Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 191–204 | Cite as

Hyperactivity and frustration: The influence of control over and size of rewards in delaying gratification

  • Mark D. Rapport
  • Susan B. Tucker
  • George J. DuPaul
  • Michele Merlo
  • Gary Stoner


This study examined the differential effects of frustration on normal children and those diagnosed as having Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity. Each group consisted of 16 boys between the ages of 6 and 8 years who were prematched for age, grade, and classroom placement. All children completed a series of arithmetic problems in order to earn toy rewards. Using a variant of Mischel's (1974) delay-of-gratification paradigm, children were presented with two choice-of-delay conditions in a randomly assigned, counterbalanced sequence: (1) a free-choice conflict situation involving a longpassive or short-active reward delay, and (2) a short-active delay. Results showed that a significantly greater proportion of hyperactive children chose to complete problems for an immediate reward compared to their normal control counterparts (p < .01). Group differences were no longer apparent in the short-active delay trial. The results are discussed in terms of frustration tolerance and contributing factors such as cognitive-attentional style. Implications for treatment and future directions are delineated.


Normal Control Contribute Factor Great Proportion Differential Effect Attention Deficit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1980).Diagnostic and Statistical Manual: DSM-III (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A., & Walters, R. (1981). Aggression. In H. Stevenson (Ed.),Child psychology (pp. 364–415). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barkley, R. A. (1981).Hyperactive children: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barkley, R. A., & Jackson, T. L. (1977). Hyperkinesis, autonomic nervous system activity and stimulant drug effects.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 18, 347–357.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, S. B., & Douglas, V. I. (1972). Cognitive styles and responses to the threat of frustration.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 4, 30–42.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, S. B., Douglas, V. I. & Morgenstern, G. (1971). Cognitive styles in hyperactive children and the effect of methylphenidate.Journal of Chilli Psychology and Psychiatry, 12, 55–67.Google Scholar
  7. Conners, C. K., & Eisenberg, L. (1963). The effects of methylphenidate on symptomatology and learning in disturbed children.American Journal of Psychiatry, 120, 458–464.Google Scholar
  8. Conners, C., Rothschild, G., Eisenberg, L., Stone, L., & Robinson, E. (1969). Dextroamphetamine in children with learning disorders.Archives of General Psychiatry, 21, 182–190.Google Scholar
  9. Denton, C. L., & McIntyre, C. W. (1978). Span of apprehension in hyperactive boys.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 19–24.Google Scholar
  10. Douglas, V. I. (1965). Children's responses to frustration. A developmental study.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 19, 161–171.Google Scholar
  11. Douglas, V. I. (1972). Stop, look and listen: The problem of sustained attention and impulse control in hyperactive and normal children.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science.4, 259–282.Google Scholar
  12. Douglas, V. I. (1974). Sustained attention and impulse control: Implications for the handicapped child. In J. A. Swets & L. L. Elliot (Eds.),Psychology and the handicapped child (pp. 149–168). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Education.Google Scholar
  13. Douglas, V. I., Parry, P., Marton, P., & Garson, C. (1976). Assessment of a cognitive training program for hyperactive boys.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 389–410.Google Scholar
  14. Dunn, L. M., & Markwardt, F. C. (1970).Peabody Individual Achievement Test. Circle Pines, Minnesota: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  15. Fenichel, O. (1945).The psychoanalytic theory of neurosis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  16. Firestone, P., & Douglas, V. (1975). The effects of reward and punishment on reaction times and autonomic activity in hyperactive and normal children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 3, 201–216.Google Scholar
  17. Freibergs, V., & Douglas, V. I. (1969). Concept learning in hyperactive and normal children.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 388–395.Google Scholar
  18. Goldberg, J. P., & Konstantareas, M. M. (1981). Vigilance in hyperactive and normal children on a self-paced operant task.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 22, 55–63.Google Scholar
  19. Hollingshead, A. B. (1975).Four factor index of social status. New Haven: Yale University, Department of Sociology.Google Scholar
  20. Homatidis, S., & Konstantareas, M. M. (1981). Assessment of hyperactivity: Isolating measures of high discriminant ability.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 533–541.Google Scholar
  21. Horwitz, S. (1981, May).Diagnosing error patterns in mathematics. Worshop presentation at the CSDE Title I Spring Conference, Meriden, Connecticut.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, R. L. (1966). The hyperkinetic child: Some consensually validated behavioral correlates.Exceptional Children, 32, 635–637.Google Scholar
  23. Kagan, J., Rosman, B. L., Day, D., Albert, J., & Phillips, W. (1964). Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes.Psychological Monographs,78(1, Whole No. 578).Google Scholar
  24. Kendall, P. C., & Finch, A. J. (1978). A cognitive-behavioral treatment for impulsivity: A group comparison study.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 110–118.Google Scholar
