Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 347–364 | Cite as

Yale Children's Inventory (YCI): An instrument to assess children with attentional deficits and learning disabilities I. Scale development and psychometric properties

  • Sally E. Shaywitz
  • Carla Schnell
  • Bennett A. Shaywitz
  • Virginia R. Towle
Article

Abstract

The Yale Children's Inventory (YCI), a parent based rating scale, and the scales derived from it have been developed to identify and measure multiple dimensions of learning disabilities with particular emphasis on attentional deficits. Scale construction was based on factor analytic procedures. Measures of internal consistency, test retest reliability, and coefficients of congruence support the reliability and stability of the 11 scales. A discriminant function classified normal and learning disabled children with a relatively high rate of accuracy. The relationship and content of the three relevant YCI scales were compared to the DSM-III diagnostic categories for ADD. As operationalized, DSM-III criteria for hyperactivity formed a cohesive factor, while criteria for attention and impulsivity were not distinguishable from each other since they loaded together on a single factor. In contrast, the equivalent YCI scales for attention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity were found to be distinct.

Keywords

Internal Consistency Analytic Procedure Psychometric Property Discriminant Function Test Retest Reliability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achenbach, T. M. (1978). The Child Behavior Profile: I. Boys aged 6–11.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 478–488.Google Scholar
  2. Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1979). The Child Behavior Profile: II. Boys aged 12–16 and girls aged 6–11 and 12–16.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 222–233.Google Scholar
  3. Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1984). Psychopathology of childhood.Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 227–256.Google Scholar
  4. American Psychiatric Association (1980).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.Google Scholar
  5. Bosco, J. J., & Robin, S. S. (1980). Hyperkinesis: Prevalence and treatment. In C. K. Whalen & B. Henker (Eds.),Hyperactive children: The social ecology of identification and treatment (pp. 173–187). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cantwell, D. P. (Ed.). (1975).The hyperactive child: Diagnosis, management, current research (pp. 203–215). New York: Spectrum.Google Scholar
  7. Cantwell, D. P. (1978). Hyperactivity and social behavior.Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 1, 252–262.Google Scholar
  8. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The Stress test for the number of factors.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.Google Scholar
  9. Conners, C. K. (1969). A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children.American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 152–156.Google Scholar
  10. Conners, C. K. (1970). Symptom patterns in hyperactive, neurotic and normal children.Child Development, 41, 667–682.Google Scholar
  11. Conners, C. K. (1973). Rating scales for use in drug studies with children.Psychopharmacology Bulletin (Special issue, Pharmacology of Children), 24–29.Google Scholar
  12. Douglas, V. I. (1972). Stop, look, and listen: The problem of sustained attention and impulse control in hyperactive and normal children.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 4, 259–282.Google Scholar
  13. Douglas, V. I., & Peters, K. G. (1979). Toward a clearer definition of the attentional deficit of hyperactive children. In G. Hale & M. Lewis (Eds.),Attention and the development of cognitive style (pp. 173–247). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dreger, R. M. (1981). First-, second-, and third-order factors from the children's behavioral classification project instrument and an attempt at rapprochement.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 252–260.Google Scholar
  15. Dykman, R., Ackerman, P. T., Clements, S. D., & Peters, J. E. (1971). Specific learning disabilities: An attentional deficit syndrome. In H. Myklebust (Ed.),Progress in learning disabilities (Vol. 2, pp. 56–93). New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
  16. Gittelman, R. (1983, February),Follow-up study of hyperactive children: A preliminary report. Paper presented at the University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  17. Gorsuch, R. L. (1974).Factor analysis. Philadelphia; W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
