Skip to main content
Log in

A developmental study of vigilance in learning-disabled and nondisabled children

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To test the proposition that learning-disabled children manifest a sustained attentional deficit, the Continuous Performance Test was administered to learningdisabled and nondisabled children at three age levels. Children were tested on three task lengths (5, 10, and 15 minutes) and two modalities (auditory and visual) in which dependent measures were correct detections and false responses, d′ and B values. As expected, learning-disabled children made fewer correct detections and more false responses and were less sensitive (d') to critical stimuli than were nondisabled children at all ages. There was also evidence to indicate that learningdisabled children apply different response criteria across age when compared to nondisabled children. B values varied significantly across age, group, modality, and time on task; d′ remained relatively unchanged across time periods. The popular notion that learning-disabled and younger subjects start a vigilance task with the same capacity as nondisabled older children but show a decline in attention as time on task increases was not supported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. P., Holcomb, C. G., & Doyle, R. B. Measurement of attention in hyperactive children.Exceptional Children, 1973,39, 534–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E.Decision and stress. London: Academic Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. The development of memory: Knowing, knowing about knowing and knowing how to know. In H. Reese (Ed.),Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, L. Reaction time as a measure of perceptual vigilance.Psychological Bulletin, 1966,65, 291–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. Short-term memory limitations in children: Capacity or processing deficits?Memory and Cognition, 1976,4, 559–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conners, C. K. A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1969,126, 884–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykman, R. A., Ackerman, P. T., Clements, S., & Peters, J. Specific learning disabilities: An attentional deficit syndrome. In H. R. Myklebust (Ed.),Progress in learning disabilities (Vol. 2). New York: Grune and Stratton, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register, Vol. 41, No. 250, Thursday, December 29, 1977.

  • Goldberg, J. O., & Konstantareas, M. M. Vigilance in hyperactive and normal children on a self-paced operant task.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1981,22, 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A.Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossberg, J. M., & Grant, B. F. Clinical psychophysics: Application of ratio scaling and signal detection method to research on pain, fear, drugs, and medical decision making.Psychological Bulletin, 1978,85, 11–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallahan, D. P., & Reeves, R. Selective attention and distractability. In B. F. Keogh (Ed.),Advances in special education (Vol. 1). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, C. S., Kirchner, G. L., Streissguth, A. P., & Little, R. E. Vigilance paradigm from preschool children used to relate vigilance behavior to IQ and prenatal exposure to alcohol.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1980,50, 863–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E. Mechanics of verbal ability.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 109–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D.Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge, D. Attention in the measurement of perceptual learning.Memory and Cognition, 1973,1, 268–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge, D. Acquisition of automatic processing perceptual and associative learning. In P. Rabbit & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading.Cognitive Psychology, 1974,6, 293–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, F. The development of sustained attention (vigilance) and inhibition in children: Some normative data.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1980,21, 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1978,107, 32–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. Experimental study of the higher nervous activity of the abnormal child.Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 1959,3, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackworth, J. F.Vigilance and attention—A signal detection approach. Manchester: C. Nichols, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. O.Psychological aspects of learning disabilities and reading disorders. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutschmann, J., Comblatt, B., & Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. Sustained attention in children at risk for schizophrenia. Reports on a continuous performance test.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1977,34, 571–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sostek, A. J., Buchsbaum, M. S., & Rapoport, J. L. Effects of amphetamine on vigilance performance in normal and hyperactive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1980,3, 491–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. Automatization failure in learning disabilities.Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 1982,2, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L. Developmental recall in learning-disabled children: Perceptual deficit or verbal mediation deficiency?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1979,7, 191–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L. Vigilance deficit in learning disabled children: A signal detection analysis.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1981,22, 393–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swets, J. A., & Kristofferson, A. B. Attention.Annual Review of Psychology, 1970,21, 339–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, D. H., Douglas, V. I., & Morgenstern, G. Sustained attention in hyperactive children.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1973,14, 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by funds from the Colorado Commission of Higher Education and a University of Northern Colorado Faculty Research Grant. The author is indebted to Weld School District VI and the University Lab School for their administrative assistance. The author is especially indebted to Russ Poulin in the Department of Statistical and Research Methodology for data collection, to John Payne of Educational Media Services for the development of apparatus and materials, and to Don Myers, Connie Baker, and Dr. Susan Kontos for computer programming and critical appraisal of these results.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swanson, H.L. A developmental study of vigilance in learning-disabled and nondisabled children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 11, 415–429 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00914249

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00914249

Keywords

Navigation