Ferroelasticity of materials with a mechanical shape memory

  • E. N. Bondarev
  • V. V. Dudukalenko


It is extremely difficult to take into account the variety of aspects of the behavior of solids when they are deformed. Hence, when designing constructions, simplifying models are introduced which take into account only the most important properties of the materials in each specific case (creep, aftereffect, plasticity, etc.), and the corresponding phenomenological theories are employed [1], In this paper we attempt to construct the fundamentals of a theory which describes the phenomenon of ferroelasticity due to the behavior of thermoelastic martensite, first discovered in [2], The apparatus of this theory will be necessary when designing self-recovering constructions which can be manufactured from materials with a mechanical shape memory.


Mathematical Modeling Martensite Mechanical Engineer Industrial Mathematic Shape Memory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    Yu. N. Rabotnov, Creep Problems in Structural Members, North-Holland (1969).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. V. Kurdyumov and L. G. Khandros, “Thermoelastic equilibrium in martensitic transformations,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk, SSSR,66, No. 2 (1949).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. A. Apaev and B. I. Voronenko, “Physical representations of phase transitions in ‘shape memory’ alloys,” Metalloved. Term. Obrab. Met., No. 5 (1975).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. G. Khandros and N. A. Arbuzova, “Martensitic transformation memory effect in superelasticity,” in: Metals, Electrons, Lattice [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1975).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. Delaey, R. Krishnan, H. Tas, and H. Warlimont, “Thermoelasticity, pseudoelasticity and the memory effects associated with martensitic transformation. Review. Parts 1, 2, 3,” J. Mater. Sci.,9, 1521 (1974).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. Wayman and K. Shimisu, “The shape memory (“marmen”) effect in alloys,” Met. Sci. J.,6, No. 9 (1972).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Mohamed and J. Washburn, “On the mechanism of the shape memory effect in Ni-Ti alloys,” Met. Trans.,A7, 1041 (1976).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. Nakanishi et al., “Pseudoelasticity in AuCd thermoelastic martensite,” Phil. Mag.,28, No. 2 (1973).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. S. Tikhonov et al., “Mechanism of the martensitic memory in metallic materials,” Fiz. Khim. Obrab, Mater., No. 5 (1976).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. D. Ivlev and G. I. Bykovtsev, The Theory of Hardened Plastics [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1971).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. N. Bondarev
    • 1
  • V. V. Dudukalenko
    • 1
  1. 1.Kuibyshev

Personalised recommendations