Soviet Physics Journal

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 463–467 | Cite as

Present status of the Pomeranchuk theorem and the Pomeranchuk-Okun' hypothesis. I

  • Z. Z. Torich
  • Yu. M. Lomsadze
Article
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

The present theoretical and experimental situation with respect to the Pomeranchuk theorem and the Pomeranchuk-Okun' hypothesis is analyzed briefly.

Keywords

Present Status Experimental Situation Pomeranchuk Theorem 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    I. Ya. Pomeranchuk, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.,30, 423 (1956).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. B. Okun' and I. Ya. Pomeranchuk, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.,30, 424 (1956).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. Ya. Pomeranchuk, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.,34, 725 (1958).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. W. Greenberg, Group Theoretical Concepts and Methods in Elementary Particle Physics (Lectures of the Istanbul Summer School of Theoretical Physics, July 16-August 4, 1962), New York (1964), p. 104.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yu. M. Lomsadze and B. A. Agranovskii, Yad. Fiz.,30, 754 (1979).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu. M. Lomsadze, in: Proceedings of International Seminar-78 on High-Energy Physics and Field Theory, Institute of High-Energy Physics, Serpukhov,(1979).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. N. Yang, J. Math. Phys.,4, 52 (1963).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. J. Eden, High Energy Collisions of Elementary Particles, Cambridge Univ. Press (1968).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. L. Foldy and R. F. Peierls, Phys. Rev.,130, 1585 (1963).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Amati, L. L. Foldy, A. Stanghellini, and L. Van Hove, Nuovo Cimento32, 1685 (1964).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Kottler, Nuovo Cimento,67A, 88 (1970).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. D. Solov'ev and A. V. Shchelkachev, Fiz. Elem. Chastits At. Yadra6, 571 (1975).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Froissart, Phys. Rev.,123, 1053 (1961); A. Martin, Nuovo Cimento,42, 930 (1966).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. S. Carrol et al., Phys. Lett.,B80, 423 (1979).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. Flaminio et al., Compilation of Cross-Sections. CERN-HERA 79-01, 79-02, 79-03.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. V. Barnes et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.,37, 76 (1976).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. W. Akerlof et al., Phys. Rev.D14, 2864 (1976).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. Giacomelli, A. F. Greene, and J. R. Sanford, Phys. Rep.,19C, 169 (1975).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    ¯NN and ¯ND Interactions — A Compilation. LBL-58, (1972).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    F. Schrempp and B. S. Schrempp, TH. 2054-CERN, (1975).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    V. N. Bolotov et al., Yad. Fiz.,19, 115 (1974).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    W. D. Apel et al., Yad. Fiz.,26, 1222 (1977).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. J. Foley et al., Phys. Rev.,D9, 42 (1974).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. C. Fox and C. Quigg, UCRL-20001, (1970).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yu. M. Antipov et al., Yad. Fiz.,18, 353 (1973).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Z. Z. Torich
    • 1
  • Yu. M. Lomsadze
    • 1
  1. 1.Uzhgorod Branch of the Theory of Elementary Interactions, Institute of Nuclear ResearchAcademy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSRUSSR

Personalised recommendations