Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 331–345 | Cite as

Agreement between teachers' ratings and observations of hyperactivity, inattentiveness, and defiance

  • Russell Schachar
  • Seija Sandberg
  • Michael Rutter
Article

Abstract

The relationship of directly observed classroom behavior and teacher ratings on questionnaires with a judgmental (Conners Teacher Rating Scale) or operational format was examined for 33 boys aged 6 years 5 months to 7 years 7 months. Results showed a high degree of association between observed and rated behavior. This association did not vary with the format of the rating scales but did vary with the nature of the behavior being rated. Defiance was more reliably rated than hyperactivity or inattentiveness. Several behaviors exerted a halo effect on ratings of hyperactivity, inattentiveness, and behavior problems. In particular, defiance toward a teacher increased the likelihood that a child would be rated as hyperactive or inattentive regardless of his observed level of activity or attentiveness. These results support the validity of behavior rating scales as screening measures for hyperactivity, inattentiveness, and defiance and indicate that a child's defiance and disobedience are significant causes of misclassification.

Keywords

Behavior Problem Operational Format Teacher Rate Behavior Rating Classroom Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abikoff, H., Gittelman-Klein, R., & Klein, D. F. (1977). Validation of a classroom observation code for hyperactive children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 772–783.Google Scholar
  2. Abikoff, H., Gittelman-Klein, R., & Klein, D. F. (1980). Classroom observation code for hyperactive children: A replication of validity.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 555–565.Google Scholar
  3. Blunden, D., Spring, C., & Greenberg, L. M. (1974). Validation of the classroom behavior inventory.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 84–88.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, S. B., Schleifer, M., & Weiss, G. (1978). Continuities in maternal reports and child behaviors over time in hyperactive and comparison groups.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 33–45.Google Scholar
  5. Conners, C. K. (1969). A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children.American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 884–888.Google Scholar
  6. Conners, C. K. (1970). Symptom patterns in hyperkinetic, neurotic, and normal children.Child Development, 41, 667–682.Google Scholar
  7. Conners, C. K. (1973). Rating scales in drug studies with children.Psychopharmacology Bulletin, Special Issue (Pharmacotherapy of Children), 24–29.Google Scholar
  8. Conners, C. K., & Werry, J. S. (1979). Pharmacotherapy. In H. C. Quay & J. S. Werry (Eds.),Psychopathological disorders of childhood (2nd ed., pp. 336–386). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Copeland, A. P., & Weissbrod, C. S. (1978). Behavioral correlates of the hyperactivity factor of the Conners Teacher Questionnaire.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 339–343.Google Scholar
  10. Douglas, V. I., Parry, P., Marton, P., & Garson, C. (1976). Assessment of a cognitive training program for hyperactive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 389–410.Google Scholar
  11. Eisenberg, L., & Conners, C. K. (1971). Psychopharmacology in childhood. In N. B. Talbot, J. Kager, & L. Eisenberg (Eds.),Behavioral science in pediatric medicine (pp. 397–424). Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  12. Frick, T., & Semmel, M. I. (1978). Observer agreement and reliabilities of classroom observational measures.Review of Educational Research, 48, 157–184.Google Scholar
  13. Goyette, C. H., Conners, C. K., & Ulrich, R. F. (1978). Normative data on revised Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 221–236.Google Scholar
  14. Guilford, J. P. (1954).Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Jacob, R. G., O'Leary, K. D., & Rosenblad, C. (1978). Formal and informal classroom settings: Effects on hyperactivity.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 47–59.Google Scholar
  16. Kazdin, A. E., Esveldt-Dawson, K., & Loar, L. L. (1983). Correspondence of teacher ratings and direct observations of classroom behavior of psychiatric inpatient children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 11, 549–564.Google Scholar
