Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 457–462 | Cite as

Reflection-impulsivity in normal and behavior-disordered children

  • Ronald T. Brown
  • Lorene C. Quay
Article

Abstract

The primary index of reflection- impulsivity is Kagan's Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFF), which yields both a latency and an error score. To evaluate further the construct validity of these measures, both the latency and error scores of 9- and 15-year-old normal and “acting-out” behavior-disordered children were compared. Young behavior-disordered children were found to be more impulsive than the other groups on the MFF error measure. No differences occurred on the MFF latency measure. This result is consistent with previous findings with normal children in supporting the construct validity of the MFF error score and raising questions about the construct validity of the MFF latency score. Findings were inconsistent with Kagan's assertion that normal children become more reflective with age. The older behavior-disordered children were more reflective on the error measure than the younger behavior-disordered children and had equivalent error scores to both age groups of normals. This finding suggested a lag in the development of reflection in behavior-disordered children.

Keywords

Error Measure Construct Validity Normal Child Latency Measure Error Score 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Block, J., Block, J. H., & Harrington, D. M. Some misgivings about the Matching Familiar Figures Test as a measure of reflection-impulsivity.Developmental Psychology, 1974,10(5), 611–632.Google Scholar
  2. Campbell, S. B., Douglas, V. I., & Morgenstern, G. Cognitive styles in hyperactive children and the effect of mithylphenidate.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1971,12, 55–67.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, N. J., Weiss, G., & Minde, K. Cognitive styles in adolescents previously diagnosed as hyperactive.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1972,13, 203–209.Google Scholar
  4. Dunn, L. M.The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Minnesota: American Guidance Service, 1965.Google Scholar
  5. Eska, B., & Black, K. N. Conceptual tempo in young grade-school children.Child Development, 1971,42, 505–516.Google Scholar
  6. Hallahan, D. P., Stainback, J., Ball, D. W., and Kauffman, J. M. Selective attention in cerebral palsied and normal children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1973,1, 280–291.Google Scholar
  7. Kagan, J. Impulsive and reflective children: Significance of conceptual tempo. In J. Drunboltz (Ed.),Learning and the educational process. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965.Google Scholar
  8. Kagan, J. Reflection-impulsivity and reading ability in primary grade children.Child Development, 1965,36, 609–628.Google Scholar
  9. Kagan, J. Individual differences in the resolution of response uncertainty.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966,2, 154–160.Google Scholar
  10. Kagan, J. Reflection-impulsivity: The generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1966,71, 17–24.Google Scholar
  11. Kagan, J., Moss, H. A., & Siegel, I. E. Psychological significance of style of conceptualization. In J. C. Wright & J. Kagan (Eds.), Basic cognitive processes in children.Monographs of the Society of Research in Child Development, 1963,28(2, Serial No. 86).Google Scholar
  12. Kagan, J., Pearson, L., & Welch, L. The modificability of an impulsive tempo.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1966,57, 359–365.Google Scholar
  13. Kagan, J., Rosman, B. L., Day, D., Albert, J., & Phillips, W. Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes.Psychological Monographs, 1964,78, (1, Whole No. 578).Google Scholar
  14. Katz, J. M. Reflection-impulsivity and color-form sorting.Child Development, 1971,42, 745–754.Google Scholar
  15. Lewis, M., Rausch, M., Goldberg, S., & Dodd, C. Error response time and IQ: Sex differences in cognitive style of preschool children.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968,26, 563–568.Google Scholar
  16. Mussen, P. H., Conger, J. J., & Kagan, J.Child development and personality. New York: Harper & Row, 1974.Google Scholar
  17. Nadeau, G. H.Cognitive style in preschool children: A factor analytic study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1968.Google Scholar
  18. Quay, L. C., & Weld, G. L.Selective attention to auditory and visual stimuli in normal and learning disabled children. Final Report to the Bureau of the Educationally Handicapped, 1977.Google Scholar
  19. Ward, W. C. Reflection-impulsivity in kindergarten children.Child Development, 1968,39, 867–874.Google Scholar
  20. Weiss, G., Minde, K., Werry, J. S., Douglas, V. I., & Nemeth, E. Studies on the hyperactive child: A five-year follow up.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1971,24, 409–414.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald T. Brown
    • 1
  • Lorene C. Quay
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Early Childhood DevelopmentGeorgia State UniversityAtlanta

Personalised recommendations