Catalytic synthesis of nitriles
- 25 Downloads
The optimum conditions were found for the synthesis of benzonitrile, phenylacetonitrile, and hydrocinnamonitrile by reaction of ammonia with benzyl, phenethyl, and 3-phenylpropyl alcohols over a nickelalumina catalyst in a flow system.
In presence of a 3% nickel-alumina catalyst at 390° the yield of benzonitrile attains 51.7%. The maximum yields of phenylacetonitrile (at 300°) and hydrocinnamonitrile (at 330°) are obtained by carrying out the nitrile formation over a 1.5% nickel-alumina catalyst and are 44.8 and 50.8%, respectively.
A hypothesis was advanced on the mechanism of the formation of a small amount of amines and aromatic hydrocarbons as by-products in the nitrile synthesis.
KeywordsAlcohol Ammonia Hydrocarbon Optimum Condition Nitrile
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.A. Mitchell, and E. Emmet Reid, J. Am. Chem. Soc.53, 321 (1931).Google Scholar
- 2.H. P. Coldwell and H. D. Chapman, German Fed. Republic Patent 881,342, June 29, 1953; Referat. Zhur. Khim., 10769, 4 (1956).Google Scholar
- 3.W. Ritter and J. Schmidt, German Fed. Republic Patent 893,500, October 15, 1953; Referat. Zhur. Khim., 30302, 10 (1956).Google Scholar
- 4.A. V. Willett and J. R. Pailtrop, French Patent 1,062,324, April 21, 1954; Referat. Zhur. Khim., 4873, 2 (1956).Google Scholar
- 5.E. L. Reilly, U. S. Patent 2,769,832, November 6, 1956; Referat. Zhur. Khim., 5126, 15 (1958).Google Scholar
- 6.C. H. Keever and J. W. Nemec, U.S. Patent 2,770,641, February 13, 1956; Referat. Zhur. Khim., 54,898, 16 (1958).Google Scholar
- 7.M. A. Popov and N. I. Shuikin, Izvest. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otdel. Khim. Nauk6, 713 (1958); 1992 (1959).Google Scholar
- 8.I. F. Norris and A. A. Ashdown, J Am. Chem. Soc.47, 845 (1925).Google Scholar
- 9.Ph. Landrieu, F. Baylocq, and I. R. Johnson, Bull. Soc. Chim. France ,45, 46 (1929).Google Scholar
- 10.V. Grignard, Compt. rend.141, 44 (1905).Google Scholar
- 11.H. D. Law, J. Chem. Soc., 101, 1030 (1912).Google Scholar
- 12.J. W. Bruhl, Liebigs Ann. Chem.200, 191 (1880).Google Scholar
- 13.J. H. Mathews, J. Am. Chem. Soc.48, 569 (1926).Google Scholar
- 14.J. Timmermans, Bull. Soc. chim. beiges.25, 300 (1911); Chem. Zbl.,11, 1016 (1911).Google Scholar
- 15.W. E. St. Turner and E. W. Merry, J. Chem. Soc.,97, 2075 (1910).Google Scholar
- 16.A. Cotton and H. Mouton, Ann. Chim. Phys. ,28, 214 (1913).Google Scholar
- 17.F. V. Grimm and W. A. Patrick, J. Am. Chem. Soc.45, 2799 (1923).Google Scholar
- 18.L. Wolf and K. Greulich, Liebigs Ann. Chem.394, 44 (1912).Google Scholar
- 19.T. W. Richards and F. Barry, J. Am. Chem. Soc.37, 1000 (1915).Google Scholar
- 20.T. W. Richards and J. W. Shipley, J. Am. Chem. Soc.38, 996 (1916).Google Scholar
- 21.F. I. Wilson and W. M. Hyslop, J. Chem. Soc.,123, 2616 (1923).Google Scholar
- 22.A. W. Hofmann, Ber.7, 520 (1874).Google Scholar
- 23.V. Grignard, Compt. rend.138, 1049 (1904).Google Scholar
- 24.P. Sabatier and J. B. Senderens, Compt. rend.140, 486 (1905).Google Scholar