  17. Kent, R. N., O'Leary, K. D., Diament, C., & Dietz, A. (1974). Expectation biases in observational evaluation of therapeutic change.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 774–780.Google Scholar
  18. Kupietz, D., Bialer, I., & Winsberg, B. G. (1972). A behavior rating scale for assessing improvement in behaviorally deviant children: A preliminary investigation.American Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 1432–1436.Google Scholar
  19. McGee, R., Williams, S., & Silva, P. A. (1984). Behavioral and developmental characteristics of aggressive, hyperactive and aggressive-hyperactive boys.Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 23, 270–279.Google Scholar
  20. Neisworth, J. T., Kurtz, P. D., Jones, R. T., & Madie, R. P. (1974). Biasing of hyperkinetic behavior ratings by diagnostic reports.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2, 323–329.Google Scholar
  21. Prinz, R. J., Connor, P. A., & Wilson, C. C. (1981). Hyperactive and aggressive behaviors in childhood: Intertwined dimensions.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 9, 191–202.Google Scholar
  22. Rapoport, J. L., & Benoit, M. (1975). The relation of direct home observations to the clinical evaluation of hyperactive school age boys.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16, 141–147.Google Scholar
  23. Reid, J. B. (1970). Reliability assessment of observational data: a possible methodological problem.Child Development, 41, 1143–1150.Google Scholar
  24. Sandberg, S. T. (1981). The overinclusiveness of the diagnosis of hyperkinetic syndrome. In M. Gittelman (Ed.),Strategic interventions for hyperactive children (pp. 8–38). Armonk, New York: ME. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  25. Sandberg, S. T., Wieselberg, M., & Shaffer, D. (1980). Hyperkinetic and conduct problem children in a primary school population: Some epidemiological considerations.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 21, 293–311.Google Scholar
  26. Shuller, D. Y., & McNamara, J. R. (1976). Expectancy factors in behavioral observation.Behavior Therapy, 7, 519–527.Google Scholar
  27. Siegel, L. J., Dragovich, S. L., & Marholin, D., III. (1976). The effects of biasing information on behavioral observations and rating scales.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 221–233.Google Scholar
  28. Spitzer, R. L. (Chairperson). (1980). DSM-III: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (3rd ed.). Washington: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  29. Sprague, R. L., Christensen, D. E., & Werry, J. S. (1974). Experimental psychology and stimulant drugs. In C. K. Conners (Ed.),Clinical use of stimulant drugs in children (pp. 141–164). The Hague: Excerpta Medica.Google Scholar
  30. Sprague, R. L., Cohen, M. N., & Werry, J. S. (1974).Normative data on the Corners' Teaching Rating Scale and Abbreviated Scale (Technical Report, November, 1974b, USPHS Grant #MH 18909. Final report, Children's Research Center) (pp. 140–145b). Champaign, Illinois: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  31. Sprague, R. L., & Sleator, E. K. (1973). Effects of psychopharmacologic agents on learning disorders.Pediatric Clinics of North America, 20, 719–735.Google Scholar
  32. Stevens-Long, J. (1973). The effect of behavioral context on some aspects of adult disciplinary practice and affect.Child Development, 44, 476–484.Google Scholar
  33. Wahler, R. G., & Leske, G. (1973). Accurate and inaccurate observer summary reports.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 156, 386–394.Google Scholar
  34. Werry, J., & Sprague, R. L. (1974). Methylphenidate in children — effect of dosage.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 8, 9–19.Google Scholar
  35. World Health Organization. (1978).Mental disorders: Glossary and guide to their classification in accordance with the ninth revision of the International Classification of Diseases. Geneva: Author.Google Scholar
  36. Ysseldyke, J. E.,& Foster, G. G. (1978). Bias in teachers' observations of emotionally disturbed and learning disabled children.Exceptional Children, 44, 613–615.Google Scholar
  37. Zentall, S. S., & Barack, R. S. (1979). Rating scales for hyperactivity: Concurrent validity, reliability, and decisions to label for the Conners and Davids abbreviated scales.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 7, 179–190.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Russell Schachar
    • 1
  • Seija Sandberg
    • 2
  • Michael Rutter
    • 2
  1. 1.The Hospital for Sick ChildrenToronto
  2. 2.Institute of PsychiatryLondon

Personalised recommendations