Skip to main content
Log in

Zur diamagnetischen Anisotropie im [2.2]Metacyclophan

Concerning the diamagnetic anisotropy of [2.2]metacyclophane

  • Organische Chemie und Biochemie
  • Published:
Monatshefte für Chemie / Chemical Monthly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to furnish a reliable interpretation of the1H-NMR spectrum of [2.2]metacyclophane (1) based on the ring current theory two basic conditions must be fullfilled:

  1. 1.

    Bond lengths angle deformations due to the puckered topology of the molecule must be taken into account. The geometry parameters can be deduced fromX-ray data.

  2. 2.

    The (fictive) reference chemical shift of the system (i.e. unperturbed by the “second” benzene ring) must be established since the Δ δ's ofBovey's ring current formula have to be related to a reference.

The shifts calculated on the basis of these assumptions are in agreement with the actual spectrum.

Moreover, it can be shown that for basic reasons a quantitative approach to the chemical shift of the methylene protons in the bridgevia ring current theory is impossible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. D. J. Wilson, V. Boekelheide undR. W. Griffin, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.82, 6302 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Akabori, T. Sato undK. Hata, J. Org. Chem.33, 3277 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. S. Gutowsky undC. Juan, J. Chem. Phys.37, 120 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. L. Allinger, B. J. Gorden, S. E. Hu undR. A. Ford, J. Org. Chem.32, 2272 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Burri undW. Jenny, Helv. Chim. Acta50, 1978 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys.24, 1111 (1956); J. Mol. Phys.1, 175 (1958);H. J. Bernstein, W. G. Schneider undJ. A. Pople, Proc. Roy. Soc.A 236, 515 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. J. Brown, J. Chem. Soc.1953, 3278.

  8. M. G. Newton, T. J. Walter undN. L. Allinger, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.95, 5652 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. S. Waugh undR. W. Fessenden, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.79, 846 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. A. Hoffmann, S. Forsen undB. Gestblom, in: NMR-Grundlagen und Fortschritte (P. Diehl, E. Fluck undR. Kosfeld, Hrsg.), Bd. 5 Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer. 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. W. Emsley, J. Feeney undL. H. Sutcliffe, High Resolution NMR-Spectroscopy, Bd. 1 und 2. Pergamon Press. 1966.

  12. E. Langer undH. Lehner, Tetrahedron29, 375 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Eberhardt, H. Lehner undK. Schlögl, Mh. Chem.104, 1409 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Baker, J. F. W. McOmie undJ. M. Norman, J. Chem. Soc.1951, 1114.

  15. C. E. Johnson undF. A. Bovey, J. Chem. Phys.29, 1012 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mit 1 Abbildung

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glotzmann, C., Langer, E. & Lehner, H. Zur diamagnetischen Anisotropie im [2.2]Metacyclophan. Monatshefte für Chemie 105, 354–361 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00907384

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00907384

Navigation