

Personalised recommendations