Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 443–449 | Cite as

A multistudy analysis of socioeconomic status (SES) and the measures and outcomes of cognitive-behavioral treatment with children

  • Lauren Braswell
  • Philip C. Kendall
  • Eugene S. Urbain
Article
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

The relationship of the child's socioeconomic status (SES) to improvement and generalization from cognitive behavioral-treatment was investigated by comparing high and low SES groups on teacher ratings, performance measures, and judges' ratings of improvement and maintenance of positive change. Fifty-eight teacher referred classroom problem children (grades 2–6) who had served as treated subjects in one of three treatment outcome studies were examined. SES data were collected by administration of a questionnaire to the head of each household. The judges' ratings were performed on clusters of teacher ratings and clusters of performance measures that were present in each study. Results indicated that, despite SES group variation in level of performance, improvement, when it occurred, was evident for both high and low SES groups. In addition, there were significant differences on a number of the performance measures at pretreatment, posttreatment, and follow-up. Initial SES group differences in verbal ability as measured by the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) appear to have been an important factor in these performance differences.

Keywords

Socioeconomic Status Treatment Outcome Positive Change Performance Difference Group Variation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bee, H. L., Van Egeren, L. F., Streissguth, A. P., Nyman, B. A., & Lecke, M. S. Social class differences in maternal teaching strategies and speech patterns.Developmental Psychology, 1969,1, 726–734.Google Scholar
  2. Chandler, M. J. Egocentricism and antisocial behavior: The assessment and training of social perspective-taking skills.Developmental Psychology, 1973,9, 326–332.Google Scholar
  3. Conners, C. K. A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1969,126, 884–888.Google Scholar
  4. Dunn, L. M.Expanded manual for the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Minneapolis: American Guidance Series, 1965.Google Scholar
  5. Hess, R. D., & Shipman, V. C. Early experience and the socialization of cognitive modes in children.Child Development, 1965,36, 869–886.Google Scholar
  6. Hollingshead, A. B.Two-factor index of social position. New Haven: Author, 1957.Google Scholar
  7. Kagan, J. Reflection-impulsivity: The generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1966,71, 17–24.Google Scholar
  8. Kendall, P. C. Cognitive-behavioral interventions with children. In B. B. Lahey & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.)Advances in Child Clinical Psychology (Vol. 4). New York: Plenum Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  9. Kendall, P. C., & Wilcox, L. E. Self-control in children: The development of a rating scale.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979,47, 1020–1030.Google Scholar
  10. Kendall, P. C., & Wilcox, L. E. A cognitive-behavioral treatment for impulsivity: Concrete versus conceptual training with non-self-controlled problem children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1980,48, 80–91.Google Scholar
  11. Kendall, P. C., & Zupan, B. A. Individual versus group application of cognitive-behavioral self-control procedures with children.Behavior Therapy, 1981,12, 344–359.Google Scholar
  12. Lorion, R. P. Socioeconomic status and traditional treatment approaches reconsidered.Psychological Bulletin, 1973,79, 263–270.Google Scholar
  13. Porteus, S. D.The maze test: Recent advances. Palo Alto: Pacific Books, 1955.Google Scholar
  14. Ramey & CampbellGoogle Scholar
  15. Ramey, C. & Campbell, F. Parental attitudes and poverty.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1976,128, 3–6.Google Scholar
  16. Ramey, C., Farran, D. C., & Campbell, F. A. Predicting IQ from mother-infant interactions.Child Development, 1979,50, 804–814.Google Scholar
  17. Ramey, C., & Mills, P. Social and intellectual consequences of day-care for high risk infants. In R. Webb. (Ed.),Social development in childhood: Daycare programs and research. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  18. Ramey, C., Mills, P., Campbell, F., & O'Brien, C. Infant's home environments: A comparison of high-risk families and families from the general population.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1975,80, 40–42.Google Scholar
  19. Shure, M., & Spivack, G. Means-ends thinking, adjustment and social class among elementary school-aged children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972,38, 348–353.Google Scholar
  20. Urbain, E. S.Interpersonal problem-solving training and social perspective-taking training with impulsive children via modeling, role-play, and self-instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauren Braswell
    • 2
  • Philip C. Kendall
    • 2
  • Eugene S. Urbain
    • 1
  1. 1.Wilder Child Guidance CenterUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolis

Personalised recommendations