  18. Harman, H. H. (1690).Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hechtman, L., & Weiss, G. (1983). Long-term outcome of hyperactive children.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 53, 532–541.Google Scholar
  20. Hollingshead, A. B. (1957).Two factor index of social position. Unpublished working paper, Yale University.Google Scholar
  21. Jenkins, R. L., & Hewitt, L. (1944). Types of personality structure encountered in child guidance clinics.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 14, 84–94.Google Scholar
  22. Keogh, B. K., & MacMillan, D. L. (1983). The logic of sample selection: Who represents what?Exceptional Educational Quarterly, 4, 84–96.Google Scholar
  23. Keogh, B. K., Major, S. M., Reid, H. P., Gandara, P., & Omori, H. (1978). Marker variables: A search for comparability and generalizability in the field of learning disabilities.Learning Disability Quarterly, 1, 5–11.Google Scholar
  24. Keogh, B. K., Major, S. M., Reid, H. P., Omori, H., & Gandara, P. (1980). Proposed markers in learning disabilities research.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8, 21–31.Google Scholar
  25. Lahey, B. B., Green, K. D., & Forehand, R. (1980). On the independence of ratings of hyperactivity, conduct problems and attention deficits in children: A multiple regression analysis.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 566–574.Google Scholar
  26. Lahey, B. B., Stempniak, M., Robinson, E. J., & Tyroler, M. H., (1978). Hyperactivity and learning disabilities as independent dimensions of child behavior problems.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 333–340.Google Scholar
  27. Loney, J., Langhorne, J. E., & Paternite, C. E. (1978). Empirical basis for subgrouping the hyperkinetic/minimal brain dysfunction syndrome.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 431–441.Google Scholar
  28. Miller, L. C. (1967). Louisville Behavior Check List for males 6–12 years of age.Psychological Reports, 21, 885–896.Google Scholar
  29. Puig-Antich, J., &Chambers, W. (1978).The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age children (Kiddie-SADS). New York: New York State Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  30. Quay, H. C. (1979). Classification. In H. C. Quay & J. S. Werry (Eds.),Psychopathological disorders of childhood (pp. 1–42). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Quay, H. C. (1983). A dimensional approach to behavior disorder: The Revised Behavior Problem Checklist.School Psychology Review, 12, 244–249.Google Scholar
  32. Quay, H. C., & Peterson, D. R. (1983).Interim manual for the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. Coral Gables: University of Miami.Google Scholar
  33. Ross, D. M., & Ross, S. A. (1976).Hyperactivity: Research, theory and action (pp. 23–60). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Routh, D. K. (1980). Developmental and social aspects of hyperactivity. In C. K. Whalen & B. Henker (Eds.),Hyperactive children: The social ecology of identification and treatment (pp. 55–73). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rutter, M. (1978). Prevalence and types of dyslexia. In A. L. Benton & D. Pearl (Eds.),Dyslexia: An appraisal of current knowledge (pp. 5–28). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Silver, L. B. (1981). The relationship between learning disabilities, hyperactivity, distractability and behavioral problems.Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 20, 385–387.Google Scholar
  37. Skinner, H. A. (1981). Toward the integration of classification theory and methods.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 36, 861–867.Google Scholar
  38. Thurstone, L. L. (1947).Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tucker, L. R. (1951).A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies (Personnel Research Section Report, No. 984). Washington, D.C.: Department of the Army.Google Scholar
  40. United States Office of Education (1977). Assistance to states for education for handicapped children: Procedures for evaluating specific learning disabilities.Federal Register, 42(250), 62082–62085.Google Scholar
  41. Werry, J., Sprague, R., & Cohen, M. (1975). Conners Teacher Rating Scale for use in drug studies with children—An empirical study.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 3, 217–229.Google Scholar
  42. Whalen, C. K. & Henker, B. (1976). Psychostimulants in children: A review and analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1113–1130.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sally E. Shaywitz
    • 1
  • Carla Schnell
    • 1
  • Bennett A. Shaywitz
    • 1
  • Virginia R. Towle
    • 1
  1. 1.Learning Disorders Unit, Department of PediatricsYale University School of MedicineNew Haven

Personalised recommendations