  25. Lahey, B. B., Green, K. D., & Forehand, R. (1980). On the independence of ratings of hyperactivity, conduct problems, and attention deficits in children: A multiple regression analysis.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 566–574.Google Scholar
  26. Meichenbaum, D. H., & Goodman, J. (1971). Training impulsive children to talk to themselves: A means of developing self-control.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 115–126.Google Scholar
  27. Menkes, M. M., Rowe, J. S., & Menkes, J. H. (1967). A twenty-five year follow-up on the hyperkinetic child with minimum brain dysfunction.Pediatrics, 39, 393–399.Google Scholar
  28. Minde, K., Lewin, D., Weiss, G., Lavigueur, H., Douglas, V., & Sykes, E. (1971). The hyperactive child in elementary school: A 5-year, controlled follow-up.Exceptional Children, 38, 215–221.Google Scholar
  29. Mischel, W. (1974). Process in delay of gratification. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 249–292). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Mischel, W. (1979). On the interface of cognition and personality. Beyond the person-situation debate.American Psychologist, 34, 740–754.Google Scholar
  31. Mischel, W. (1980). Metacognition and the rules of delay. In J. H. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.),Social cognitive development: Frontiers and possible futures (pp. 240–271). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Mischel, W., & Ebbesen, E. (1970). Attention in delay of gratification.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 204–218.Google Scholar
  33. Mischel, W., & Mischel, H. N. (1979, March 18).The development of children's knowledge of self-control. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  34. Mischel, W., & Moore, B. (1973). Effects of attention to symbolically presented rewards upon self-control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 172–179.Google Scholar
  35. Mischel, W., & Moore, B. (1980). The role of ideation in voluntary delay for symbolically presented awards.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 211–221.Google Scholar
  36. Moore, B., Mischel, W., & Zeiss, A. (1976). Comparative effects of the reward stimulus and its cognitive representation in voluntary delay.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 419–424.Google Scholar
  37. Parry, P. A., & Douglas, V. I. (1983). Effects of reinforcement on concept identification in hyperactive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 11, 327–340.Google Scholar
  38. Rapoport, D. (1951).Organization and pathology of thought. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rapport, M. D., DuPaul, G. J., Stoner, G., Birmingham, B. K., & Masse, G. (1985). Attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity: Differential effects of methylphenidate on impulsivity.Pediatrics, 76, 938–943.Google Scholar
  40. Rapport, M. D., Murphy, A., & Bailey, J. S. (1980). The effects of a response cost treatment tactic on hyperactive children.Journal of School Psychology, 18, 98–111.Google Scholar
  41. Rapport, M. D., Murphy, A., & Bailey, J. S. (1982). Ritalin vs. response cost in the control of hyperactive children: A within subject comparison.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 205–216.Google Scholar
  42. Riddle, K. D., & Rapoport, J. L. (1976). A 2-year follow-up of 72 hyperactive boys. Classroom behavior and peer acceptance.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 162, 126–134.Google Scholar
  43. Routh, D. K., Schroeder, C. S., & O'Tuama, L. (1974). Development of activity level in children.Developmental Psychology, 10, 163–168.Google Scholar
  44. Skinner, B. F. (1969).Waiden Two. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Stevenson, H. W. (1972).Children's learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  46. Sykes, D. H., Douglas, V. I., & Morgenstern, G. (1973). Sustained attention in hyperactive children.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 14, 213.Google Scholar
  47. Thurston, C. M., Sobol, M. P., Swanson, J., & Kinsbourne, M. (1979). Effects of methylphenidate (Ritalin) on selective attention in hyperactive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 7, 471–481.Google Scholar
  48. Weiss, G. (1975). The natural history of hyperactivity in childhood and treatment with stimulant medication at different ages: A summary of research findings.International Journal of Mental Health, 4, 213–226.Google Scholar
  49. Weiss, G., & Hechtman, L. (1979). The hyperactive child syndrome.Science, 205, 1348–1353.Google Scholar
  50. Weiss, G., Minde, K., Werry, J., Douglas, V., & Nemeth, E. (1971). Studies of the hyperactive child-VIII. Five year follow-up.Archives of General Psychiatry, 21, 409–414.Google Scholar
  51. Werry, J., Sprague, R., & Cohen, M. (1975). Conners Teacher Rating Scale for use in drug studies with children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 3, 217–229.Google Scholar
  52. Whalen, C. K., Collins, B. E., Henker, B., Alkus, S. R., Adams, D., & Stapp, J. (1978). Behavior observations of hyperactive children and methylphenidate (Ritalin) effects in systematically structured classroom environments: Now you see them, now you don't.Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 3, 177–187.Google Scholar
  53. Wikoff, R. L. (1976). Correlational and factor analysis of the Peabody Individual Achievement Test and the WISC-R.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 322–325.Google Scholar
  54. Wright, M. E. (1943). The influence of frustration upon the social relations of young children.Character and Personality, 12, 111–122.Google Scholar
  55. Yates, B. T., & Mischel, W. (1979). Young children's preferred attentional strategies for delaying gratification.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 286–300.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark D. Rapport
    • 1
  • Susan B. Tucker
    • 1
  • George J. DuPaul
    • 1
  • Michele Merlo
    • 1
  • Gary Stoner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Rhode IslandKingston

Personalised recommendations