Solar Physics

, Volume 122, Issue 2, pp 215–226 | Cite as

Evaluation of magnetic shear in off-disk center active regions

  • P. Venkatakrishnan
  • M. J. Hagyard
  • D. H. Hathaway


We analyze the changes that projection effects produce in the evaluation of magnetic shear in off-disk center active regions by comparing angular shear calculated in image plane and heliographic coordinates. We describe the procedure for properly evaluating magnetic shear by transforming the observed vector magnetic field into the heliographic system and then apply this procedure to evaluate magnetic shear along the magnetic neutral line in an active region that was observed on 1984 April 24 at a longitude offset of -45°. In particular, we show that the number of ‘critically sheared’ pixels along an east-west directed segment of the neutral line in the leader sunspot group changes from 16 in the image plane magnetogram to 14 in the heliographic magnetogram. We also show that the critical shear as calculated in the image plane served as a good predictor for the location of flaring activity since the flare ribbons of the great flare of April 24 bracketed the inversion line where the critical shear was located. These results indicate that for this particular region, projection effects did not significantly affect the evaluation of critical shear.


Magnetic Field Flare Active Region Good Predictor Image Plane 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Gesztelyi, L. and Kalman, B.: 1986,Adv. Space Res. 6 (6).Google Scholar
  2. Hagyard, M. J.: 1987,Solar Phys. 107, 239.Google Scholar
  3. Hagyard, M. J., Cumings, N. P., and West, E. A.: 1985, in C. De Jager and Chen Biao (eds.),Proceedings of Kunming Workshop on Solar Physics and Interplanetary Travelling Phenomena, Science Press, Beijing, China, p. 204.Google Scholar
  4. Hagyard, M. J., Cumings, N. P., West, E. A., and Smith, J. E.: 1982,Solar Phys. 80, 33.Google Scholar
  5. Hagyard, M. J., Smith, J. B., Jr., Teuber, D., and West, E. A.: 1984,Solar Phys. 91, 115.Google Scholar
  6. Kurokawa, H., Hanaoka, Y., Shibata, K., and Uchida, Y.: 1987,Solar Phys. 108, 251.Google Scholar
  7. Moore, R. L., Hagyard, M. J., and Davis, J. M.: 1987,Solar Phys. 113, 347.Google Scholar
  8. Severny, A. B.: 1958,Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 20, 22.Google Scholar
  9. Stenflo, J. O.: 1985, in M. J. Hagyard (ed.),Measurements of Solar Vector Magnetic Fields, NASA CP-2374, p. 263.Google Scholar
  10. Van Hoven, G., Anzer, U., Barbosa, J., Birn, J., Cheng, C.-C., Hansen, R. T., Jackson, B. V., Martin, S. F., McIntosh, P. S., Nakagawa, Y., Priest, E. R., Reeves, E. M., Reichmann, E. J., Schmahl, E. J., Smith, J. B., Solodyna, C. V., Thomas, R. J., Uchida, Y., and Walker, A. B. C.: 1980, in P. A. Sturrock (ed.),Solar Flares, Colorado Associated University Press, Boulder, p. 17.Google Scholar
  11. Venkatakrishnan, P. and Gary, G. A.: 1989,Solar Phys. 120, 235.Google Scholar
  12. Venkatakrishnan, P., Hagyard, M. J., and Hathaway, D. H.: 1988,Solar Phys. 115, 125.Google Scholar
  13. Wilkinson, L. K., Emslie, A. G., and Gary, G. A.: 1989,Solar Phys. 119, 77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Venkatakrishnan
    • 1
  • M. J. Hagyard
    • 1
  • D. H. Hathaway
    • 1
  1. 1.1Space Science Laboratory, NASA Marshall Space Flight CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations