Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 657–673 | Cite as

Production deficiencies in elicited language but not in the spontaneous verbalizations of hyperactive children

  • Sydney S. Zentall


Setting and task conditions were assessed for their effects on the language of hyperactive children. Verbal data were recorded for 22 hyperactive children and 22 elementary-age controls during four storytelling tasks and transitions, and under two conditions of a nonverbal performance task in a counterbalanced order. Findings were that hyperactive children were more spontaneously talkative than their classmates during transitions and nonverbal tasks (nonelicited conditions) but were less talkative when they were asked to tell stories (elicited conditions). These findings and those attributable to the story comparisons were interpreted in line with the optimal stimulation theory, which suggests that minimal stimulus input (delays and nonelicited conditions) precipitate excessive verbal activity from hyperactive children. Production deficiencies, on the other hand, were specific to type of stimulus input to be processed. Stories requiring organization and planning without the external structure or salience of visual cues (a sequence of word cards or pictures) produced production deficiencies.


Verbal Data Performance Task Task Condition Verbal Activity Stimulus Input 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blunden, D., Spring, C., & Greenberg, L. M. (1974). Validation of the classroom behavior inventory.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 84–88.Google Scholar
  2. Browning, R. M. (1967). Hypo-responsiveness as a behavioral correlate of brain damage in children.Psychological Reports, 20, 251–259.Google Scholar
  3. Cairns, E., & Cammock, J. (1978). Development of a more reliable version of the Matching Familiar Figures Test.Developmental Psychology, 5, 555–560.Google Scholar
  4. Carlson, R. (1963). Recent research in originality.Elementary English, 40, 583–589.Google Scholar
  5. Carlson, R. (1965). Sparkling words: Two hundred practical and creative writing ideas. Berkeley, CA: Wagner.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, I. (1964).Language and thought. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Conners, C. K. (1973). Rating scales for use in drug studies with children (Special issue).Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 9, 24–84.Google Scholar
  8. Copeland, A. P. (1979). Types of private speech produced by hyperactive and nonhyperactive boys.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 7, 169–177.Google Scholar
  9. Copeland, A. P., & Weissbrod, C. S. (1978). Behavioral correlates of the hyperactivity factor of the Conners Teacher Questionnaire.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 339–343.Google Scholar
  10. Cunningham, C. E., Siegel, L. S., & Offord, D. R. (1985). A developmental dose-response analysis of the effects of methylphenidate on the peer interactions of attention deficit disordered boys.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 955–971.Google Scholar
  11. Davids, A. (1971). An objective instrument for assessing hyperkinesis in children.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 35–37.Google Scholar
  12. Dienske, H., DeJonge, G., & Sanders-Woudstra, J. A. R. (1985). Quantitative criteria for attention and activity in child psychiatric patients.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 895–915.Google Scholar
  13. Garnett, K. (1986). Telling tales: Narratives and learning disabled children.Topics in Language Disorders, 6, 44–56.Google Scholar
  14. Hebb, D. O. (1955). Drives and the CNS (conceptual nervous system).Psychological Review, 62, 243–254.Google Scholar
  15. Ludlow, C. L., Rapoport, J. L., Bassich, C. J., & Mikkelsen, E. G. (1980). Differential effects of dextroamphetamine on language performance in hyperactive and normal boys. In R. M. Knights & D. J. Bakker (Eds.),Treatment of hyperactive and learning disordered children. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  16. Madan-Swain, A. J., & Zentall, S. S. (1988).Behavioral comparisons of accepted and rejected hyperactive children and behavioral accommodations by their matched controls in play settings. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  17. Mayer, M., & Mayer, M. (1974).One frog too many. New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
  18. Moore, L., & Mastrollo, L. V. (Eds.). (1958). Who did it?Reader's Digest Skill Builder (Grade 2, Part 1). Pleasantville, NY: Reader's Digest Service.Google Scholar
  19. Pelham, W. E., & Bender, M. E. (1982). Peer relationships in hyperactive children: Description and treatment. In K. D. Gadow (Ed.),Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 365–436). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  20. Reese, H. W. (1962). Verbal mediation as a function of age level.Psychological Bulletin, 59, 502–509.Google Scholar
  21. Ullmann, R. K., Sleator, E. K., & Sprague, R. L. (1985). A change of mind: The Conners Abbreviated Rating Scales reconsidered.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 553–565.Google Scholar
  22. Weiss, G., & Hechtman, L. T. (1986).Hyperactive children grown up. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Whalen, C. K., Collins, B. E., Henker, B., Alkus, S. R., Adams., D., & Stapp, J. (1978). Behavior observations of hyperactive children and methylphenidate (Ritalin) effects in systematically structured classroom environments: Now you see them now you don't.Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 3, 177–187.Google Scholar
  24. Williams, B. J., Vincent, J. P., & Elrod, J. T. (1977).The behavioral components of hyperactivity. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  25. Zentall, S. (1975). Optimal stimulation as theoretical basis of hyperactivity.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 45, 549–563.Google Scholar
  26. Zentall, S. S. (1980). Behavioral comparisons of hyperactive and normally active children in natural settings.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8, 93–109.Google Scholar
  27. Zentall, S. S. (1984). Context effects in the behavioral ratings of hyperactive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 345–352.Google Scholar
  28. Zentall, S. S. (1985a). A context for hyperactivity. In K. D. Gadow (Ed.),Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 4, pp. 273–343). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  29. Zentall, S. S. (1985b). Stimulus-control factors in search performance of hyperactive children.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 480–485.Google Scholar
  30. Zentall, S. S., & Barack, R. S. (1979). Rating scales for hyperactivity: Concurrent validity, reliability, and decision to label for the Conners and Davids abbreviated scales.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 7, 179–190.Google Scholar
  31. Zentall, S. S., Gohs, D. E., & Culatta, B. (1983). Language and activity of hyperactive and comparison preschoolers in a listening task.Exceptional Children, 50, 255–266.Google Scholar
  32. Zentall, S. S., & Kruczek, T. (1988). The attraction of color for active attention problem children.Exceptional Children, 54, 357–362.Google Scholar
  33. Zentall, S. S., & Shaw, J. H. (1980). Effects of classroom noise on performance and activity of second-grade hyperactive and control children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 830–840.Google Scholar
  34. Zentall, S. S., & Zentall, T. R. (1983). Optimal stimulation: A model of disordered activity and performance in normal and deviant children.Psychological Bulletin, 94, 446–471.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sydney S. Zentall
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Special EducationPurdue UniversityWest Lafayette

Personalised recommendations