Modification of anger in children by affective imagery training


From a school population of normal children third through fifth grades), thirty children initially identified as “angry”were randomly assigned to either an affective imagery training group, an attention group, or a control group. The treatment group received three sessions of affective imagery in which they focused on physiological changes and on their thoughts associated with prior emotional experiences. Teachers recorded pre-, post- , and short term follow-up aggressive behaviors for all thirty children. Cognitive perceptions and attributions were recorded at the same three occasions on the Affect Questionnaire. Results suggested that, as a result of affective imagery training, angry children's perceptions and cognitions shifted from “angry” towards “sad,” and there was a concomitant decrease in observed aggressive classroom behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Reference notes

  1. 1.

    Garrison, S. R., & Stolberg, A. L. Preliminary directions for measuring self-reported affect in children. Unpublished manuscript, Virgina Commonwealth University, 1981.

  2. 2.

    Garrison, S. R., & Stolberg, A. L. Affective Imagery Training: A procedures manual. Unpublished manuscript, Virgina Commonwealth University, 1981.


  1. 3.

    Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. Behavioral problems and competencies reported by parents of normal and disturbed children aged 4 through 16.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1981, Serial No. 188.

  2. 4.

    Bandura, A.Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 5.

    Berkowitz, L. Situational and personal conditions governing reactions to aggressive cues. In D. Magnusson and N. Ehdler (Eds.),Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erblaum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 6.

    Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.Unmasking the face. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 7.

    Feshbach, N. D. Empathy training: A field study in affective educational. In S. Feshbach and A. Fraczek (Eds.),Aggression and behavior change. New York: Praeger, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 8.

    Izard, C. E.Patterns of emotions. New York: Academic Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 9.

    Izard, C. E. On the ontogenesis of emotions and emotion-cognition relationships in infancy. In M. Lewis and L. Rosenblum (Eds.),The development of affect. New York: Plenum, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 10.

    Izard, E, E. Emotion expressions and personality integration in infancy. In C. E. Izard (Ed.),Emotions in personality and psychopathology: Emotions, personality and psychotherapy. New York: Plenum, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 11.

    Johnson, E., III, & Myers, T. I. The development and use of the Primary Affect Scale.Naval Medical Research Institute Report 67-1. Bethesda, Maryland, 1967.

  10. 12.

    Lewis, M., & Rosenblum, L. A. Introduction: Issues in affect development. In M. Lewis and L. Rosenblum (Eds.),The development of affect. New York: Plenum, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 13.

    Loew, C. A. Acquisition of a hostile attitude and its relationship to aggressive behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967,5, 335–341.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 14.

    Lovaas, O. I. Interaction between verbal and nonverbal behavior.Child Development, 1961,32, 329–336.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 15.

    Mahoney, M. J. Reflections on the cognitive-learning trend in psychotherapy.American Psychologist, 1977,32, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 16.

    Nashby, W., Hayden, B., & DePaulo, B. M. Attributional bias among aggressive boys to interpret unambiguous social stimuli as displays of hostility.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1980,89, 459–468.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 17.

    Novaco, R. W. Anger and coping with stress: Cognitive behavioral intervention. In J. P. Foreyt and D. P. Rathjen (Eds.),Cognitive behavioral therapy: Research and applications. New York: Plenum, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 18.

    Novaco, R. W. The cognitive regulation of anger and stress. In P. Kendall and S. Hollon (Eds.),Cognitive-behavioral interventions: Theory, research, and procedures. New York: Academic Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 19.

    Parke, R. D., Ewall, W., & Slaby, R. G. Hostile and helpful verbalizations as regulators of nonverbal aggression.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972,23, 243–248.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 20.

    Petzel, J. P., & Michaels, E. J. Perception of violence as a function of levels of hostility.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973,41, 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 21.

    Schacter, S., & Singer, J. E. Cognitive, social and physiological determinants of emotional states.Psychological Review, 1962,69, 379–399.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 22.

    Toch, H. H., & Schulte, R. Readiness to perceive violence as a result of police training.British Journal of Psychology, 1961,52, 389–393.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnold L. Stolberg Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garrison, S.R., Stolberg, A.L. Modification of anger in children by affective imagery training. J Abnorm Child Psychol 11, 115–129 (1983).

Download citation


  • Treatment Group
  • Aggressive Behavior
  • Physiological Change
  • Training Group
  • Emotional Experience